The accuracy of C-ARM in evaluating pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis during surgery compared with EOS radiography after lumbar fixation.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hasan Toghraei Semiromi, Mohammadreza Chehrassan, Mansour Bahardoust, Hasan Ghandhari, Abbas Esmaeli, Farshad Nikouei
{"title":"The accuracy of C-ARM in evaluating pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis during surgery compared with EOS radiography after lumbar fixation.","authors":"Hasan Toghraei Semiromi, Mohammadreza Chehrassan, Mansour Bahardoust, Hasan Ghandhari, Abbas Esmaeli, Farshad Nikouei","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02921-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving the global spinal alignment, especially the pelvis, in spine surgeries is considered the most important factor in the success of these surgeries, which requires an accurate evaluation of the correction angles measured during surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the mobile C-arm X-ray machine (C-ARM) for measuring lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic incidence (PI) parameters during lumbar fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 59 lumbar fixation candidates who underwent surgery between 2020 and 2022 at our medical center, were examined. PI and LL parameters were measured at the fusion site with fluoroscopy, during surgery with C-ARM, and after surgery with EOS locally.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 54.69 ± 17.62 years. 42 (71.2%) were female. The mean PI based on intraoperative C-ARM and post-surgery EOS findings were 54.57 ± 11.19 and 54.83 ± 11.17, respectively, which this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.9). The mean LL estimate based on C-ARM and EOS findings was similar (P: 0.44).A significant positive linear correlation was observed for the mean PI (r: 0.97, p: 0.001) and LL (r: 0.99, p: 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mean PI and LL angle during operation (measured with C-ARM) was similar to the mean of these parameters in EOS imaging findings after surgery. C-ARM can be used as a convenient device in the operating room with high precision to measure PI and LL values in spine surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02921-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achieving the global spinal alignment, especially the pelvis, in spine surgeries is considered the most important factor in the success of these surgeries, which requires an accurate evaluation of the correction angles measured during surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the mobile C-arm X-ray machine (C-ARM) for measuring lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic incidence (PI) parameters during lumbar fixation.

Methods: In this prospective study, 59 lumbar fixation candidates who underwent surgery between 2020 and 2022 at our medical center, were examined. PI and LL parameters were measured at the fusion site with fluoroscopy, during surgery with C-ARM, and after surgery with EOS locally.

Results: The mean age was 54.69 ± 17.62 years. 42 (71.2%) were female. The mean PI based on intraoperative C-ARM and post-surgery EOS findings were 54.57 ± 11.19 and 54.83 ± 11.17, respectively, which this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.9). The mean LL estimate based on C-ARM and EOS findings was similar (P: 0.44).A significant positive linear correlation was observed for the mean PI (r: 0.97, p: 0.001) and LL (r: 0.99, p: 0.001).

Conclusion: The mean PI and LL angle during operation (measured with C-ARM) was similar to the mean of these parameters in EOS imaging findings after surgery. C-ARM can be used as a convenient device in the operating room with high precision to measure PI and LL values in spine surgeries.

C-ARM在评估手术中骨盆发生率和腰椎前凸的准确性与腰椎固定后EOS x线片的比较。
背景:在脊柱手术中,实现脊柱的整体对齐,尤其是骨盆,被认为是这些手术成功的最重要因素,这需要对手术中测量的矫正角度进行准确的评估。本研究旨在评估移动c臂x线机(C-arm)在腰椎固定期间测量腰椎前凸(LL)和骨盆发生率(PI)参数的准确性。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,我们对2020年至2022年间在我们医疗中心接受手术的59例腰椎固定术患者进行了检查。在融合部位、术中使用C-ARM和术后使用局部EOS分别用透视法测量PI和LL参数。结果:患者平均年龄54.69±17.62岁。女性42例(71.2%)。术中C-ARM和术后EOS的PI均值分别为54.57±11.19和54.83±11.17,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.9)。基于C-ARM和EOS结果的平均LL估计相似(P: 0.44)。平均PI (r: 0.97, p: 0.001)和LL (r: 0.99, p: 0.001)呈显著的正线性相关。结论:术中PI和LL角的平均值(C-ARM测量)与术后EOS影像中这些参数的平均值相似。C-ARM在脊柱手术中可作为一种方便、高精度的仪器在手术室中测量PI和LL值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信