Comparison of Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Short-term Outcomes in Patients With Obesity.

Sang Hyun Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Short-term Outcomes in Patients With Obesity.","authors":"Sang Hyun Kim","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2025.14.1.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare postoperative course of laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during a 1-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Electronic medical records of all patients who underwent SADJB-SG and RYGB between March 2019 and June 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities, episode of dumping syndrome, and marginal ulcer at endoscopy were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four patients who underwent SADJB-SG and RYGB were enrolled. One-year follow-up rate was 78.6%. There were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of postoperative stay, postoperative complications, readmission, or reoperation rate between SADJB-SG and RYGB. Percent of total weight loss (%TWL) was 26.9±9.3% in SADJB-SG and 29.6±7.6% in RYGB (P=0.209). Remission rates of T2DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and GERD were 78.3%, 63.6%, 44.4%, and 40% in SADJB-SG and 71.4%, 52.9%, 56.2%, and 12.5% in RYGB (P=0.318, P=0.480, P=0.417, and P=0.561), respectively. Episodes of dumping syndrome and marginal ulcer at endoscopy showed rates of 0% and 0% in SADJB-SG and 33.4% and 15.8% in RYGB (P=0.002 and P=0.043), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SADJB-SG is comparable to RYGB in terms of perioperative outcomes, weight loss, and resolution of co-morbidities. It is advantageous in terms of dumping syndrome and marginal ulcer during 1-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2025.14.1.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative course of laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during a 1-year follow-up period.

Materials and methods: Electronic medical records of all patients who underwent SADJB-SG and RYGB between March 2019 and June 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities, episode of dumping syndrome, and marginal ulcer at endoscopy were assessed.

Results: Eighty-four patients who underwent SADJB-SG and RYGB were enrolled. One-year follow-up rate was 78.6%. There were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of postoperative stay, postoperative complications, readmission, or reoperation rate between SADJB-SG and RYGB. Percent of total weight loss (%TWL) was 26.9±9.3% in SADJB-SG and 29.6±7.6% in RYGB (P=0.209). Remission rates of T2DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and GERD were 78.3%, 63.6%, 44.4%, and 40% in SADJB-SG and 71.4%, 52.9%, 56.2%, and 12.5% in RYGB (P=0.318, P=0.480, P=0.417, and P=0.561), respectively. Episodes of dumping syndrome and marginal ulcer at endoscopy showed rates of 0% and 0% in SADJB-SG and 33.4% and 15.8% in RYGB (P=0.002 and P=0.043), respectively.

Conclusion: SADJB-SG is comparable to RYGB in terms of perioperative outcomes, weight loss, and resolution of co-morbidities. It is advantageous in terms of dumping syndrome and marginal ulcer during 1-year follow-up.

腹腔镜单吻合术十二指肠空肠旁路术与套筒胃切除术和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对肥胖症患者近期疗效的比较。
目的:本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜单吻合术十二指肠空肠旁路术与套筒胃切除术(SADJB-SG)和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)在1年随访期间的术后过程。材料和方法:回顾性分析2019年3月至2021年6月在同一机构接受SADJB-SG和RYGB治疗的所有患者的电子病历。评估手术结果、体重减轻、合并症的缓解、倾倒综合征的发作和内镜检查时的边缘溃疡。结果:84例患者接受了SADJB-SG和RYGB。1年随访率为78.6%。SADJB-SG和RYGB在手术时间、估计失血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症、再入院或再手术率方面无显著差异。SADJB-SG组总减重百分比(%TWL)为26.9±9.3%,RYGB组为29.6±7.6% (P=0.209)。T2DM、高血压、血脂异常和GERD的缓解率SADJB-SG组分别为78.3%、63.6%、44.4%和40%,RYGB组分别为71.4%、52.9%、56.2%和12.5% (P=0.318、P=0.480、P=0.417和P=0.561)。内镜下倾倒综合征和边缘溃疡发生率SADJB-SG组分别为0%和0%,RYGB组分别为33.4%和15.8% (P=0.002和0.043)。结论:SADJB-SG在围手术期结局、体重减轻和合并症的解决方面与RYGB相当。在1年的随访中,在倾倒综合征和边缘溃疡方面是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信