Correlation of electrogastrography and bioelectric impedance techniques for the gastric motility assessment.

Francisco M Vargas-Luna, Maria-Raquel Huerta-Franco, Isabel Delgadillo-Holtfort, Marco Balleza-Ordaz, Regina M Murillo-Torres
{"title":"Correlation of electrogastrography and bioelectric impedance techniques for the gastric motility assessment.","authors":"Francisco M Vargas-Luna, Maria-Raquel Huerta-Franco, Isabel Delgadillo-Holtfort, Marco Balleza-Ordaz, Regina M Murillo-Torres","doi":"10.1515/bmt-2024-0438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The electrical bioimpedance (EBI) technique has been used to measure gastric motility and emptying parameters. A well-known technique for this purpose is electrogastrography (EGG). No correlation between EGG signal and mechanical motility has been reported. In this study, a direct data comparison of these two techniques was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>23 volunteers underwent simultaneous gastric monitoring using EGG and EBI. Signal processing was performed to isolate the slow waves of 0.5-9 cpm. The parameters obtained from 70 % overlapped time slots of 3.5 min, included the dominant frequency and power of the normo-gastric region and the percentage of brady-, normo-, and tachy-gastric slow waves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EGG showed slightly higher values in dominant frequencies, whereas EBI displayed higher variability. High-frequency features were more significant in the EBI, with lower variability, and correlations were found in approximately half of the frequency spectra. Slow waves exhibited poor correlation, but were significant at 95 % of the timeslots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparing EBI and EGG, global parameters in the normogastric region had slight variances, which may not significantly impact clinical findings. The sensitivity of the EBI to higher frequencies is evident.</p>","PeriodicalId":93905,"journal":{"name":"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2024-0438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The electrical bioimpedance (EBI) technique has been used to measure gastric motility and emptying parameters. A well-known technique for this purpose is electrogastrography (EGG). No correlation between EGG signal and mechanical motility has been reported. In this study, a direct data comparison of these two techniques was performed.

Methods: 23 volunteers underwent simultaneous gastric monitoring using EGG and EBI. Signal processing was performed to isolate the slow waves of 0.5-9 cpm. The parameters obtained from 70 % overlapped time slots of 3.5 min, included the dominant frequency and power of the normo-gastric region and the percentage of brady-, normo-, and tachy-gastric slow waves.

Results: The EGG showed slightly higher values in dominant frequencies, whereas EBI displayed higher variability. High-frequency features were more significant in the EBI, with lower variability, and correlations were found in approximately half of the frequency spectra. Slow waves exhibited poor correlation, but were significant at 95 % of the timeslots.

Conclusions: Comparing EBI and EGG, global parameters in the normogastric region had slight variances, which may not significantly impact clinical findings. The sensitivity of the EBI to higher frequencies is evident.

胃电图与生物电阻抗技术在胃运动评估中的相关性。
目的:应用电生物阻抗(EBI)技术测量胃运动和排空参数。一种众所周知的技术是胃电图(EGG)。EGG信号与机械运动之间没有相关性的报道。在本研究中,对这两种技术进行了直接的数据比较。方法:23名志愿者同时进行胃监测,分别采用EGG和EBI。信号处理分离0.5 ~ 9cpm慢波。从70% %重叠3.5 min的时隙中获得的参数包括胃常区主导频率和功率以及胃慢波、胃常波和胃速慢波的百分比。结果:EGG的优势频率值略高,而EBI的变异性较高。高频特征在EBI中更为显著,具有较低的变异性,并且在大约一半的频谱中发现相关性。慢波表现出较差的相关性,但在95% %的时隙上是显著的。结论:比较EBI和EGG,正常胃区的整体参数有轻微的差异,这可能不会显著影响临床表现。EBI对高频的灵敏度是显而易见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信