Early Results of a Single-Center Prospective Clinical Trial: In Situ Fenestration System for Aortic Dissection.

Yingxin Tan, Weijian Chen, Zhengfei Li, Helong Xu, Yufeng Zhao, Dan Zhou, Yubo Bai, Xiaojie Wang, Tao Xu, Yulin Zhang, Jun Xu, Xiaojun Shu
{"title":"Early Results of a Single-Center Prospective Clinical Trial: In Situ Fenestration System for Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Yingxin Tan, Weijian Chen, Zhengfei Li, Helong Xu, Yufeng Zhao, Dan Zhou, Yubo Bai, Xiaojie Wang, Tao Xu, Yulin Zhang, Jun Xu, Xiaojun Shu","doi":"10.1177/15385744251330013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectivestudy aims to assess the clinical efficacy, technical features, and early follow-up outcomes of aortic arch dissection (AD) requiring left subclavian artery (LSA) reconstruction using the aorta arch stent-graft system combined with the endovascular needle system for in situ fenestration.Methods and ResultsEight patients with AD were enrolled in this clinical trial after rigorous screening between July 2021 and August 2022. The 8 patients who participated in this trial were male, with a mean age of 62.0 ± 8.3 years. The total operative time was 148.38 ± 35.06 minutes, and the mean hospitalization time was 11.4 ± 4.4 days. A total of 12 aortic stents were implanted in the 8 patients, and branching stents were implanted in the LSA in all patients. No cases of delayed endoleak occurred. There were no stent- or aorta-related deaths. The 2 deaths that did occur were confirmed to have been due to causes outside of the aorta and were unrelated to the thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedure, with a 1-year stent patency rate of 100%.ConclusionsWe believe that this trial of in situ fenestration achieved satisfactory early results, with reasonable postprocedural stent patency and patient survival, and there were no endoleaks requiring intervention during follow-up. However, long-term follow-up is needed to validate the findings of this trial.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov PRS Protocol Registration and Results System (URL: Home - ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05126446).</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251330013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251330013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectivestudy aims to assess the clinical efficacy, technical features, and early follow-up outcomes of aortic arch dissection (AD) requiring left subclavian artery (LSA) reconstruction using the aorta arch stent-graft system combined with the endovascular needle system for in situ fenestration.Methods and ResultsEight patients with AD were enrolled in this clinical trial after rigorous screening between July 2021 and August 2022. The 8 patients who participated in this trial were male, with a mean age of 62.0 ± 8.3 years. The total operative time was 148.38 ± 35.06 minutes, and the mean hospitalization time was 11.4 ± 4.4 days. A total of 12 aortic stents were implanted in the 8 patients, and branching stents were implanted in the LSA in all patients. No cases of delayed endoleak occurred. There were no stent- or aorta-related deaths. The 2 deaths that did occur were confirmed to have been due to causes outside of the aorta and were unrelated to the thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedure, with a 1-year stent patency rate of 100%.ConclusionsWe believe that this trial of in situ fenestration achieved satisfactory early results, with reasonable postprocedural stent patency and patient survival, and there were no endoleaks requiring intervention during follow-up. However, long-term follow-up is needed to validate the findings of this trial.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov PRS Protocol Registration and Results System (URL: Home - ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05126446).

一项单中心前瞻性临床试验的早期结果:主动脉夹层原位开窗系统。
目的评价主动脉弓夹层(AD)需要左锁骨下动脉(LSA)重建的主动脉弓支架系统联合血管内针系统原位开窗的临床疗效、技术特点和早期随访结果。方法和结果在2021年7月至2022年8月期间,8例AD患者经过严格筛选入组该临床试验。8例患者均为男性,平均年龄62.0±8.3岁。总手术时间148.38±35.06 min,平均住院时间11.4±4.4 d。8例患者共植入了12个主动脉支架,所有患者均在LSA中植入了分支支架。无迟发性内漏病例发生。没有支架或主动脉相关的死亡。确实发生的2例死亡被证实是由于主动脉外的原因,与胸腔血管内主动脉修复手术无关,1年支架通畅率为100%。结论我们认为该原位开窗试验取得了令人满意的早期效果,术后支架通畅程度和患者生存率合理,随访期间未出现需要干预的内漏。然而,需要长期随访来验证该试验的结果。PRS方案注册和结果系统(URL: Home - ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05126446)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信