Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Eosinophilic Exacerbations of COPD.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Matthew Donnan, Tong Lei Liu, Matthew Gvalda, Xinye Chen, Chuan T Foo, Martin Ian MacDonald, Francis Thien
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Eosinophilic Exacerbations of COPD.","authors":"Matthew Donnan, Tong Lei Liu, Matthew Gvalda, Xinye Chen, Chuan T Foo, Martin Ian MacDonald, Francis Thien","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S485246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of eosinophilic inflammation in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasingly recognised. Eosinophilic exacerbations have previously been associated with shorter hospital length of stay and lower inpatient mortality. The objective of this study was to examine clinical characteristics of hospitalised COPD exacerbations stratified by admission eosinophil count.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of exacerbations of COPD at an Australian tertiary health service between 1<sup>st</sup> October 2019 and 30<sup>th</sup> September 2020 that were identified using ICD-10 discharge codes. Patients were excluded if they received any systemic corticosteroids prior to hospitalisation. Admissions were stratified according to blood eosinophil count as high eosinophil (HE, ≥2% total white blood cell count), or low eosinophil (LE, <2%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and six patients were analysed. HE patients were younger (74.7 vs 77.7 years, p=0.001) and had fewer co-morbidities (1 [1-2] vs 2 [1-3], p=0.044). Patients with HE were less likely to be taking inhaled corticosteroids (59% vs 71%, p=0.017). HE exacerbations had a higher blood eosinophil count (0.31 vs 0.06 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, p<0.0001), lower total white cell count (8.45 vs 10.6, p<0.001), lower CRP (10.4 vs 26.7, p<0.001), fewer infections (29.5% vs 52.1%, p<0.001) and less oxygen requirement (35.2% vs 46.8%, p=0.036). HE exacerbations had a shorter length of stay (3.56 vs 4.40 days, p=0.047) but similar inpatient mortality.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Eosinophilic exacerbations of COPD were phenotypically different, affect a younger, less co-morbid population and were associated with shorter length of stay. This may be useful to help prognosticate clinical outcomes and guide clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"1061-1070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S485246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of eosinophilic inflammation in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasingly recognised. Eosinophilic exacerbations have previously been associated with shorter hospital length of stay and lower inpatient mortality. The objective of this study was to examine clinical characteristics of hospitalised COPD exacerbations stratified by admission eosinophil count.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of exacerbations of COPD at an Australian tertiary health service between 1st October 2019 and 30th September 2020 that were identified using ICD-10 discharge codes. Patients were excluded if they received any systemic corticosteroids prior to hospitalisation. Admissions were stratified according to blood eosinophil count as high eosinophil (HE, ≥2% total white blood cell count), or low eosinophil (LE, <2%).

Results: Four hundred and six patients were analysed. HE patients were younger (74.7 vs 77.7 years, p=0.001) and had fewer co-morbidities (1 [1-2] vs 2 [1-3], p=0.044). Patients with HE were less likely to be taking inhaled corticosteroids (59% vs 71%, p=0.017). HE exacerbations had a higher blood eosinophil count (0.31 vs 0.06 × 109/L, p<0.0001), lower total white cell count (8.45 vs 10.6, p<0.001), lower CRP (10.4 vs 26.7, p<0.001), fewer infections (29.5% vs 52.1%, p<0.001) and less oxygen requirement (35.2% vs 46.8%, p=0.036). HE exacerbations had a shorter length of stay (3.56 vs 4.40 days, p=0.047) but similar inpatient mortality.

Discussion: Eosinophilic exacerbations of COPD were phenotypically different, affect a younger, less co-morbid population and were associated with shorter length of stay. This may be useful to help prognosticate clinical outcomes and guide clinical management.

慢性阻塞性肺病嗜酸性粒细胞加重的临床特点和结局。
嗜酸性粒细胞炎症在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)恶化中的作用越来越被认识到。嗜酸性粒细胞加重与较短的住院时间和较低的住院死亡率有关。本研究的目的是通过入院嗜酸性粒细胞计数分层检查住院COPD加重的临床特征。方法:我们对2019年10月1日至2020年9月30日期间澳大利亚三级卫生服务机构的COPD加重进行了一项回顾性队列研究,这些加重使用ICD-10出院代码进行了识别。如果患者在住院前接受过全身性皮质类固醇治疗,则排除在外。根据血中嗜酸性粒细胞计数将入院患者分为高嗜酸性粒细胞(HE,白细胞总数≥2%)和低嗜酸性粒细胞(LE)。结果:共分析了246例患者。HE患者更年轻(74.7 vs 77.7岁,p=0.001),合并症更少(1 [1-2]vs 2 [1-3], p=0.044)。HE患者吸入皮质类固醇的可能性较低(59% vs 71%, p=0.017)。HE加重时有更高的血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(0.31 vs 0.06 × 109/L, p)讨论:COPD嗜酸性粒细胞加重在表型上不同,影响更年轻、合并症较少的人群,并与更短的住院时间相关。这可能有助于预测临床结果和指导临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信