Infant Reference Intervals-Steps Towards Improving the Supportive Data for Result Interpretation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1111/apa.70095
Sara Marie Larsson
{"title":"Infant Reference Intervals-Steps Towards Improving the Supportive Data for Result Interpretation.","authors":"Sara Marie Larsson","doi":"10.1111/apa.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To fully take advantage of blood test results, comparative data are required. Today, the reference interval is a commonly used concept. This review aims to summarise the current state of reference intervals, focusing on infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature on reference percentiles (birth to 12 months of age) published from January 1950 until November 2024 was reviewed. Search terms comprised paediatric, infant, or neonatal reference intervals and similar terminology. Furthermore, reference interval data in current clinical use were investigated by searching 7 Nordic laboratory websites for three routinely used biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During infancy, the levels of several biomarkers change rapidly with development and growth. Conventionally used techniques for deriving reference intervals have limitations and require extensive blood samplings. New approaches basing reference limits on mathematically trimmed data from laboratory systems have emerged. Due to the risk of modelling pathological data, the results of these studies need verification. Recently published Nordic reference interval data, based on healthy infants and defined on specified time points, could present new opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infant reference interval methodology requires particular consideration. The currently observed heterogeneity in this area calls for further methodological investigations, improved concepts, harmonisation activities, and software development.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To fully take advantage of blood test results, comparative data are required. Today, the reference interval is a commonly used concept. This review aims to summarise the current state of reference intervals, focusing on infants.

Methods: Literature on reference percentiles (birth to 12 months of age) published from January 1950 until November 2024 was reviewed. Search terms comprised paediatric, infant, or neonatal reference intervals and similar terminology. Furthermore, reference interval data in current clinical use were investigated by searching 7 Nordic laboratory websites for three routinely used biomarkers.

Results: During infancy, the levels of several biomarkers change rapidly with development and growth. Conventionally used techniques for deriving reference intervals have limitations and require extensive blood samplings. New approaches basing reference limits on mathematically trimmed data from laboratory systems have emerged. Due to the risk of modelling pathological data, the results of these studies need verification. Recently published Nordic reference interval data, based on healthy infants and defined on specified time points, could present new opportunities.

Conclusion: Infant reference interval methodology requires particular consideration. The currently observed heterogeneity in this area calls for further methodological investigations, improved concepts, harmonisation activities, and software development.

婴儿参考间隔-改善结果解释支持数据的步骤。
目的:为了充分利用血液检测结果,需要比较数据。今天,参考区间是一个常用的概念。这篇综述旨在总结参考间隔的现状,重点是婴儿。方法:回顾1950年1月至2024年11月发表的有关参考百分位数(出生至12个月)的文献。搜索词包括儿科,婴儿,或新生儿参考间隔和类似的术语。此外,通过搜索7个北欧实验室网站,对目前临床使用的参考区间数据进行了调查,以获取三种常规使用的生物标志物。结果:在婴儿期,几种生物标志物的水平随着发育和生长迅速变化。传统上用于确定参考区间的技术有局限性,而且需要大量的血液采样。新的方法基于参考限制从实验室系统的数学修剪数据已经出现。由于建模病理数据的风险,这些研究的结果需要验证。最近公布的北欧参考间隔数据,以健康婴儿为基础,在特定时间点确定,可能带来新的机会。结论:婴儿参考区间方法需要特别考虑。目前在这一领域观察到的异质性要求进一步的方法调查、改进概念、协调活动和软件开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信