Optimal timing for cholecystectomy: unveiling insights from a decade-long study on acute cholecystitis and symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Azhy Muhammed Dewana, Amanj Jalal Namq, Baderkhan Saeed Ahmed, Ahmed Abdulkadir Baban
{"title":"Optimal timing for cholecystectomy: unveiling insights from a decade-long study on acute cholecystitis and symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.","authors":"Azhy Muhammed Dewana, Amanj Jalal Namq, Baderkhan Saeed Ahmed, Ahmed Abdulkadir Baban","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02851-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute calculus cholecystitis affects 10 to 20% of untreated individuals. Thus, the surgical community has argued for decades over whether an earlier or later cholecystectomy is better for this condition.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare surgical results, morbidity, and mortality and determine the best timing for surgical intervention among patients with gallstones.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted in Erbil Teaching Hospital, Erbil, Iraq, from January 2013 to December 2023 on 767 patients with acute cholecystitis or symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Patients underwent various types of cholecystectomy (early, intermediate, late, and elective) based on when surgery was conducted after the onset of symptoms. Then, medical treatments were advised, and they were followed up for six weeks. Finally, patients' physical health, postoperative infection severity and complications were assessed, despite reporting patients' age, gender, operation type, chances of conversions, durations of procedure, and hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients were females (72.1%), experienced laparoscopic technique (98.44%), and had ASA II (n = 548, 71.44%). The mean age of patients was 48.40 ± 67.14 years, the mean operation time was 50 ± 30.89 min, and the mean hospitalization time before and after operation was 1.0 ± 0.47 and 2.75 ± 1.63 days, respectively. Most patients from the intermediate group (n = 83) opted for a postponed strategy. Chronic inflammation (grade 0 infection severity) was highest in most patients of the delayed (67.2%) and intermediate groups (53.01%). Most patients had no complications (score 0), and the least had severe complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delayed surgical intervention was harmless and may even be superior to immediate treatment for acute cholecystitis. The morbidity and mortality hazard remains high even in the most severe cases, especially for individuals who received early and intermediate therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02851-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute calculus cholecystitis affects 10 to 20% of untreated individuals. Thus, the surgical community has argued for decades over whether an earlier or later cholecystectomy is better for this condition.

Objectives: To compare surgical results, morbidity, and mortality and determine the best timing for surgical intervention among patients with gallstones.

Patients and methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Erbil Teaching Hospital, Erbil, Iraq, from January 2013 to December 2023 on 767 patients with acute cholecystitis or symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Patients underwent various types of cholecystectomy (early, intermediate, late, and elective) based on when surgery was conducted after the onset of symptoms. Then, medical treatments were advised, and they were followed up for six weeks. Finally, patients' physical health, postoperative infection severity and complications were assessed, despite reporting patients' age, gender, operation type, chances of conversions, durations of procedure, and hospital stay.

Results: Most patients were females (72.1%), experienced laparoscopic technique (98.44%), and had ASA II (n = 548, 71.44%). The mean age of patients was 48.40 ± 67.14 years, the mean operation time was 50 ± 30.89 min, and the mean hospitalization time before and after operation was 1.0 ± 0.47 and 2.75 ± 1.63 days, respectively. Most patients from the intermediate group (n = 83) opted for a postponed strategy. Chronic inflammation (grade 0 infection severity) was highest in most patients of the delayed (67.2%) and intermediate groups (53.01%). Most patients had no complications (score 0), and the least had severe complications.

Conclusion: Delayed surgical intervention was harmless and may even be superior to immediate treatment for acute cholecystitis. The morbidity and mortality hazard remains high even in the most severe cases, especially for individuals who received early and intermediate therapy.

胆囊切除术的最佳时机:从一项长达十年的研究中揭示急性胆囊炎和症状性胆囊结石的见解。
背景:急性结石性胆囊炎影响10%至20%未经治疗的个体。因此,几十年来,外科学界一直在争论胆囊切除术是早做还是晚做更好。目的:比较胆结石患者的手术效果、发病率和死亡率,并确定手术干预的最佳时机。患者和方法:本前瞻性队列研究于2013年1月至2023年12月在伊拉克埃尔比勒埃尔比勒教学医院对767例急性胆囊炎或症状性胆囊结石患者进行。根据症状出现后的手术时间,患者接受了不同类型的胆囊切除术(早期、中期、晚期和选择性)。然后,建议他们进行药物治疗,并对他们进行了六周的随访。最后,评估患者的身体健康、术后感染严重程度和并发症,尽管报告了患者的年龄、性别、手术类型、转诊机会、手术持续时间和住院时间。结果:大多数患者为女性(72.1%),有腹腔镜技术经验(98.44%),ASA II级(548例,71.44%)。患者平均年龄48.40±67.14岁,平均手术时间50±30.89 min,手术前后平均住院时间分别为1.0±0.47天和2.75±1.63 d。中间组(n = 83)的大多数患者选择了延迟治疗策略。慢性炎症(感染严重程度为0级)在延迟组(67.2%)和中间组(53.01%)中最高。大多数患者无并发症(评分0分),严重并发症最少。结论:延迟手术治疗对急性胆囊炎是无害的,甚至可能优于立即治疗。即使在最严重的病例中,特别是对于接受早期和中期治疗的个体,发病率和死亡率风险仍然很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信