Vanessa C Dannenberg, Daniel Ofosu, Ella Milne, Deborah L Olmstead, Mathieu Chalifour, Shannon Scott, Maria L Castro-Codesal
{"title":"Caregivers' outcome prioritization for home positive airway pressure in children: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Vanessa C Dannenberg, Daniel Ofosu, Ella Milne, Deborah L Olmstead, Mathieu Chalifour, Shannon Scott, Maria L Castro-Codesal","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To determine caregiver-reported priorities regarding the benefits, challenges, and further insights on home positive airway pressure (PAP) for children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-method study analyzing responses to an online survey by parents/caregivers of children (<18 years) using home PAP for at least 3 months. A semi-structured anonymous survey with multiple-choice and open-ended questions was conducted asking for caregivers PAP outcome priorities and their opinion on what should be research priorities. Descriptive analysis summarized caregivers' and children's demographics, and responses to multiple-choice questions. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three caregivers completed the survey, 82% were mothers. Over 90% of them considered improved sleep, rest, daytime energy levels, and breathing during sleep as very important/important benefits of PAP. Children becoming dependent on PAP to sleep was reported as very important/important challenge by 76% of caregivers. Among the research priorities, improvement in breathing during sleep (77%) and reduction in the frequency of respiratory illness (73%) were the preferred PAP benefits. Mask-related issues (72%) and the child becoming dependent on PAP (57%) were considered priority challenges to research. Four themes emerged from open-ended questions: 1) better nights and days, 2) adapting to home PAP, 3) finding the right mask, and 4) the importance of a team approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregiver's priorities regarding PAP included known respiratory benefits of this therapy, such as improved breathing, but also less reported non-respiratory outcomes, which reflected in benefits for the entire family. Potential challenges of PAP requiring further research should focus on mask-related issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objectives: To determine caregiver-reported priorities regarding the benefits, challenges, and further insights on home positive airway pressure (PAP) for children.
Methods: Mixed-method study analyzing responses to an online survey by parents/caregivers of children (<18 years) using home PAP for at least 3 months. A semi-structured anonymous survey with multiple-choice and open-ended questions was conducted asking for caregivers PAP outcome priorities and their opinion on what should be research priorities. Descriptive analysis summarized caregivers' and children's demographics, and responses to multiple-choice questions. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the qualitative data.
Results: Seventy-three caregivers completed the survey, 82% were mothers. Over 90% of them considered improved sleep, rest, daytime energy levels, and breathing during sleep as very important/important benefits of PAP. Children becoming dependent on PAP to sleep was reported as very important/important challenge by 76% of caregivers. Among the research priorities, improvement in breathing during sleep (77%) and reduction in the frequency of respiratory illness (73%) were the preferred PAP benefits. Mask-related issues (72%) and the child becoming dependent on PAP (57%) were considered priority challenges to research. Four themes emerged from open-ended questions: 1) better nights and days, 2) adapting to home PAP, 3) finding the right mask, and 4) the importance of a team approach.
Conclusions: Caregiver's priorities regarding PAP included known respiratory benefits of this therapy, such as improved breathing, but also less reported non-respiratory outcomes, which reflected in benefits for the entire family. Potential challenges of PAP requiring further research should focus on mask-related issues.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.