"You can't incarcerate yourself out of the drug problem in America:" A qualitative examination of Colorado's 2022 Fentanyl​ criminalization law.

IF 3 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Katherine LeMasters, Samantha Nall, Cole Jurecka, Betsy Craft, Paul Christine, Ingrid Binswanger, Joshua Barocas
{"title":"\"You can't incarcerate yourself out of the drug problem in America:\" A qualitative examination of Colorado's 2022 Fentanyl​ criminalization law.","authors":"Katherine LeMasters, Samantha Nall, Cole Jurecka, Betsy Craft, Paul Christine, Ingrid Binswanger, Joshua Barocas","doi":"10.1186/s40352-025-00334-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to the U.S. overdose crisis, many states have increased criminal penalties for drug possession, particularly fentanyl. This study sought to qualitatively explore diverse community perspectives on increasing criminal legal penalties in Colorado for fentanyl possession (House Bill 22-1326) and the broader role of the criminal legal system in addressing substance use and overdose prevention. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews in 2023 with community leaders directly working with people who use drugs, individuals with lived experience with drug use and the criminal legal system, and law enforcement throughout Colorado. Interviewees were asked about the perceived impact of House Bill 22-1326 on their communities and agencies. After interviews were complete, we created templated summaries and matrix analyses to conduct rapid qualitative analysis, an action-oriented approach to qualitative data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents included peer support specialists (n = 7), policymakers (n = 6), community behavioral health/harm reduction providers (n = 6), criminal legal program staff (n = 8), and law enforcement (n = 4), with nine participants from rural counties. Analysis revealed that participants found increasing criminal penalties for fentanyl possession to be misguided: \"And the felony [of HB-1326] is such a good example of a policy being led by feelings rather than evidence.\" This was in the context of participants' divergent views on police as conduits to treatment and punishment and perceiving jail as an (in)appropriate response for substance use disorder treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All participants supported policy efforts to prevent fatal fentanyl overdoses, yet, most thought that increased use of police and incarceration as avenues to prevent overdose was misguided. This study highlights a diverse array of community perspectives that can inform policy decisions concerning criminal penalties for fentanyl possession and distribution and can inform policies that affect people who use drugs broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"13 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00334-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In response to the U.S. overdose crisis, many states have increased criminal penalties for drug possession, particularly fentanyl. This study sought to qualitatively explore diverse community perspectives on increasing criminal legal penalties in Colorado for fentanyl possession (House Bill 22-1326) and the broader role of the criminal legal system in addressing substance use and overdose prevention. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews in 2023 with community leaders directly working with people who use drugs, individuals with lived experience with drug use and the criminal legal system, and law enforcement throughout Colorado. Interviewees were asked about the perceived impact of House Bill 22-1326 on their communities and agencies. After interviews were complete, we created templated summaries and matrix analyses to conduct rapid qualitative analysis, an action-oriented approach to qualitative data analysis.

Results: Respondents included peer support specialists (n = 7), policymakers (n = 6), community behavioral health/harm reduction providers (n = 6), criminal legal program staff (n = 8), and law enforcement (n = 4), with nine participants from rural counties. Analysis revealed that participants found increasing criminal penalties for fentanyl possession to be misguided: "And the felony [of HB-1326] is such a good example of a policy being led by feelings rather than evidence." This was in the context of participants' divergent views on police as conduits to treatment and punishment and perceiving jail as an (in)appropriate response for substance use disorder treatment.

Conclusions: All participants supported policy efforts to prevent fatal fentanyl overdoses, yet, most thought that increased use of police and incarceration as avenues to prevent overdose was misguided. This study highlights a diverse array of community perspectives that can inform policy decisions concerning criminal penalties for fentanyl possession and distribution and can inform policies that affect people who use drugs broadly.

“在美国,你不能把自己关在毒品问题之外:”对科罗拉多州2022年芬太尼定罪法的定性检查。
背景:为了应对美国的过量危机,许多州增加了对持有毒品的刑事处罚,特别是芬太尼。本研究旨在定性地探讨科罗拉多州对芬太尼持有(众议院法案22-1326)增加刑事法律处罚的不同社区观点,以及刑事法律制度在解决物质使用和过量预防方面的更广泛作用。我们在2023年进行了31次半结构化访谈,访谈对象包括直接与吸毒者打交道的社区领袖、有吸毒和刑事法律体系经历的个人,以及科罗拉多州的执法部门。受访者被问及众议院22-1326号法案对他们的社区和机构的影响。访谈完成后,我们创建模板总结和矩阵分析,进行快速定性分析,这是一种以行动为导向的定性数据分析方法。结果:受访者包括同伴支持专家(n = 7)、政策制定者(n = 6)、社区行为健康/减少伤害提供者(n = 6)、刑事法律方案工作人员(n = 8)和执法人员(n = 4),其中9名参与者来自农村县。分析显示,参与者发现增加对芬太尼持有的刑事处罚是错误的:“[HB-1326]重罪是一个很好的例子,表明政策是由感觉而不是证据主导的。”这是在与会者对警察是治疗和惩罚的渠道以及认为监禁是治疗药物使用障碍的适当反应的不同看法的背景下进行的。结论:所有参与者都支持防止致命芬太尼过量使用的政策努力,然而,大多数人认为增加使用警察和监禁作为防止过量使用的途径是错误的。这项研究强调了一系列不同的社区观点,这些观点可以为芬太尼持有和分销的刑事处罚决策提供信息,并可以为广泛影响吸毒者的政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信