Adrenaline: A Lifeline for Rapid Drug Desensitization in Hypersensitive Patients.

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
J Gil-Serrano, P Galvan-Blasco, J Pereira-Gonzalez, A Salvany-Pijuan, M Gonzalez Di-Paolo, M Guilarte, O Luengo, A Sala-Cunill, V Cardona, M Labrador-Horrillo
{"title":"Adrenaline: A Lifeline for Rapid Drug Desensitization in Hypersensitive Patients.","authors":"J Gil-Serrano, P Galvan-Blasco, J Pereira-Gonzalez, A Salvany-Pijuan, M Gonzalez Di-Paolo, M Guilarte, O Luengo, A Sala-Cunill, V Cardona, M Labrador-Horrillo","doi":"10.18176/jiaci.1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Chemotherapeutic agents (CMTs) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are common causes of drug allergy, which is often managed using rapid drug desensitization (RDD). Despite its effectiveness, RDD can be hampered by severe breakthrough reactions (BTRs), potentially leading to failure of the procedure. To evaluate the usefulness and safety of adrenaline infusion (AI) as an adjuvant during RDD in patients who experience severe drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) during standard desensitization protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study, analyzing data from patients who underwent RDD to CMTs or mAbs in a tertiary hospital from January 2015 to June 2024. We included patients who required AI to safely achieve RDD after a severe initial DHR or failure of a standard RDD protocol due to repeated DHRs. Comorbidities, adrenaline doses, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RDD with AI was administered in 42 patients. Of these, 77% (n=32) were women, and the mean age was 57 years. The most frequently involved drugs were platinum salts (58%), mAbs (26%), and taxanes (14%). A total of 151 RDDs were performed with AI. Skin tests were positive in 69% of patients. The most frequent initial BTR (65%) was moderate or severe anaphylaxis. The most common AEs induced by AI were tremor (14%) and tachycardia (7%), which resolved after reducing the AI infusion rate. The median (IQR) cumulative dose of adrenaline administered throughout the RDD procedure was 0.76 mg (0.4-1.2mg), with a median infusion rate of 8 mL/h (4- 15ml/h), and median maximum AI rate of 3.33 μg/min (2-5.3 μg/min).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI is a useful and safe therapeutic tool for selected high-risk desensitization procedures, mitigating severe DHR with mostly minor AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.1075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Chemotherapeutic agents (CMTs) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are common causes of drug allergy, which is often managed using rapid drug desensitization (RDD). Despite its effectiveness, RDD can be hampered by severe breakthrough reactions (BTRs), potentially leading to failure of the procedure. To evaluate the usefulness and safety of adrenaline infusion (AI) as an adjuvant during RDD in patients who experience severe drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) during standard desensitization protocols.

Methods: Retrospective observational study, analyzing data from patients who underwent RDD to CMTs or mAbs in a tertiary hospital from January 2015 to June 2024. We included patients who required AI to safely achieve RDD after a severe initial DHR or failure of a standard RDD protocol due to repeated DHRs. Comorbidities, adrenaline doses, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

Results: RDD with AI was administered in 42 patients. Of these, 77% (n=32) were women, and the mean age was 57 years. The most frequently involved drugs were platinum salts (58%), mAbs (26%), and taxanes (14%). A total of 151 RDDs were performed with AI. Skin tests were positive in 69% of patients. The most frequent initial BTR (65%) was moderate or severe anaphylaxis. The most common AEs induced by AI were tremor (14%) and tachycardia (7%), which resolved after reducing the AI infusion rate. The median (IQR) cumulative dose of adrenaline administered throughout the RDD procedure was 0.76 mg (0.4-1.2mg), with a median infusion rate of 8 mL/h (4- 15ml/h), and median maximum AI rate of 3.33 μg/min (2-5.3 μg/min).

Conclusions: AI is a useful and safe therapeutic tool for selected high-risk desensitization procedures, mitigating severe DHR with mostly minor AEs.

肾上腺素:过敏患者快速药物脱敏的生命线。
背景与目的:化疗药物(CMTs)和单克隆抗体(mab)是药物过敏的常见原因,通常采用快速药物脱敏(RDD)治疗。尽管RDD有效,但严重的突破反应(BTRs)可能会阻碍RDD,从而可能导致手术失败。评估肾上腺素输注(AI)作为标准脱敏方案中出现严重药物超敏反应(DHR)的患者RDD期间辅助治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性观察研究,分析2015年1月至2024年6月在某三级医院接受RDD治疗的cts或单克隆抗体患者的数据。我们纳入了在严重的初始DHR或由于重复DHR而导致标准RDD方案失败后需要人工智能安全地实现RDD的患者。评估合并症、肾上腺素剂量和不良事件(ae)。结果:42例患者采用RDD联合AI治疗。其中,77% (n=32)为女性,平均年龄为57岁。最常见的药物是铂盐(58%)、单克隆抗体(26%)和紫杉烷(14%)。人工智能共完成151例rdd。69%的患者皮肤试验呈阳性。最常见的初始BTR(65%)是中度或重度过敏反应。AI最常见的不良反应是震颤(14%)和心动过速(7%),降低AI输注率后消退。整个RDD过程中肾上腺素的中位(IQR)累积剂量为0.76 mg (0.4-1.2mg),中位输注速率为8 mL/h (4- 15ml/h),中位最大AI速率为3.33 μg/min (2-5.3 μg/min)。结论:人工智能是一种有用且安全的治疗工具,可用于选定的高风险脱敏手术,减轻严重DHR和大多数轻微ae。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology (J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol) provides an attractive and very active forum for basic and clinical research in allergology and clinical immunology.Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology publishes original works, reviews, short communications and opinions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信