Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis with potential clinical predictors.

IF 1.3
Dongmei Dai, Hai Gong, Cong Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis with potential clinical predictors.","authors":"Dongmei Dai, Hai Gong, Cong Zhang","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_964_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy (RT) has shown promise in improving the outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; however, the potential benefits and predictors remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICI + RT compared to RT or ICI monotherapy and explored the potential factors influencing the treatment efficacy of this combination therapy. The efficacy was assessed using hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable data were pooled, and subgroup analyses were performed to identify the influencing factors. The safety was evaluated using odds ratios (OR) of any grade and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). ICI + RT significantly improved the OS of patients with brain metastases compared to RT alone (HR = 0.42; P = 0.004). The combination therapy showed improved OS (HR = 0.71; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 0.69; P < 0.001) compared to ICI monotherapy. Subgroup analysis revealed significant survival benefits in metastatic and oligometastatic NSCLC patients receiving sequential ICI after RT and those undergoing intracranial or extracranial RT. ICI + RT increased the incidence of any grade TRAEs (OR = 1.3; P = 0.007) compared to ICI alone; no significant difference was observed in grade ≥3 TRAEs. ICI + RT provides significant survival benefits over monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, with a manageable toxicity profile. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine patient selection for combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 2","pages":"334-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_964_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy (RT) has shown promise in improving the outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; however, the potential benefits and predictors remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICI + RT compared to RT or ICI monotherapy and explored the potential factors influencing the treatment efficacy of this combination therapy. The efficacy was assessed using hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable data were pooled, and subgroup analyses were performed to identify the influencing factors. The safety was evaluated using odds ratios (OR) of any grade and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). ICI + RT significantly improved the OS of patients with brain metastases compared to RT alone (HR = 0.42; P = 0.004). The combination therapy showed improved OS (HR = 0.71; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 0.69; P < 0.001) compared to ICI monotherapy. Subgroup analysis revealed significant survival benefits in metastatic and oligometastatic NSCLC patients receiving sequential ICI after RT and those undergoing intracranial or extracranial RT. ICI + RT increased the incidence of any grade TRAEs (OR = 1.3; P = 0.007) compared to ICI alone; no significant difference was observed in grade ≥3 TRAEs. ICI + RT provides significant survival benefits over monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, with a manageable toxicity profile. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine patient selection for combination therapy.

免疫检查点抑制剂联合放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项具有潜在临床预测因素的荟萃分析
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合放疗(RT)有望改善非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预后;然而,潜在的好处和预测因素仍不清楚。本荟萃分析评估了ICI + RT与RT或ICI单药治疗的疗效和安全性,并探讨了影响该联合治疗疗效的潜在因素。使用无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(HR)评估疗效。对多变量数据进行汇总,并进行亚组分析以确定影响因素。使用任何级别和≥3级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)的优势比(OR)评估安全性。与单纯放疗相比,ICI + RT显著改善脑转移患者的OS (HR = 0.42;P = 0.004)。联合治疗改善了OS (HR = 0.71;P < 0.001)和PFS (HR = 0.69;P < 0.001)。亚组分析显示,转移性和低转移性NSCLC患者在RT后接受序次ICI以及接受颅内或颅外RT的患者的生存获益显著。P = 0.007);≥3级trae无显著性差异。与单药治疗相比,ICI + RT在晚期非小细胞肺癌中提供了显著的生存优势,并且毒性谱可控。需要前瞻性试验来验证这些发现,并优化患者选择联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信