Improving postnatal social support using antenatal group-based psychoeducation: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1510725
Marta Tessema, Muluemebet Abera, Zewdie Birhanu
{"title":"Improving postnatal social support using antenatal group-based psychoeducation: a cluster randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Marta Tessema, Muluemebet Abera, Zewdie Birhanu","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1510725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate social support is the predominant cause of postnatal depression, which needs to be promoted through interventions. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of antenatal group-based psychoeducation on improving postnatal social support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial design was a cluster randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted on 32 non-adjusted health centers (clusters) among 550 pregnant women. Using simple randomization, health centers were randomized into 16 intervention and 16 control groups. The intervention group received both standard prenatal care and group-based psychoeducation sessions, whereas the control group received standard prenatal care alone. The study included all pregnant women who were between 12 and 20 weeks gestation and had a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 <10 level of depression. We used a functional social support questionnaire in a face-to-face interview to assess social support at 12-20 weeks of gestation and 6 weeks postpartum. An intention-to-treat analysis was done. We used relative risk and a mixed-effects multilevel logistic regression for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Out of 550 enrolled pregnant women, end-line data were collected from 511 participants, with an overall end-line response rate of 92.9%. Statistical analysis revealed that the intervention resulted in a substantial difference in all dimensions of social support between arms, although no difference was detected at baseline. As compared to that in controls, the total postnatal social support in the intervention clusters was considerably higher [190 (66.4%) vs. 88 (33.3%)], <i>P</i> = 0.001). Mothers who were under the intervention arms and received antenatal group-based psychoeducation were 2.04 times more likely to have postnatal social support (RR = 2.044, 95% CI: 1.684-2.481) compared to those who were under the control arms and received the usual care. Finally, mixed-effect analysis indicates that after adjusting for individual and community-level variables, the final model shows the intervention increased the total social support by 3.61 (AOR = 3.61, 95% CI: 2.14-6.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of antenatal group-based psychoeducation intervention resulted in a statistically significant effect in improving postnatal social support. This intervention approach must therefore be implemented and promoted in maternal healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/, identifier (PACTR 202203616584913).</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1510725"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1510725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inadequate social support is the predominant cause of postnatal depression, which needs to be promoted through interventions. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of antenatal group-based psychoeducation on improving postnatal social support.

Methods: The trial design was a cluster randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted on 32 non-adjusted health centers (clusters) among 550 pregnant women. Using simple randomization, health centers were randomized into 16 intervention and 16 control groups. The intervention group received both standard prenatal care and group-based psychoeducation sessions, whereas the control group received standard prenatal care alone. The study included all pregnant women who were between 12 and 20 weeks gestation and had a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 <10 level of depression. We used a functional social support questionnaire in a face-to-face interview to assess social support at 12-20 weeks of gestation and 6 weeks postpartum. An intention-to-treat analysis was done. We used relative risk and a mixed-effects multilevel logistic regression for data analysis.

Result: Out of 550 enrolled pregnant women, end-line data were collected from 511 participants, with an overall end-line response rate of 92.9%. Statistical analysis revealed that the intervention resulted in a substantial difference in all dimensions of social support between arms, although no difference was detected at baseline. As compared to that in controls, the total postnatal social support in the intervention clusters was considerably higher [190 (66.4%) vs. 88 (33.3%)], P = 0.001). Mothers who were under the intervention arms and received antenatal group-based psychoeducation were 2.04 times more likely to have postnatal social support (RR = 2.044, 95% CI: 1.684-2.481) compared to those who were under the control arms and received the usual care. Finally, mixed-effect analysis indicates that after adjusting for individual and community-level variables, the final model shows the intervention increased the total social support by 3.61 (AOR = 3.61, 95% CI: 2.14-6.09).

Conclusion: The implementation of antenatal group-based psychoeducation intervention resulted in a statistically significant effect in improving postnatal social support. This intervention approach must therefore be implemented and promoted in maternal healthcare services.

Clinical trial registration: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/, identifier (PACTR 202203616584913).

利用产前群体心理教育改善产后社会支持:一项随机对照试验。
背景:社会支持不足是产后抑郁症的主要原因,需要通过干预措施加以促进。本研究旨在探讨产前群体心理教育对改善产后社会支持的影响。方法:采用聚类随机对照试验设计。该研究在32个未调整的保健中心(集群)对550名孕妇进行。采用简单随机化方法,将健康中心随机分为16个干预组和16个对照组。干预组接受标准的产前护理和以小组为基础的心理教育,而对照组只接受标准的产前护理。该研究包括所有妊娠12至20周的孕妇,并有患者健康问卷。结果:在550名入组的孕妇中,从511名参与者中收集了终点数据,总体终点响应率为92.9%。统计分析显示,虽然在基线上没有发现差异,但干预措施导致两组之间社会支持的所有方面都有实质性差异。与对照组相比,干预组的产后社会支持总分明显高于对照组[190(66.4%)对88 (33.3%)],P = 0.001)。干预组接受产前群体心理教育的母亲获得产后社会支持的可能性是对照组接受常规护理的母亲的2.04倍(RR = 2.044, 95% CI: 1.684-2.481)。最后,混合效应分析表明,在调整个人和社区层面的变量后,最终模型显示干预使总社会支持增加了3.61 (AOR = 3.61, 95% CI: 2.14-6.09)。结论:实施产前群体心理教育干预对改善产后社会支持有显著的统计学意义。因此,必须在孕产妇保健服务中实施和推广这种干预方法。临床试验注册:https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/,标识符(PACTR 202203616584913)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信