Exploring the Impact of the Physical Environment on Robotic-Assisted Surgery Outcomes and Processes: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sara Kennedy, Patrick Fuller, Jackie S Cha, Alfredo M Carbonell, Qi Luo, Anjali Joseph
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of the Physical Environment on Robotic-Assisted Surgery Outcomes and Processes: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sara Kennedy, Patrick Fuller, Jackie S Cha, Alfredo M Carbonell, Qi Luo, Anjali Joseph","doi":"10.1177/00187208251333907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe purpose of this scoping review is to identify physical environmental facilitators and barriers related to performing robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in operating rooms (ORs).BackgroundAs new robotic surgery technology is developed and brought to market, there is a need to understand how existing and future operating rooms are adapted and designed to support patient safety, surgical workflow, and teamwork. This review will focus on literature related to physical environment factors that impact workflow and communication, as well as the adoption of RAS technology.MethodThe scoping review search was conducted during November 2022, following the PRISMA guidelines. An independent reviewer screened articles for inclusion and exclusion and two independent reviewers completed a quality appraisal was on the included articles.ResultsOf the 9325 texts screened, 28 articles were included for analysis. The primary physical environment and outcome variables were extracted and synthesized under the following categories: RAS process or task-related, environmental features, environmental qualities, and staff or patient outcomes.ConclusionThe physical environment of the OR, such as OR layout, OR size, environmental noise, and dedicated robotic ORs played a significant role in efficiency and workflow outcomes for RAS, as well as workload measures, staff and patient safety, and surgical performance.ApplicationSince there are minimal evidence-based resources available for the application of RAS, this review provides distinct connections between RAS outcomes and specific environmental features for considerations among design researchers, architects, human factors professionals, hospital administrators, and practitioners to aid in decision making during and after implementation of RAS technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208251333907"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251333907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe purpose of this scoping review is to identify physical environmental facilitators and barriers related to performing robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in operating rooms (ORs).BackgroundAs new robotic surgery technology is developed and brought to market, there is a need to understand how existing and future operating rooms are adapted and designed to support patient safety, surgical workflow, and teamwork. This review will focus on literature related to physical environment factors that impact workflow and communication, as well as the adoption of RAS technology.MethodThe scoping review search was conducted during November 2022, following the PRISMA guidelines. An independent reviewer screened articles for inclusion and exclusion and two independent reviewers completed a quality appraisal was on the included articles.ResultsOf the 9325 texts screened, 28 articles were included for analysis. The primary physical environment and outcome variables were extracted and synthesized under the following categories: RAS process or task-related, environmental features, environmental qualities, and staff or patient outcomes.ConclusionThe physical environment of the OR, such as OR layout, OR size, environmental noise, and dedicated robotic ORs played a significant role in efficiency and workflow outcomes for RAS, as well as workload measures, staff and patient safety, and surgical performance.ApplicationSince there are minimal evidence-based resources available for the application of RAS, this review provides distinct connections between RAS outcomes and specific environmental features for considerations among design researchers, architects, human factors professionals, hospital administrators, and practitioners to aid in decision making during and after implementation of RAS technology.

探索物理环境对机器人辅助手术结果和过程的影响:范围审查。
目的本综述的目的是确定在手术室(ORs)中进行机器人辅助手术(RAS)的物理环境促进因素和障碍。随着新的机器人手术技术的发展和推向市场,有必要了解现有和未来的手术室如何适应和设计,以支持患者安全,手术工作流程和团队合作。本文将重点关注影响工作流程和沟通的物理环境因素以及RAS技术的采用相关的文献。方法根据PRISMA指南,于2022年11月进行范围综述检索。一名独立审稿人筛选了纳入和排除的文章,两名独立审稿人完成了对纳入文章的质量评估。结果筛选的9325篇文献中,有28篇纳入分析。主要物理环境和结果变量被提取并合成为以下类别:RAS过程或任务相关、环境特征、环境质量、工作人员或患者结果。结论手术室的物理环境,如手术室布局、手术室大小、环境噪声和专用机器人手术室对RAS的效率和工作流程结果、工作量措施、工作人员和患者的安全以及手术效果都有重要影响。由于可用于RAS应用的循证资源很少,本综述提供了RAS结果与特定环境特征之间的明显联系,供设计研究人员、建筑师、人为因素专业人员、医院管理人员和从业人员考虑,以帮助在实施RAS技术期间和之后做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信