Alterations of ocular surface microbiome in glaucoma and its association with dry eye.

IF 2
Houyem Kamdougha, Bernard Taminiau, Papa Abdoulaye Fall, Saloua Ben Amor, Amira Trigui, Georges Daube, Basma Mnif
{"title":"Alterations of ocular surface microbiome in glaucoma and its association with dry eye.","authors":"Houyem Kamdougha, Bernard Taminiau, Papa Abdoulaye Fall, Saloua Ben Amor, Amira Trigui, Georges Daube, Basma Mnif","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.002013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Alterations in ocular surface microbiota (OSM) have been noted in both dry eye disease (DED) and glaucoma. However, the combined effects of these conditions on OSM have not been explored.<b>Hypothesis.</b> We hypothesized that patients with both glaucoma and dry eye would exhibit distinct changes in OSM composition and diversity compared to those with only glaucoma, only dry eye or healthy individuals.<b>Aim.</b> We employed amplicon sequencing to investigate OSM profiles in patients with glaucoma and/or dry eye disease.<b>Methods.</b> Swab samples from the conjunctiva of both eyes were collected from 28 glaucomatous patients [13 without dry eye syndrome (G-only) and 15 with dry eye syndrome (G-DED)], 13 DED patients without glaucoma (DED-only) and 31 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). After V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing, MOTHUR tools and R language were used to elucidate and compare OSM composition and diversity between groups.<b>Results.</b> Our data revealed very diverse bacterial communities with 28 phyla and 785 genera. All the groups shared the three most abundant phyla, <i>Actinobacteria</i> (67.47%), <i>Firmicutes</i> (17.14%) and <i>Proteobacteria</i> (13.73%). <i>Corynebacterium</i> (54.75%), <i>Staphylococcus</i> (10.71%), <i>Cutibacterium</i> (8.77%) and <i>Streptococcus</i> (3.20%) were the most abundant genera. Only the G-DED group showed higher alpha diversity than the HC group (<i>P</i><0.05). However, significant differences in beta diversity were observed between all three patient groups and the HC group. The Differential Expression for Sequencing 2 (DESeq2) analysis unveiled an increased presence of opportunistic bacteria across all pathological groups, with the G-DED group demonstrating the most pronounced alterations.<b>Conclusions.</b> Our findings confirm the predominance of Gram-positive bacteria in normal OSM and the rise of opportunistic Gram-negative bacteria in glaucoma and dry eye disease. This is the first study to characterize OSM in glaucoma patients with DED.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Alterations in ocular surface microbiota (OSM) have been noted in both dry eye disease (DED) and glaucoma. However, the combined effects of these conditions on OSM have not been explored.Hypothesis. We hypothesized that patients with both glaucoma and dry eye would exhibit distinct changes in OSM composition and diversity compared to those with only glaucoma, only dry eye or healthy individuals.Aim. We employed amplicon sequencing to investigate OSM profiles in patients with glaucoma and/or dry eye disease.Methods. Swab samples from the conjunctiva of both eyes were collected from 28 glaucomatous patients [13 without dry eye syndrome (G-only) and 15 with dry eye syndrome (G-DED)], 13 DED patients without glaucoma (DED-only) and 31 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). After V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing, MOTHUR tools and R language were used to elucidate and compare OSM composition and diversity between groups.Results. Our data revealed very diverse bacterial communities with 28 phyla and 785 genera. All the groups shared the three most abundant phyla, Actinobacteria (67.47%), Firmicutes (17.14%) and Proteobacteria (13.73%). Corynebacterium (54.75%), Staphylococcus (10.71%), Cutibacterium (8.77%) and Streptococcus (3.20%) were the most abundant genera. Only the G-DED group showed higher alpha diversity than the HC group (P<0.05). However, significant differences in beta diversity were observed between all three patient groups and the HC group. The Differential Expression for Sequencing 2 (DESeq2) analysis unveiled an increased presence of opportunistic bacteria across all pathological groups, with the G-DED group demonstrating the most pronounced alterations.Conclusions. Our findings confirm the predominance of Gram-positive bacteria in normal OSM and the rise of opportunistic Gram-negative bacteria in glaucoma and dry eye disease. This is the first study to characterize OSM in glaucoma patients with DED.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

青光眼眼表微生物群的改变及其与干眼的关系。
介绍。在干眼病(DED)和青光眼中都注意到眼表微生物群(OSM)的改变。然而,这些条件对OSM的综合影响尚未被探索。我们假设青光眼和干眼合并的患者与仅青光眼、仅干眼或健康人相比,OSM的组成和多样性会发生明显的变化。我们采用扩增子测序来研究青光眼和/或干眼病患者的OSM谱。从28例青光眼患者(13例无干眼综合征(G-only), 15例干眼综合征(G-DED))、13例无干眼综合征(d -only)的DED患者和31例年龄匹配的健康对照(hc)中采集双眼结膜拭子样本。在完成V3-V4 16S rRNA测序后,利用MOTHUR工具和R语言对各组间OSM的组成和多样性进行了分析和比较。我们的数据显示,细菌群落非常多样化,有28门和785属。所有类群的丰度最高的三个门分别是放线菌门(67.47%)、厚壁菌门(17.14%)和变形菌门(13.73%)。杆状杆菌(54.75%)、葡萄球菌(10.71%)、表皮杆菌(8.77%)和链球菌(3.20%)是最丰富的属。只有G-DED组α多样性高于HC组(p结论。我们的研究结果证实了革兰氏阳性菌在正常OSM中占主导地位,而机会性革兰氏阴性菌在青光眼和干眼病中上升。这是首次研究DED青光眼患者的OSM特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信