Addressing false information through local capacity building in community-based disaster risk management.

Abstract

The increase in climate-related disasters makes it necessary to address the spread of false information for effective disaster management. While social media can speed up disaster information, false information causes anxiety, fear, and poor decision-making, which affect preparedness and resilience. This study describes how local capacity building can address false information in community-based disaster risk management. The research uses a qualitative approach with secondary data analysis and an integrative literature review. The findings of this study show that there is a need to strengthen local capacity building to prevent the spread of false disaster information to communities and interested parties. The current response to misinformation in disaster situations includes digital literacy and media literacy education to help individuals assess news sources and verify information. It also includes community-based training programmes focusing on disaster preparedness, response, and communication, aiming to reduce the impact of misinformation. Establishing local communication networks, such as community radio stations or messaging groups for reliable alternatives to social media, is also critical to address misinformation. The study also found that trusted local leaders and influencers ensure accuracy, and transparent official channels promote public trust. Furthermore, simulated drills and workshops teach information verification practices, preparing communities to manage misinformation during crises. These efforts, along with local capacity building, are essential in strengthening community resilience and improving disaster management practices.

Contribution: This study contributed to improving disaster management communication with local communities. It strengthened the coordination of disaster information and improved partnerships among stakeholders. It also enhanced collaboration and addressed communication gaps in disaster response.