Robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting with R-OneTM: Feasibility and safety assessment in patients with carotid web lesions.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Quentin Alias, Jean-Christophe Ferré, Julien Boucherit, Jean-Yves Gauvrit, François Eugène
{"title":"Robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting with R-One<sup>TM</sup>: Feasibility and safety assessment in patients with carotid web lesions.","authors":"Quentin Alias, Jean-Christophe Ferré, Julien Boucherit, Jean-Yves Gauvrit, François Eugène","doi":"10.1177/15910199251332408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeRobotic-assisted carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures are on the rise and have demonstrated benefits compared to manual intervention. The R-OneTM robotic platform has demonstrated safety and efficacy for percutaneous coronary interventions, but its utility for procedures in the common carotid artery has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to assess the feasibility and initial safety of the R-OneTM robotic platform for treating patients with carotid artery disease (CAD) presenting with carotid web-diaphragm lesions.MethodsThe prospective CArotid Robotic procedure Evaluation study included patients with CAD suitable for CAS. The primary endpoint was procedure technical success, defined as the absence of any unplanned manual assistance or conversion to manual CAS for procedural completion. Secondary endpoints included the absence of intra-procedural complications, primary operator radiation exposure, patient radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast volume.ResultsA total of seven patients were enrolled (mean age: 49.57 ± 13.10 years; 5 females). Procedure technical success rate was 85.7% (6/7). The absence of intra-procedural complications rate was 100%. Mean overall procedure time was 41.71 ± 9.83 min, mean robotic procedure time was 15.86 ± 7.60 min, and mean CAS procedure time was 27.14 ± 8.71 min. The average patient radiation exposure dose was 135.50 ± 78.88 mGy. The mean overall procedure contrast volume was 68.14 ± 20.14 mL, and the mean robotic procedure contrast volume was 1.43 ± 3.78 mL.ConclusionCAS procedures using R-OneTM are feasible and safe with a good technical success rate without complications. To confirm these findings, larger multi-center trials with a diverse range of patients are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251332408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251332408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeRobotic-assisted carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures are on the rise and have demonstrated benefits compared to manual intervention. The R-OneTM robotic platform has demonstrated safety and efficacy for percutaneous coronary interventions, but its utility for procedures in the common carotid artery has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to assess the feasibility and initial safety of the R-OneTM robotic platform for treating patients with carotid artery disease (CAD) presenting with carotid web-diaphragm lesions.MethodsThe prospective CArotid Robotic procedure Evaluation study included patients with CAD suitable for CAS. The primary endpoint was procedure technical success, defined as the absence of any unplanned manual assistance or conversion to manual CAS for procedural completion. Secondary endpoints included the absence of intra-procedural complications, primary operator radiation exposure, patient radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast volume.ResultsA total of seven patients were enrolled (mean age: 49.57 ± 13.10 years; 5 females). Procedure technical success rate was 85.7% (6/7). The absence of intra-procedural complications rate was 100%. Mean overall procedure time was 41.71 ± 9.83 min, mean robotic procedure time was 15.86 ± 7.60 min, and mean CAS procedure time was 27.14 ± 8.71 min. The average patient radiation exposure dose was 135.50 ± 78.88 mGy. The mean overall procedure contrast volume was 68.14 ± 20.14 mL, and the mean robotic procedure contrast volume was 1.43 ± 3.78 mL.ConclusionCAS procedures using R-OneTM are feasible and safe with a good technical success rate without complications. To confirm these findings, larger multi-center trials with a diverse range of patients are necessary.

机器人辅助颈动脉支架植入R-OneTM:颈动脉网病变患者的可行性和安全性评估。
目的:与人工干预相比,机器人辅助颈动脉支架(CAS)手术越来越多,并且已经证明其益处。R-OneTM机器人平台已经证明了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性,但其在颈总动脉手术中的应用尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估R-OneTM机器人平台治疗颈动脉疾病(CAD)患者颈动脉膜病变的可行性和初步安全性。方法前瞻性颈动脉机器人手术评估研究纳入适合行颈动脉辅助手术的冠心病患者。主要终点是手术技术成功,定义为没有任何计划外的人工辅助或转换为手动CAS以完成手术。次要终点包括术中并发症、主要操作者辐射暴露、患者辐射暴露、手术时间和造影剂体积。结果共纳入7例患者,平均年龄49.57±13.10岁;5女性)。手术技术成功率85.7%(6/7)。术中并发症发生率为100%。平均总手术时间为41.71±9.83 min,平均机器人手术时间为15.86±7.60 min,平均CAS手术时间为27.14±8.71 min。患者平均辐射暴露剂量为135.50±78.88 mGy。平均整体手术造影剂体积为68.14±20.14 mL,平均机器人手术造影剂体积为1.43±3.78 mL。结论采用R-OneTM进行cas手术可行、安全,技术成功率高,无并发症。为了证实这些发现,有必要对不同范围的患者进行更大规模的多中心试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信