[How age-friendly are cities and communities? German version of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire (AFCCQ)].

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Adele Grenz, Michael Weinhardt, Moritz Hess, Joost van Hoof, Jeroen Dikken, Kathrin Boerner
{"title":"[How age-friendly are cities and communities? German version of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire (AFCCQ)].","authors":"Adele Grenz, Michael Weinhardt, Moritz Hess, Joost van Hoof, Jeroen Dikken, Kathrin Boerner","doi":"10.1007/s00391-025-02440-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Urbanisation and demographic change present social challenges that are often insufficiently addressed in urban and care planning. This study introduces a German-language version of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire (AFCCQ) as a tool for measuring age-friendliness. The aim is to assess age-friendliness from the perspective of older adults and to identify varying needs within cities. In addition, findings for the city of Oldenburg are presented.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The validation study was conducted with a representative sample of older people in Oldenburg (n = 905). The participants completed the AFCCQ-DE questionnaire, consisting of 23 items, and rated their experiences in the city using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree - strongly agree). A factor analysis and a cluster analysis were then carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The psychometric validity and reliability of the AFCCQ-DE were confirmed. The questionnaire, which was translated into German for the first time, proved to be a robust instrument that can now be used in German-speaking countries. Using cluster-analytical methods, four groups of older people were identified, differing systematically in terms of their personal characteristics and needs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results highlight the importance of a standardised instrument such as the AFCCQ for planning and evaluating the age-friendliness of cities and municipalities. The collected data provide a basis for the development of targeted urban planning measures that specifically address the needs of older adults and support ageing well in urban environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-025-02440-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Urbanisation and demographic change present social challenges that are often insufficiently addressed in urban and care planning. This study introduces a German-language version of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire (AFCCQ) as a tool for measuring age-friendliness. The aim is to assess age-friendliness from the perspective of older adults and to identify varying needs within cities. In addition, findings for the city of Oldenburg are presented.

Method: The validation study was conducted with a representative sample of older people in Oldenburg (n = 905). The participants completed the AFCCQ-DE questionnaire, consisting of 23 items, and rated their experiences in the city using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree - strongly agree). A factor analysis and a cluster analysis were then carried out.

Results: The psychometric validity and reliability of the AFCCQ-DE were confirmed. The questionnaire, which was translated into German for the first time, proved to be a robust instrument that can now be used in German-speaking countries. Using cluster-analytical methods, four groups of older people were identified, differing systematically in terms of their personal characteristics and needs.

Discussion: The results highlight the importance of a standardised instrument such as the AFCCQ for planning and evaluating the age-friendliness of cities and municipalities. The collected data provide a basis for the development of targeted urban planning measures that specifically address the needs of older adults and support ageing well in urban environments.

[城市和社区对老年人有多友好?]德文版本的“长者友善城市及社区问卷”[。]
背景和目的:城市化和人口变化带来的社会挑战往往在城市和护理规划中得不到充分解决。本研究采用德文版本的“高龄友善城市与社区问卷”(AFCCQ)作为衡量高龄友善程度的工具。其目的是从老年人的角度评估老年人友好性,并确定城市内的不同需求。此外,还介绍了奥尔登堡市的调查结果。方法:采用奥尔登堡老年人代表性样本( = 905)进行验证研究。参与者完成了由23个项目组成的AFCCQ-DE问卷,并使用5分李克特量表(强烈不同意-强烈同意)对他们在这座城市的经历进行了评分。然后进行因子分析和聚类分析。结果:AFCCQ-DE的心理测量效度和信度得到证实。调查问卷第一次被翻译成德语,证明是一个强有力的工具,现在可以在德语国家使用。采用聚类分析方法,确定了四组老年人,他们在个人特征和需求方面有系统的不同。讨论:结果突出了AFCCQ等标准化工具在规划和评估城市和直辖市的老年人友好性方面的重要性。收集到的数据为制定有针对性的城市规划措施提供了基础,这些措施专门针对老年人的需要,并在城市环境中为老年人提供良好的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信