Comparison of high- and low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) Pub Date : 2025-05-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20241815
İsmail Ceylan, Büşra Kürtüncüoğlu, Figen Tuncay, Mehmet Canli, Halil Alkan, Abdulhamit Tayfur
{"title":"Comparison of high- and low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome.","authors":"İsmail Ceylan, Büşra Kürtüncüoğlu, Figen Tuncay, Mehmet Canli, Halil Alkan, Abdulhamit Tayfur","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20241815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy administered at low vs. high pressures in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized into two groups: low-dose group and high-dose group. Each patient underwent a total of four sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, administered once a week. The radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was delivered at 4.0 bars for the high-dose group and 1.5 bars for the low-dose group. Both groups received conventional physical therapy program consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, paraffin wax, orthoses, and tendon gliding exercises, three times per week over a 4-week duration. Outcome measures included pain levels, hand grip strength, pinch strength, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, and nerve conduction studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited improvements across all measures, except for the nerve conduction studies parameters. In the intragroup analysis, statistically significant differences were observed with small-to-moderate effect sizes for median motor distal latency, median sensory nerve conduction velocity, median sensory distal latency, and the Boston functional status subscale, all favoring the high-dose group (p<0.05). In the low-dose group, a statistically significant difference with a moderate effect size was noted solely for hand grip strength (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was significantly better than low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy with small-to-moderate effect sizes in the recovery of the function and nerve conduction studies parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registry: </strong>The study was registered on the Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: NCT05681663).</p>","PeriodicalId":94194,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","volume":"71 3","pages":"e20241815"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20241815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy administered at low vs. high pressures in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods: Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized into two groups: low-dose group and high-dose group. Each patient underwent a total of four sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, administered once a week. The radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was delivered at 4.0 bars for the high-dose group and 1.5 bars for the low-dose group. Both groups received conventional physical therapy program consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, paraffin wax, orthoses, and tendon gliding exercises, three times per week over a 4-week duration. Outcome measures included pain levels, hand grip strength, pinch strength, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, and nerve conduction studies.

Results: Both groups exhibited improvements across all measures, except for the nerve conduction studies parameters. In the intragroup analysis, statistically significant differences were observed with small-to-moderate effect sizes for median motor distal latency, median sensory nerve conduction velocity, median sensory distal latency, and the Boston functional status subscale, all favoring the high-dose group (p<0.05). In the low-dose group, a statistically significant difference with a moderate effect size was noted solely for hand grip strength (p<0.05).

Conclusion: High-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was significantly better than low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy with small-to-moderate effect sizes in the recovery of the function and nerve conduction studies parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Clinical trials registry: The study was registered on the Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: NCT05681663).

高、低剂量桡骨体外冲击波治疗腕管综合征的比较。
目的:本研究的目的是比较桡骨体外冲击波治疗在低压和高压下对腕管综合征患者的疗效。方法:将腕管综合征患者随机分为低剂量组和高剂量组。每位患者共接受四次放射状体外冲击波治疗,每周一次。桡骨体外冲击波治疗高剂量组为4.0 bar,低剂量组为1.5 bar。两组均接受常规物理治疗方案,包括经皮神经电刺激、石蜡、矫形器和肌腱滑动练习,每周3次,持续4周。结果测量包括疼痛水平、手握力、捏力、波士顿腕管综合征问卷和神经传导研究。结果:除了神经传导研究参数外,两组在所有测量中均表现出改善。在组内分析中,中位运动远端潜伏期、中位感觉神经传导速度、中位感觉远端潜伏期和波士顿功能状态亚量表的小到中等效应量差异有统计学意义,均倾向于高剂量组(p)。在腕管综合征患者的功能恢复和神经传导研究参数方面,高剂量桡骨体外冲击波治疗明显优于小至中等效应的低剂量桡骨体外冲击波治疗。临床试验注册:本研究已在临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:NCT05681663)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信