Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2021.

Lara Zisblatt, Rachel Moquin, Andrew Benckendorf, Dawn Dillman, Amy N DiLorenzo, Ashley E Grantham, Mark P MacEachern, Emily E Peoples, Fei Chen
{"title":"Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2021.","authors":"Lara Zisblatt, Rachel Moquin, Andrew Benckendorf, Dawn Dillman, Amy N DiLorenzo, Ashley E Grantham, Mark P MacEachern, Emily E Peoples, Fei Chen","doi":"10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Chen","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on a review of anesthesiology education articles published in 2021, the authors conducted a critical appraisal to describe trends in the literature, highlight innovations in the field, and identify high-yield articles for clinician educators in anesthesiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a database search (3 Ovid MEDLINE databases, Embase.com, ERIC [via FirstSearch], PsycINFO [via EBSCOhost], and PubMed), abstracts were screened by 2 independent reviewers based on inclusion criteria. Articles representing publications in both anesthesiology-specific journals and general medical education journals were included via manual search. Three randomly assigned raters reviewed and scored each quantitative article using a rubric. Two raters scored qualitative studies using a separate rubric designed for qualitative studies. Each article also received an overall quality rating used to create an additional list of recommended articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database search identified 1141 articles and an additional manual search identified 1497 articles. Of these, 67 articles met the inclusion criteria (61 quantitative, 6 qualitative). This article reports and summarizes the top 13 quantitative articles and top 2 qualitative papers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This year we did not see as many articles describing curriculum to teach learners procedures, a topic heavily present in previous years. Also, analysis revealed an increase in articles focused on nontechnical skill education and a trend toward how to assess learner performance. Finally, 2 articles focused on gender issues in anesthesiology, an emerging area of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"27 1","pages":"E737"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Chen","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Based on a review of anesthesiology education articles published in 2021, the authors conducted a critical appraisal to describe trends in the literature, highlight innovations in the field, and identify high-yield articles for clinician educators in anesthesiology.

Methods: After a database search (3 Ovid MEDLINE databases, Embase.com, ERIC [via FirstSearch], PsycINFO [via EBSCOhost], and PubMed), abstracts were screened by 2 independent reviewers based on inclusion criteria. Articles representing publications in both anesthesiology-specific journals and general medical education journals were included via manual search. Three randomly assigned raters reviewed and scored each quantitative article using a rubric. Two raters scored qualitative studies using a separate rubric designed for qualitative studies. Each article also received an overall quality rating used to create an additional list of recommended articles.

Results: The database search identified 1141 articles and an additional manual search identified 1497 articles. Of these, 67 articles met the inclusion criteria (61 quantitative, 6 qualitative). This article reports and summarizes the top 13 quantitative articles and top 2 qualitative papers.

Conclusions: This year we did not see as many articles describing curriculum to teach learners procedures, a topic heavily present in previous years. Also, analysis revealed an increase in articles focused on nontechnical skill education and a trend toward how to assess learner performance. Finally, 2 articles focused on gender issues in anesthesiology, an emerging area of interest.

2021年麻醉学教育研究述评
背景:基于对2021年发表的麻醉学教育文章的回顾,作者进行了批判性评估,以描述文献趋势,突出该领域的创新,并为麻醉学临床医生教育工作者确定高收益的文章。方法:检索数据库(3个Ovid MEDLINE数据库、Embase.com、ERIC[通过FirstSearch]、PsycINFO[通过EBSCOhost]和PubMed)后,由2名独立审稿人根据纳入标准对摘要进行筛选。在麻醉学专业期刊和普通医学教育期刊上发表的文章通过人工检索纳入。三名随机分配的评分员使用一个标题对每篇定量文章进行审查和评分。两名评分员使用为定性研究设计的单独标准对定性研究进行评分。每篇文章还会收到一个总体质量评级,用于创建一个额外的推荐文章列表。结果:数据库检索确定了1141篇文章,另外手工检索确定了1497篇文章。其中67篇文章符合纳入标准(61篇定量,6篇定性)。本文对排名前13位的定量论文和排名前2位的定性论文进行了报道和总结。结论:今年,我们没有看到那么多的文章描述课程来教学习者的过程,一个话题在前几年大量出现。此外,分析还显示,关注非技术技能教育的文章有所增加,并出现了如何评估学习者表现的趋势。最后,两篇文章关注麻醉学中的性别问题,这是一个新兴的兴趣领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信