Stephen Jaffee, Navnika Gupta, Dallas Kramer, Dorian M Kusyk, James Valeriano, Amanda Merkley, Trent Kite, Shaifali Arora, Pulkit Grover, Alexander C Whiting
{"title":"Stereo-electroencephalography in the setting of a preexisting deep brain stimulation device: illustrative case.","authors":"Stephen Jaffee, Navnika Gupta, Dallas Kramer, Dorian M Kusyk, James Valeriano, Amanda Merkley, Trent Kite, Shaifali Arora, Pulkit Grover, Alexander C Whiting","doi":"10.3171/CASE24854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation are increasingly being used to treat drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, patients who experience partial or limited improvement in seizure control could require additional surgical interventions or refinement of their epilepsy network characterization, including further stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) investigations. SEEG in the setting of previously implanted hardware demonstrates a myriad of technical challenges. The authors present the first reported demonstration of SEEG electrode implantation with a preexisting DBS device.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>The patient was a 36-year-old male with a history of severe DRE with focal impaired awareness seizures beginning at 7 years of age. Despite having a bilateral DBS device for the anterior nucleus of the thalamus, he continued to have 1-2 seizures per day and was offered SEEG. The patient tolerated the surgery well without any morbidity, with a successfully improved definition of his epilepsy network. SEEG allowed the medical team to titrate stimulation settings while following intracranial electrographic response.</p><p><strong>Lessons: </strong>SEEG in the setting of preexisting DBS can be performed safely without damage to functioning hardware, and the authors obtained characterization and localization of the epilepsy network. Further follow-up will be needed to assess the efficacy outcomes of additional intervention in this patient. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24854.</p>","PeriodicalId":94098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons","volume":"9 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE24854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation are increasingly being used to treat drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, patients who experience partial or limited improvement in seizure control could require additional surgical interventions or refinement of their epilepsy network characterization, including further stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) investigations. SEEG in the setting of previously implanted hardware demonstrates a myriad of technical challenges. The authors present the first reported demonstration of SEEG electrode implantation with a preexisting DBS device.
Observations: The patient was a 36-year-old male with a history of severe DRE with focal impaired awareness seizures beginning at 7 years of age. Despite having a bilateral DBS device for the anterior nucleus of the thalamus, he continued to have 1-2 seizures per day and was offered SEEG. The patient tolerated the surgery well without any morbidity, with a successfully improved definition of his epilepsy network. SEEG allowed the medical team to titrate stimulation settings while following intracranial electrographic response.
Lessons: SEEG in the setting of preexisting DBS can be performed safely without damage to functioning hardware, and the authors obtained characterization and localization of the epilepsy network. Further follow-up will be needed to assess the efficacy outcomes of additional intervention in this patient. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24854.