{"title":"Becoming fluent overnight: Long-lasting influences of perceptual learning on metamemory.","authors":"Skylar J Laursen, Chris M Fiacconi","doi":"10.1037/cep0000375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Judgements of learning (JOLs) are metacognitive evaluations of future memory for newly learned information (Fiacconi et al., 2020; Koriat, 1997). The cue utilization view of JOLs states that individuals use a variety of cues when predicting future memory performance (Koriat, 1997). Critically, however, the majority of research aimed at understanding how different types of cues influence individuals' JOLs has focused on immediate memory assessments based on individuals' in-the-moment experiences or has utilized very brief retention intervals and relied on the representation of previously studied material (Rhodes & Tauber, 2011). Importantly, individuals' assessments of new learning may also be coloured by information learned further in the past when it is similar to the current information. Using a letter set training procedure (Fiacconi et al., 2020), we manipulated the fluency of to-be-learned material to examine whether previous learning would influence JOLs for new material over a 24-hr time period. As hypothesized, our results showed that previous learning did impact individuals' metamemory predictions, as JOLs for distinct but similar items were indeed higher than those for novel dissimilar items both immediately following training and 24 hr later. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Judgements of learning (JOLs) are metacognitive evaluations of future memory for newly learned information (Fiacconi et al., 2020; Koriat, 1997). The cue utilization view of JOLs states that individuals use a variety of cues when predicting future memory performance (Koriat, 1997). Critically, however, the majority of research aimed at understanding how different types of cues influence individuals' JOLs has focused on immediate memory assessments based on individuals' in-the-moment experiences or has utilized very brief retention intervals and relied on the representation of previously studied material (Rhodes & Tauber, 2011). Importantly, individuals' assessments of new learning may also be coloured by information learned further in the past when it is similar to the current information. Using a letter set training procedure (Fiacconi et al., 2020), we manipulated the fluency of to-be-learned material to examine whether previous learning would influence JOLs for new material over a 24-hr time period. As hypothesized, our results showed that previous learning did impact individuals' metamemory predictions, as JOLs for distinct but similar items were indeed higher than those for novel dissimilar items both immediately following training and 24 hr later. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology publishes original research papers that advance understanding of the field of experimental psychology, broadly considered. This includes, but is not restricted to, cognition, perception, motor performance, attention, memory, learning, language, decision making, development, comparative psychology, and neuroscience. The journal publishes - papers reporting empirical results that advance knowledge in a particular research area; - papers describing theoretical, methodological, or conceptual advances that are relevant to the interpretation of empirical evidence in the field; - brief reports (less than 2,500 words for the main text) that describe new results or analyses with clear theoretical or methodological import.