Ali Mortezaei, Mohamed Emara, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Forough Yazdanian, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Adam A Dmytriw, Redi Rahmani, David S Liebeskind
{"title":"Edaravone dexborneol for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ali Mortezaei, Mohamed Emara, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Forough Yazdanian, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Adam A Dmytriw, Redi Rahmani, David S Liebeskind","doi":"10.1177/19714009251340319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEdaravone dexborneol has been developed as a novel neuroprotective agent and showed a promising result in treatment of stroke. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the edaravone dexborneol in the treatment of stroke.MethodWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature in four electronic databases. Binary outcomes were analyzed through the risks ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), while the continuous outcomes were analyzed through the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI. Also, we did a subgroup analysis to show more feasibility and safety dimensions.ResultsFive studies with a total of 2415 patients were included. There were 1119 patients in edaravone dexborneol group and 1216 patients in control group. The 90-mRS 0-1 (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.09-1.25]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.18]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) were statistically significant higher in intervention group compared with control group. There was no significant difference between intervention group and control group concerning 90-day mRS 0-3 (RR 1.03 [95% CI 0.99-1.06]; <i>p</i> = 0.07), 90-day mortality rate (RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.45-1.11]; <i>p</i> = 0.13), serious adverse events (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.72-1.16]; <i>p</i> = 0.45), and NIHSS score ≤1 at days 14 (RR 0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.69), 30 (RR 1.08; <i>p</i> = 0.18), and 90 (RR 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.15). No heterogeneity in treatment effect was seen in the analysis, and any potential discrepancies were addressed by sensitivity analysis.ConclusionEdaravone dexborneol can be a favorable treatment option for patients with stroke. However, more randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251340319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251340319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundEdaravone dexborneol has been developed as a novel neuroprotective agent and showed a promising result in treatment of stroke. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the edaravone dexborneol in the treatment of stroke.MethodWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature in four electronic databases. Binary outcomes were analyzed through the risks ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), while the continuous outcomes were analyzed through the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI. Also, we did a subgroup analysis to show more feasibility and safety dimensions.ResultsFive studies with a total of 2415 patients were included. There were 1119 patients in edaravone dexborneol group and 1216 patients in control group. The 90-mRS 0-1 (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.09-1.25]; p < 0.0001) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.18]; p < 0.0001) were statistically significant higher in intervention group compared with control group. There was no significant difference between intervention group and control group concerning 90-day mRS 0-3 (RR 1.03 [95% CI 0.99-1.06]; p = 0.07), 90-day mortality rate (RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.45-1.11]; p = 0.13), serious adverse events (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.72-1.16]; p = 0.45), and NIHSS score ≤1 at days 14 (RR 0.96; p = 0.69), 30 (RR 1.08; p = 0.18), and 90 (RR 1.06; p = 0.15). No heterogeneity in treatment effect was seen in the analysis, and any potential discrepancies were addressed by sensitivity analysis.ConclusionEdaravone dexborneol can be a favorable treatment option for patients with stroke. However, more randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.
期刊介绍:
NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.