Age-related differences in trust decisions: when memory fails and appearances prevail.

Camilla van Geen, Michael S Cohen, Karolina M Lempert, Kameron A MacNear, Frances M Reckers, Laura Zaneski, David A Wolk, Joseph W Kable
{"title":"Age-related differences in trust decisions: when memory fails and appearances prevail.","authors":"Camilla van Geen, Michael S Cohen, Karolina M Lempert, Kameron A MacNear, Frances M Reckers, Laura Zaneski, David A Wolk, Joseph W Kable","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults are frequent victims of scams, possibly due to biases in how they decide whom to trust. Indeed, older adults' decisions are more likely to be influenced by how generous a person looks and less so by their memory for how this person behaved. Here, we leverage functional magnetic resonance imaging data to clarify the mechanism by which this age-dependent difference emerges. Eighty-six participants learned how much of a $10 endowment an individual shared in a dictator game, and then made decisions about whom to play another round with. As we hypothesized, older adults did not reliably prefer to re-engage with people who had proven themselves to be generous. This bias was driven by a combination of worse associative memory for how much each person shared, linked to decreased medial temporal lobe activity during encoding, and decreased inhibition of irrelevant facial features, linked to reduced activity in the inferior frontal gyrus. Taken together, our findings highlight 'age-related differences' in the ability to both encode relevant information and adaptively deploy it in service of social decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults are frequent victims of scams, possibly due to biases in how they decide whom to trust. Indeed, older adults' decisions are more likely to be influenced by how generous a person looks and less so by their memory for how this person behaved. Here, we leverage functional magnetic resonance imaging data to clarify the mechanism by which this age-dependent difference emerges. Eighty-six participants learned how much of a $10 endowment an individual shared in a dictator game, and then made decisions about whom to play another round with. As we hypothesized, older adults did not reliably prefer to re-engage with people who had proven themselves to be generous. This bias was driven by a combination of worse associative memory for how much each person shared, linked to decreased medial temporal lobe activity during encoding, and decreased inhibition of irrelevant facial features, linked to reduced activity in the inferior frontal gyrus. Taken together, our findings highlight 'age-related differences' in the ability to both encode relevant information and adaptively deploy it in service of social decisions.

信任决策中的年龄相关差异:当记忆失效和外表占上风时。
老年人经常是骗局的受害者,这可能是由于他们在决定信任谁方面存在偏见。事实上,老年人的决定更有可能受到一个人看起来有多慷慨的影响,而不太可能受到他们对这个人的行为的记忆的影响(Lempert et al., 2022)。在这里,我们利用功能磁共振成像数据来阐明这种年龄依赖性差异出现的机制。86名参与者了解了在独裁者游戏中每个人能分享多少10美元的捐赠,然后决定下一轮和谁一起玩。正如我们假设的那样,老年人并不一定喜欢与那些已经证明自己慷慨的人重新交往。这种偏见是由两种因素共同造成的,一种是对每个人分享多少信息的联想记忆变差,与编码过程中内侧颞叶活动减少有关,另一种是对不相关面部特征的抑制减弱,与额下回活动减少有关。综上所述,我们的研究结果强调了在编码相关信息的能力和在社会决策中适应性地运用这些信息的能力方面与年龄相关的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信