A retrospective analysis of postpartum glucose testing incidence by prenatal care provider specialty in a Canadian gestational diabetes cohort.

Kathleen Baker, Nikki Stephenson, Colleen Cuthbert, Doreen Rabi, Amy Metcalfe
{"title":"A retrospective analysis of postpartum glucose testing incidence by prenatal care provider specialty in a Canadian gestational diabetes cohort.","authors":"Kathleen Baker, Nikki Stephenson, Colleen Cuthbert, Doreen Rabi, Amy Metcalfe","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases future risks of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Despite Diabetes Canada guidelines recommending postpartum glucose testing following GDM, uptake remains low. Canadian population-based studies are needed to examine systems-level factors affecting uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used linked Alberta health datasets including births from 2017-2018 to identify prenatal care provider specialty (general practitioner (GP), obstetrician (OB), or midwife (RM)), postpartum glucose tests, and cohort demographics. Outcomes were 1) gold-standard testing: oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) within 6 weeks to 6 months postpartum and 2) any glucose test within 6 weeks to 1 year. We used adjusted logistic regression modeling to estimate the association between test incidence and provider specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 105,691 births we identified a cohort of 9,884 with GDM. Uptake of postpartum glucose testing was low: 22.2% (95% CI: 21.4 - 23.1) received gold standard testing and 53.9% (95% CI: 52.9 - 54.9) received any glucose test. When compared to the OB group, GP patients were less likely to receive both glucose test outcomes (OR<sub>GS</sub>= 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.95; OR<sub>Any</sub>= 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 - 0.96). Patients of RMs were also less likely to receive both glucose test outcomes (OR<sub>GS</sub>= 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.96; OR<sub>Any</sub>= 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67 - 1.15).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We report low postpartum glucose testing overall and found no clinically meaningful differences across provider specialties. The higher incidence of any glucose testing suggests that providers may be prioritizing alternative tests over the OGTT protocol for GDM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93918,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.03.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases future risks of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Despite Diabetes Canada guidelines recommending postpartum glucose testing following GDM, uptake remains low. Canadian population-based studies are needed to examine systems-level factors affecting uptake.

Methods: We used linked Alberta health datasets including births from 2017-2018 to identify prenatal care provider specialty (general practitioner (GP), obstetrician (OB), or midwife (RM)), postpartum glucose tests, and cohort demographics. Outcomes were 1) gold-standard testing: oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) within 6 weeks to 6 months postpartum and 2) any glucose test within 6 weeks to 1 year. We used adjusted logistic regression modeling to estimate the association between test incidence and provider specialty.

Results: From 105,691 births we identified a cohort of 9,884 with GDM. Uptake of postpartum glucose testing was low: 22.2% (95% CI: 21.4 - 23.1) received gold standard testing and 53.9% (95% CI: 52.9 - 54.9) received any glucose test. When compared to the OB group, GP patients were less likely to receive both glucose test outcomes (ORGS= 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.95; ORAny= 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 - 0.96). Patients of RMs were also less likely to receive both glucose test outcomes (ORGS= 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.96; ORAny= 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67 - 1.15).

Discussion: We report low postpartum glucose testing overall and found no clinically meaningful differences across provider specialties. The higher incidence of any glucose testing suggests that providers may be prioritizing alternative tests over the OGTT protocol for GDM patients.

回顾性分析加拿大妊娠期糖尿病队列中产前保健提供者专业的产后血糖检测发生率。
背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)增加未来2型糖尿病和心血管疾病的风险。尽管加拿大糖尿病指南推荐GDM后进行产后血糖检测,但摄取仍然很低。加拿大需要以人群为基础的研究来检查影响摄取的系统级因素。方法:我们使用关联的艾伯塔省健康数据集,包括2017-2018年的出生,以确定产前护理提供者专业(全科医生(GP)、产科医生(OB)或助产士(RM))、产后血糖测试和队列人口统计数据。结果:1)金标准试验:产后6周至6个月口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT); 2)产后6周至1年内任何葡萄糖试验。我们使用调整后的逻辑回归模型来估计测试发生率与提供者专业之间的关联。结果:从105,691个新生儿中,我们确定了9,884个GDM队列。产后血糖测试的接受率较低:22.2% (95% CI: 21.4 - 23.1)接受金标准测试,53.9% (95% CI: 52.9 - 54.9)接受任何血糖测试。与OB组相比,GP患者接受两项血糖测试结果的可能性较低(ORGS= 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.95;ORAny= 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 - 0.96)。RMs患者接受两种血糖测试结果的可能性也较低(ORGS= 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.96;ORAny= 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67 - 1.15)。讨论:我们报告了总体的产后低血糖测试结果,并没有发现提供者专业之间有临床意义的差异。任何葡萄糖检测的较高发生率表明,对于GDM患者,提供者可能优先考虑替代检测而不是OGTT方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信