[Thoughts and practices on research and development of new traditional Chinese medicine drugs under "three combined" evaluation evidence system].

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Yu-Qiao Lu, Yao Lu, Geng Li, Tang-You Mao, Ji-Hua Guo, Yong Zhu, Xue Wang, Xiao-Xiao Zhang
{"title":"[Thoughts and practices on research and development of new traditional Chinese medicine drugs under \"three combined\" evaluation evidence system].","authors":"Yu-Qiao Lu, Yao Lu, Geng Li, Tang-You Mao, Ji-Hua Guo, Yong Zhu, Xue Wang, Xiao-Xiao Zhang","doi":"10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20250124.602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the reform of the registration, evaluation, and approval system for traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) has been promoted at the national level, with establishment of an evaluation evidence system for TCM registration that combines TCM theory, human use experience, and clinical trials(known as the &quot;three-combined&quot; evaluation evidence system). This system, which aligns with the characteristics of TCM clinical practice and the laws of TCM research and development, recognizes the unique value of human use experience in medicine and returns to the essence of medicine as an applied science, thus receiving widespread recognition from both academia and industry. However, it meanwhile poses new and higher challenges. This article delves into the value and challenges faced by the &quot;three-combined&quot; evaluation evidence system from three perspectives: registration management, medical institutions, and the TCM industry. Furthermore, it discusses how the China Association of Chinese Medicine, leveraging its academic platform advantages and leading roles, has made exploratory and practical efforts to facilitate the research and development of new TCM drugs and the implementation of the &quot;three-combined&quot; evaluation evidence system.</p>","PeriodicalId":52437,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi","volume":"50 7","pages":"1994-2000"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20250124.602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the reform of the registration, evaluation, and approval system for traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) has been promoted at the national level, with establishment of an evaluation evidence system for TCM registration that combines TCM theory, human use experience, and clinical trials(known as the "three-combined" evaluation evidence system). This system, which aligns with the characteristics of TCM clinical practice and the laws of TCM research and development, recognizes the unique value of human use experience in medicine and returns to the essence of medicine as an applied science, thus receiving widespread recognition from both academia and industry. However, it meanwhile poses new and higher challenges. This article delves into the value and challenges faced by the "three-combined" evaluation evidence system from three perspectives: registration management, medical institutions, and the TCM industry. Furthermore, it discusses how the China Association of Chinese Medicine, leveraging its academic platform advantages and leading roles, has made exploratory and practical efforts to facilitate the research and development of new TCM drugs and the implementation of the "three-combined" evaluation evidence system.

[“三结合”评价证据体系下中药新药研发的思考与实践]。
近年来,在国家层面推进中医药注册、审评、审批制度改革,建立了中医理论、人体使用经验、临床试验相结合的中医药注册评价证据体系(“三结合”)。评价证据体系)。该体系符合中医临床实践特点和中医药研究发展规律,承认人类用药经验的独特价值,回归医学作为一门应用科学的本质,得到了学术界和业界的广泛认可。但同时也提出了新的更高的挑战。本文探讨了“三结合”的价值和面临的挑战。从注册管理、医疗机构和中医药产业三个角度评价证据体系。并论述了中国中医药学会如何发挥学术平台优势和引领作用,为推动中药新药研发和“三结合”实施进行了探索性和实践性的努力。评价证据体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi
Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
581
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信