Buccal pad of fat, advanced platelet-rich fibrin, fibrin glue, and oxidized cellulose plug in the management of oroantral communication: A comparative clinical study.
{"title":"Buccal pad of fat, advanced platelet-rich fibrin, fibrin glue, and oxidized cellulose plug in the management of oroantral communication: A comparative clinical study.","authors":"Nermine Ramadan Mahmoud","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oroantral communication (OAC) is a significant complication following the removal of maxillary posterior teeth that is a consequence of them being close to the maxillary sinus floor. The current study evaluated the efficacy of four treatment modalities for OAC management: buccal fat pads (BFPs), advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF), fibrin glue, and oxidized regenerated cellulose plugs. Twenty-four patients with OAC were randomly assigned to four treatment groups (n = 6 each) and clinically assessed for facial swelling, healing outcomes, and patient-reported pain at baseline, on day 3, and at weekly intervals for 4 weeks after their respective treatments. A linear mixed-effects model found a significant reduction in pain over time in all groups. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons of postoperative pain showed statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline and after 1 week. The BFP group had the highest scores for initial pain, while the A-PRF group had the least, with a consistent reduction throughout the study. The BFP group displayed significantly increased facial swelling on day 3, which had subsided after 2 weeks; the fibrin glue group followed a similar pattern but stabilized quickly. The A-PRF group showed minimal swelling and rapid tissue regeneration, while the oxidized regenerated cellulose group displayed less responsiveness for larger OACs. The choice of therapeutic technique for managing OACs should therefore be chosen according to the defect size and anatomical considerations. While BFP and fibrin glue were more efficacious for larger defects, the A-PRF technique showed rapid healing and less discomfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Oroantral communication (OAC) is a significant complication following the removal of maxillary posterior teeth that is a consequence of them being close to the maxillary sinus floor. The current study evaluated the efficacy of four treatment modalities for OAC management: buccal fat pads (BFPs), advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF), fibrin glue, and oxidized regenerated cellulose plugs. Twenty-four patients with OAC were randomly assigned to four treatment groups (n = 6 each) and clinically assessed for facial swelling, healing outcomes, and patient-reported pain at baseline, on day 3, and at weekly intervals for 4 weeks after their respective treatments. A linear mixed-effects model found a significant reduction in pain over time in all groups. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons of postoperative pain showed statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline and after 1 week. The BFP group had the highest scores for initial pain, while the A-PRF group had the least, with a consistent reduction throughout the study. The BFP group displayed significantly increased facial swelling on day 3, which had subsided after 2 weeks; the fibrin glue group followed a similar pattern but stabilized quickly. The A-PRF group showed minimal swelling and rapid tissue regeneration, while the oxidized regenerated cellulose group displayed less responsiveness for larger OACs. The choice of therapeutic technique for managing OACs should therefore be chosen according to the defect size and anatomical considerations. While BFP and fibrin glue were more efficacious for larger defects, the A-PRF technique showed rapid healing and less discomfort.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.