Setting the Tolerance and Action Limit for Patient-specific Quality Assurance of Craniospinal Irradiation Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: Based on AAPM TG-218 Report.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_156_24
Sathiya Raj, Sathiyan Saminathan, Kiruthika Prakasam
{"title":"Setting the Tolerance and Action Limit for Patient-specific Quality Assurance of Craniospinal Irradiation Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: Based on AAPM TG-218 Report.","authors":"Sathiya Raj, Sathiyan Saminathan, Kiruthika Prakasam","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_156_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the tolerance limits (TL) and action limits (AL) in gamma passing rate for craniospinal irradiation volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were planned using the VMAT technique; plans were delivered on an Elekta Versa HD. The delivered fluence was recorded by PTW 2D array, and the gamma passing rate (%GP) was analyzed using PTW VeriSoft. The universal TL and AL from TG 218 were applied to analyze the %GP for each plan. As per AAPM TG 218, a statistical process control of %GP was performed to set the TL and AL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average %GP for the brain, upper spine, and lower spine was 98.4%, 98.8%, and 98.4%, respectively. The TL and AL for the brain, upper spine, and lower spine were TL: 95.1%, 95.1% and 94.8%, and AL: 89.7%, 89.3%, and 86.7%, respectively. The analysis of variance test showed that the <i>P</i> value in %GP among the brain, upper spine, and lower spine was >0.1679. The %GP rate between the sites was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AAPM TG 218 guidelines are more suitable for establishing TL and AL for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) VMAT plans. This study suggests that a single value of TL and AL for CSI plans, rather than site-specific values, could be suitable for monitoring CSI patient-specific quality assurance trends and the same can be utilized.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"50 1","pages":"155-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_156_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the tolerance limits (TL) and action limits (AL) in gamma passing rate for craniospinal irradiation volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans.

Materials and methods: Twenty-eight patients were planned using the VMAT technique; plans were delivered on an Elekta Versa HD. The delivered fluence was recorded by PTW 2D array, and the gamma passing rate (%GP) was analyzed using PTW VeriSoft. The universal TL and AL from TG 218 were applied to analyze the %GP for each plan. As per AAPM TG 218, a statistical process control of %GP was performed to set the TL and AL.

Results: The average %GP for the brain, upper spine, and lower spine was 98.4%, 98.8%, and 98.4%, respectively. The TL and AL for the brain, upper spine, and lower spine were TL: 95.1%, 95.1% and 94.8%, and AL: 89.7%, 89.3%, and 86.7%, respectively. The analysis of variance test showed that the P value in %GP among the brain, upper spine, and lower spine was >0.1679. The %GP rate between the sites was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: AAPM TG 218 guidelines are more suitable for establishing TL and AL for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) VMAT plans. This study suggests that a single value of TL and AL for CSI plans, rather than site-specific values, could be suitable for monitoring CSI patient-specific quality assurance trends and the same can be utilized.

设定颅脊柱放射量调弧线治疗患者特异性质量保证的耐受性和作用极限:基于AAPM TG-218报告。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨脑脊髓放射量调弧线治疗(VMAT)方案中伽马通过率的耐受极限(TL)和作用极限(AL)。材料与方法:28例患者计划采用VMAT技术;平面图是在Elekta Versa HD上交付的。通过PTW二维阵列记录输送的通量,使用PTW VeriSoft分析伽马通过率(%GP)。应用TG 218的通用TL和AL分析各方案的%GP。结果:脑、上、下脊柱的平均GP值分别为98.4%、98.8%和98.4%。结果:脑、上、下脊柱的平均GP值分别为98.4%、98.8%和98.4%。脑、上脊柱和下脊柱的TL和AL分别为TL: 95.1%、95.1%和94.8%,AL: 89.7%、89.3%和86.7%。方差检验分析显示,脑、上脊柱、下脊柱%GP的P值为0.1679。两组间的GP率差异无统计学意义。结论:AAPM TG 218指南更适合于建立颅脑辐照(CSI) VMAT计划的TL和AL。本研究表明,CSI计划的单一TL和AL值,而不是特定地点的值,可能适合于监测CSI患者特定的质量保证趋势,并且可以使用相同的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信