Ethical Use of Wearable Device Data in Occupational Settings: Perspectives From the Fire Service.

IF 1.4
Rachel J Topazian, Aleksandra Wec, Joseph Ali, Shannon Frattaroli, Paul Locke, Jennifer A Taylor, Cassandra K Crifasi
{"title":"Ethical Use of Wearable Device Data in Occupational Settings: Perspectives From the Fire Service.","authors":"Rachel J Topazian, Aleksandra Wec, Joseph Ali, Shannon Frattaroli, Paul Locke, Jennifer A Taylor, Cassandra K Crifasi","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite interest in using wearable technology to improve firefighter health and safety, there is little evidence on data privacy preferences in the fire service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews and focus groups with career firefighters and fire department and union leaders in Maryland and Virginia and with national-level leaders (March to November 2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 4 focus groups and 35 interviews (65 participants). Leaders were optimistic about using wearable data to help firefighters obtain benefits, improve safety, conduct prevention, and advance administrative priorities. Firefighters described tradeoffs between safety and autonomy, privacy, and job status. Firefighters opposed using wearables on calls, whereas leadership was supportive. Participants identified implementation barriers and conditions for ethical implementation of wearables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wearable data could protect health and safety but must be utilized in a way that respects autonomy and privacy preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e621-e629"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite interest in using wearable technology to improve firefighter health and safety, there is little evidence on data privacy preferences in the fire service.

Methods: We conducted interviews and focus groups with career firefighters and fire department and union leaders in Maryland and Virginia and with national-level leaders (March to November 2023).

Results: We conducted 4 focus groups and 35 interviews (65 participants). Leaders were optimistic about using wearable data to help firefighters obtain benefits, improve safety, conduct prevention, and advance administrative priorities. Firefighters described tradeoffs between safety and autonomy, privacy, and job status. Firefighters opposed using wearables on calls, whereas leadership was supportive. Participants identified implementation barriers and conditions for ethical implementation of wearables.

Conclusions: Wearable data could protect health and safety but must be utilized in a way that respects autonomy and privacy preferences.

职业环境中可穿戴设备数据的道德使用:来自消防部门的观点。
目的:尽管人们对使用可穿戴技术来改善消防员的健康和安全感兴趣,但很少有证据表明消防服务中的数据隐私偏好。方法:我们对马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州的职业消防员、消防部门和工会领导人以及国家级领导人进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论(2023年3月至11月)。结果:共进行了4个焦点小组和35个访谈(65名参与者)。领导人对使用可穿戴数据来帮助消防员获得利益、提高安全性、进行预防和推进行政优先事项持乐观态度。消防员描述了安全与自主、隐私和工作状态之间的权衡。消防员反对使用可穿戴设备,而领导层则表示支持。与会者确定了可穿戴设备道德实施的实施障碍和条件。结论:可穿戴数据可以保护健康和安全,但必须以尊重自主权和隐私偏好的方式使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信