Comparison of Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Short-term Outcomes in Patients With Obesity.
{"title":"Comparison of Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Short-term Outcomes in Patients With Obesity.","authors":"Sang Hyun Kim","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2025.14.1.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare postoperative course of laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during a 1-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Electronic medical records of all patients who underwent SADJB-SG and RYGB between March 2019 and June 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities, episode of dumping syndrome, and marginal ulcer at endoscopy were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four patients who underwent SADJB-SG and RYGB were enrolled. One-year follow-up rate was 78.6%. There were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of postoperative stay, postoperative complications, readmission, or reoperation rate between SADJB-SG and RYGB. Percent of total weight loss (%TWL) was 26.9±9.3% in SADJB-SG and 29.6±7.6% in RYGB (P=0.209). Remission rates of T2DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and GERD were 78.3%, 63.6%, 44.4%, and 40% in SADJB-SG and 71.4%, 52.9%, 56.2%, and 12.5% in RYGB (P=0.318, P=0.480, P=0.417, and P=0.561), respectively. Episodes of dumping syndrome and marginal ulcer at endoscopy showed rates of 0% and 0% in SADJB-SG and 33.4% and 15.8% in RYGB (P=0.002 and P=0.043), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SADJB-SG is comparable to RYGB in terms of perioperative outcomes, weight loss, and resolution of co-morbidities. It is advantageous in terms of dumping syndrome and marginal ulcer during 1-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2025.14.1.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative course of laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during a 1-year follow-up period.
Materials and methods: Electronic medical records of all patients who underwent SADJB-SG and RYGB between March 2019 and June 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities, episode of dumping syndrome, and marginal ulcer at endoscopy were assessed.
Results: Eighty-four patients who underwent SADJB-SG and RYGB were enrolled. One-year follow-up rate was 78.6%. There were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of postoperative stay, postoperative complications, readmission, or reoperation rate between SADJB-SG and RYGB. Percent of total weight loss (%TWL) was 26.9±9.3% in SADJB-SG and 29.6±7.6% in RYGB (P=0.209). Remission rates of T2DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and GERD were 78.3%, 63.6%, 44.4%, and 40% in SADJB-SG and 71.4%, 52.9%, 56.2%, and 12.5% in RYGB (P=0.318, P=0.480, P=0.417, and P=0.561), respectively. Episodes of dumping syndrome and marginal ulcer at endoscopy showed rates of 0% and 0% in SADJB-SG and 33.4% and 15.8% in RYGB (P=0.002 and P=0.043), respectively.
Conclusion: SADJB-SG is comparable to RYGB in terms of perioperative outcomes, weight loss, and resolution of co-morbidities. It is advantageous in terms of dumping syndrome and marginal ulcer during 1-year follow-up.