Vera Lucia Lângaro Amaral, Gabriela Reif, Rafael Alonso Salvador, Cleiton Alves de Oliveira, Alfred Paul Senn, Tiago Góss Dos Santos
{"title":"Development and validation of a sperm-freezing device created using 3D printer technology.","authors":"Vera Lucia Lângaro Amaral, Gabriela Reif, Rafael Alonso Salvador, Cleiton Alves de Oliveira, Alfred Paul Senn, Tiago Góss Dos Santos","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a 3D-printed prototype to hold semen straws during the freezing process under safe and reproducible conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prototype capable of holding ten straws in liquid nitrogen vapor (LN2) was 3D printed. A second support that is commonly used was assembled from pieces of expanded polyethylene (EPS), respecting the identical distance between the straws and the LN2 surface. Temperatures were registered with a thermocouple placed inside a straw. Semen samples were frozen in the presence of cryoprotectant using the prototype (n=20) and the EPS support (n=20) in two independent series of measurements. Sperm parameters (motility, vitality, and DNA fragmentation) were measured for fresh and frozen-thawed samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The temperature cooling curves measured on the prototype were remarkably reproducible. The prototype material withstood over 300 freezing cycles without damage. The mean motility and vitality of fresh (64.2%, 72.0%) and frozen-thawed (25.7%, 38.8%) samples were significantly different (p<0.001) using either support. Recovery rates of motility, vitality, and sperm DNA fragmentation in frozen-thawed sperm samples were equal regardless of straw position on the prototype or support type used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed device allows a homogeneous, quantifiable, reproducible cooling of the straws in liquid nitrogen vapor. The recovery rates are comparable to those reported in the literature for both tested supports. The designed 3-D printed prototype favors the safe handling of the straws, an explicit way of describing freezing conditions, and a better intra-operator and inter-laboratory reproducibility of the cryopreservation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"272-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a 3D-printed prototype to hold semen straws during the freezing process under safe and reproducible conditions.
Methods: A prototype capable of holding ten straws in liquid nitrogen vapor (LN2) was 3D printed. A second support that is commonly used was assembled from pieces of expanded polyethylene (EPS), respecting the identical distance between the straws and the LN2 surface. Temperatures were registered with a thermocouple placed inside a straw. Semen samples were frozen in the presence of cryoprotectant using the prototype (n=20) and the EPS support (n=20) in two independent series of measurements. Sperm parameters (motility, vitality, and DNA fragmentation) were measured for fresh and frozen-thawed samples.
Results: The temperature cooling curves measured on the prototype were remarkably reproducible. The prototype material withstood over 300 freezing cycles without damage. The mean motility and vitality of fresh (64.2%, 72.0%) and frozen-thawed (25.7%, 38.8%) samples were significantly different (p<0.001) using either support. Recovery rates of motility, vitality, and sperm DNA fragmentation in frozen-thawed sperm samples were equal regardless of straw position on the prototype or support type used.
Conclusions: The developed device allows a homogeneous, quantifiable, reproducible cooling of the straws in liquid nitrogen vapor. The recovery rates are comparable to those reported in the literature for both tested supports. The designed 3-D printed prototype favors the safe handling of the straws, an explicit way of describing freezing conditions, and a better intra-operator and inter-laboratory reproducibility of the cryopreservation process.