Quantitative Computed Tomography Measures of Lung Fibrosis and Outcomes in the National Lung Screening Trial.

IF 5.4
Jennifer M Wang, Swaraj Bose, Susan Murray, Wassim W Labaki, Ella A Kazerooni, Jonathan H Chung, Kevin R Flaherty, MeiLan K Han, Charles R Hatt, Justin M Oldham
{"title":"Quantitative Computed Tomography Measures of Lung Fibrosis and Outcomes in the National Lung Screening Trial.","authors":"Jennifer M Wang, Swaraj Bose, Susan Murray, Wassim W Labaki, Ella A Kazerooni, Jonathan H Chung, Kevin R Flaherty, MeiLan K Han, Charles R Hatt, Justin M Oldham","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1048OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Incidental features of interstitial lung disease (ILD) are commonly observed on chest computed tomography (CT) scans and are independently associated with poor outcomes. Although most studies to date have relied on qualitative assessments of ILD, quantitative imaging algorithms have the potential to effectively detect ILD and assist in risk stratification for population-based cohorts. <b>Objectives:</b> To determine whether quantitative measures of ILD are associated with clinically relevant outcomes in the NLST (National Lung Screening Trial). <b>Methods:</b> Quantitative measures of ILD were generated using low-dose CT (LDCT) data collected as part of the NLST and processed with Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Ratings (CALIPER) and deep learning-based usual interstitial pneumonia (DL-UIP) algorithms (Imbio Inc.). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to test the association between ILD measures (percentage ground-glass opacity, reticular opacity, and honeycombing of total lung volume and binary DL-UIP classification) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes of incident lung cancer and lung cancer mortality were also explored. <b>Results:</b> Quantitative CT data were generated in 11,518 individuals. Mean age was 61.5 years, and 58.7% were male. An increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed for each percentage increase in CALIPER-derived ground-glass opacity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.02), reticular opacity (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24), and honeycombing (HR, 6.23; 95% CI, 4.23-9.16). Individuals with a positive DL-UIP classification pattern had a 4.8-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 4.75; 95% CI, 2.50-9.04). CALIPER-derived reticular opacity was also associated with increased lung cancer-specific mortality. No quantitative measures of ILD were associated with incident lung cancer. <b>Conclusions:</b> Quantitative measures of ILD on LDCT are associated with clinically relevant endpoints in a large at-risk population of individuals with tobacco use history.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1314-1320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1048OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Incidental features of interstitial lung disease (ILD) are commonly observed on chest computed tomography (CT) scans and are independently associated with poor outcomes. Although most studies to date have relied on qualitative assessments of ILD, quantitative imaging algorithms have the potential to effectively detect ILD and assist in risk stratification for population-based cohorts. Objectives: To determine whether quantitative measures of ILD are associated with clinically relevant outcomes in the NLST (National Lung Screening Trial). Methods: Quantitative measures of ILD were generated using low-dose CT (LDCT) data collected as part of the NLST and processed with Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Ratings (CALIPER) and deep learning-based usual interstitial pneumonia (DL-UIP) algorithms (Imbio Inc.). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to test the association between ILD measures (percentage ground-glass opacity, reticular opacity, and honeycombing of total lung volume and binary DL-UIP classification) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes of incident lung cancer and lung cancer mortality were also explored. Results: Quantitative CT data were generated in 11,518 individuals. Mean age was 61.5 years, and 58.7% were male. An increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed for each percentage increase in CALIPER-derived ground-glass opacity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.02), reticular opacity (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24), and honeycombing (HR, 6.23; 95% CI, 4.23-9.16). Individuals with a positive DL-UIP classification pattern had a 4.8-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 4.75; 95% CI, 2.50-9.04). CALIPER-derived reticular opacity was also associated with increased lung cancer-specific mortality. No quantitative measures of ILD were associated with incident lung cancer. Conclusions: Quantitative measures of ILD on LDCT are associated with clinically relevant endpoints in a large at-risk population of individuals with tobacco use history.

国家肺筛查试验中肺纤维化的定量CT测量和结果。
理由:间质性肺疾病(ILD)的附带特征通常在胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)上观察到,并且与不良预后独立相关。虽然迄今为止大多数研究都依赖于ILD的定性评估,但定量成像算法有可能有效地检测ILD并协助基于人群的队列进行风险分层。目的:在国家肺筛查试验(NLST)中确定ILD的定量测量是否与临床相关结果相关。方法:使用作为NLST的一部分收集的低剂量CT (LDCT)数据生成ILD的定量测量,并使用计算机辅助肺病理评估和评分信息学(CALIPER)和基于深度学习的常规间质性肺炎(DL-UIP)算法(Imbio Inc., Minneapolis, MN)进行处理。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型检验ILD指标(毛玻璃浊度百分比、网状浊度百分比、肺总容积蜂状分布百分比和二元DL-UIP分类)与全因死亡率之间的关系。研究还探讨了肺癌发病率和肺癌死亡率的次要结局。结果:获得了11,518例患者的定量CT数据。平均年龄61.5岁,男性58.7%。卡钳衍生的毛玻璃混浊(风险比(HR) 1.02, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.01 - 1.02)、网状混浊(HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12 - 1.24)和蜂巢状混浊(HR 6.23, 95% CI 4.23 - 9.16)每增加1%,全因死亡风险增加。DL-UIP分类模式阳性的个体全因死亡风险增加4.8倍(HR 4.75, 95% CI 2.50 - 9.04)。CALIPER衍生的网状混浊也与肺癌特异性死亡率增加有关。没有定量测量显示ILD与肺癌的发生有关。结论:在大量有吸烟史的高危人群中,LDCT上ILD的定量测量与临床相关终点相关。主要资金来源:本工作由美国国立卫生研究院拨款K24HL138188 (MKH), F32HL175973 (JMW), T32HL007749 (JMW), R01HL169166 (JMO), R01HL166290 (JMO)支持。字数:324/350。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信