The Physiologic Effect of Augmented Reality Simulation Versus Traditional Simulation: A Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Asheen Rama, Marcos S Rojas-Pino, Ellen Y Wang, Samuel T Rodriguez, Man Yee Suen, Janet S Titzler, Michelle Zuniga-Hernandez, Christian Jackson, Oswaldo Rosales, Faith Collins, Thomas J Caruso
{"title":"The Physiologic Effect of Augmented Reality Simulation Versus Traditional Simulation: A Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Asheen Rama, Marcos S Rojas-Pino, Ellen Y Wang, Samuel T Rodriguez, Man Yee Suen, Janet S Titzler, Michelle Zuniga-Hernandez, Christian Jackson, Oswaldo Rosales, Faith Collins, Thomas J Caruso","doi":"10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Rama","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional medical simulations leverage stressful scenarios to potentiate memory. Augmented reality (AR) simulations provide cost-effective experiences using holograms instead of mannequins. This study investigated the physiologic response to AR simulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a noninferiority, controlled trial at an academic, pediatric hospital in Northern California among health care workers randomized to AR or traditional, in situ medical simulations. The primary outcome investigated parasympathetic tone. Biometric sensors assessed parasympathetic tone as respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). A difference in RSA of less than 10% between groups was considered noninferior. Secondary outcomes explored usability, ergonomics, satisfaction, and recall with the System Usability Scale (SUS), ISO 9241-400, Simulation Design Scale (SDS), and an electronic questionnaire 5 months after the intervention, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 participants were enrolled and 106 analyzed. Both groups experienced a decrease in mean RSA from baseline to during the simulation (<i>P</i> < .001 for both groups). Subsequently, there was an increase in RSA from the simulation period to the recovery period (<i>P</i> < .001 for the AR group and <i>P</i> = .035 for the traditional group). Regarding secondary outcomes, the mean SUS score of 70.5 suggested good usability, 65.38% of AR participants reported feeling comfortable using the headset, and satisfaction in both groups was similar except for differences in use of real-life factors. The recall assessment was completed by 12 AR and 15 traditional participants, with similar scores between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = .4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AR simulations produced a noninferior change in parasympathetic tone compared with traditional simulations. Future investigations may explore the effectiveness of AR simulations for developing nontechnical skills during remote training. (Registration: Clinical Trials Registry NCT05674188.).</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"27 1","pages":"E740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Rama","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional medical simulations leverage stressful scenarios to potentiate memory. Augmented reality (AR) simulations provide cost-effective experiences using holograms instead of mannequins. This study investigated the physiologic response to AR simulations.

Methods: This was a noninferiority, controlled trial at an academic, pediatric hospital in Northern California among health care workers randomized to AR or traditional, in situ medical simulations. The primary outcome investigated parasympathetic tone. Biometric sensors assessed parasympathetic tone as respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). A difference in RSA of less than 10% between groups was considered noninferior. Secondary outcomes explored usability, ergonomics, satisfaction, and recall with the System Usability Scale (SUS), ISO 9241-400, Simulation Design Scale (SDS), and an electronic questionnaire 5 months after the intervention, respectively.

Results: A total of 111 participants were enrolled and 106 analyzed. Both groups experienced a decrease in mean RSA from baseline to during the simulation (P < .001 for both groups). Subsequently, there was an increase in RSA from the simulation period to the recovery period (P < .001 for the AR group and P = .035 for the traditional group). Regarding secondary outcomes, the mean SUS score of 70.5 suggested good usability, 65.38% of AR participants reported feeling comfortable using the headset, and satisfaction in both groups was similar except for differences in use of real-life factors. The recall assessment was completed by 12 AR and 15 traditional participants, with similar scores between the 2 groups (P = .4).

Conclusions: AR simulations produced a noninferior change in parasympathetic tone compared with traditional simulations. Future investigations may explore the effectiveness of AR simulations for developing nontechnical skills during remote training. (Registration: Clinical Trials Registry NCT05674188.).

增强现实模拟与传统模拟的生理效应:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
背景:传统的医学模拟利用压力情景来增强记忆。增强现实(AR)模拟使用全息图代替人体模型提供经济有效的体验。本研究探讨了对AR模拟的生理反应。方法:这是一项在北加州一家儿科医院进行的非劣效性对照试验,在医护人员中随机分配到AR组或传统的原位医学模拟组。主要结果调查副交感神经张力。生物传感器评估副交感神经张力为呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)。两组之间的RSA差异小于10%被认为是非劣等的。次要结果分别通过系统可用性量表(SUS)、ISO 9241-400、模拟设计量表(SDS)和干预后5个月的电子问卷调查了可用性、人体工程学、满意度和召回。结果:共入组111例,分析106例。从基线到模拟期间,两组的平均RSA都有所下降(两组的P < 0.001)。随后,从模拟期到恢复期,RSA有所增加(AR组P < 0.001,传统组P = 0.035)。至于次要结果,平均SUS得分为70.5,表明可用性良好,65.38%的AR参与者报告使用耳机感到舒适,除了使用现实生活因素的差异外,两组的满意度相似。召回评估由12名AR参与者和15名传统参与者完成,两组之间的得分相似(P = 0.4)。结论:与传统模拟相比,AR模拟产生了副交感神经张力的非劣变。未来的研究可能会探讨AR模拟在远程培训中发展非技术技能的有效性。(注册:临床试验注册中心NCT05674188.)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信