Caregivers' outcome prioritization for home positive airway pressure in children: a mixed-methods study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vanessa C Dannenberg, Daniel Ofosu, Ella Milne, Deborah L Olmstead, Mathieu Chalifour, Shannon Scott, Maria L Castro-Codesal
{"title":"Caregivers' outcome prioritization for home positive airway pressure in children: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Vanessa C Dannenberg, Daniel Ofosu, Ella Milne, Deborah L Olmstead, Mathieu Chalifour, Shannon Scott, Maria L Castro-Codesal","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To determine caregiver-reported priorities regarding the benefits, challenges, and further insights on home positive airway pressure (PAP) for children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-method study analyzing responses to an online survey by parents/caregivers of children (<18 years) using home PAP for at least 3 months. A semi-structured anonymous survey with multiple-choice and open-ended questions was conducted asking for caregivers PAP outcome priorities and their opinion on what should be research priorities. Descriptive analysis summarized caregivers' and children's demographics, and responses to multiple-choice questions. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three caregivers completed the survey, 82% were mothers. Over 90% of them considered improved sleep, rest, daytime energy levels, and breathing during sleep as very important/important benefits of PAP. Children becoming dependent on PAP to sleep was reported as very important/important challenge by 76% of caregivers. Among the research priorities, improvement in breathing during sleep (77%) and reduction in the frequency of respiratory illness (73%) were the preferred PAP benefits. Mask-related issues (72%) and the child becoming dependent on PAP (57%) were considered priority challenges to research. Four themes emerged from open-ended questions: 1) better nights and days, 2) adapting to home PAP, 3) finding the right mask, and 4) the importance of a team approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregiver's priorities regarding PAP included known respiratory benefits of this therapy, such as improved breathing, but also less reported non-respiratory outcomes, which reflected in benefits for the entire family. Potential challenges of PAP requiring further research should focus on mask-related issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: To determine caregiver-reported priorities regarding the benefits, challenges, and further insights on home positive airway pressure (PAP) for children.

Methods: Mixed-method study analyzing responses to an online survey by parents/caregivers of children (<18 years) using home PAP for at least 3 months. A semi-structured anonymous survey with multiple-choice and open-ended questions was conducted asking for caregivers PAP outcome priorities and their opinion on what should be research priorities. Descriptive analysis summarized caregivers' and children's demographics, and responses to multiple-choice questions. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the qualitative data.

Results: Seventy-three caregivers completed the survey, 82% were mothers. Over 90% of them considered improved sleep, rest, daytime energy levels, and breathing during sleep as very important/important benefits of PAP. Children becoming dependent on PAP to sleep was reported as very important/important challenge by 76% of caregivers. Among the research priorities, improvement in breathing during sleep (77%) and reduction in the frequency of respiratory illness (73%) were the preferred PAP benefits. Mask-related issues (72%) and the child becoming dependent on PAP (57%) were considered priority challenges to research. Four themes emerged from open-ended questions: 1) better nights and days, 2) adapting to home PAP, 3) finding the right mask, and 4) the importance of a team approach.

Conclusions: Caregiver's priorities regarding PAP included known respiratory benefits of this therapy, such as improved breathing, but also less reported non-respiratory outcomes, which reflected in benefits for the entire family. Potential challenges of PAP requiring further research should focus on mask-related issues.

照顾者对儿童家庭气道正压治疗的优先结果:一项混合方法研究。
研究目的:确定护理人员报告的关于儿童家庭气道正压通气(PAP)的益处、挑战和进一步见解的优先级。方法:采用混合方法对儿童父母/照顾者在线问卷调查结果进行分析。结果:73名照顾者完成了调查,其中82%为母亲。超过90%的人认为改善睡眠、休息、白天的能量水平和睡眠中的呼吸是PAP非常重要的好处。76%的护理人员认为,儿童依赖PAP入睡是非常重要的挑战。在研究重点中,改善睡眠呼吸(77%)和减少呼吸系统疾病的频率(73%)是PAP的首选益处。口罩相关问题(72%)和儿童依赖PAP(57%)被认为是研究的优先挑战。从开放式问题中产生了四个主题:1)更好的夜晚和白天,2)适应家庭PAP, 3)找到合适的口罩,以及4)团队合作的重要性。结论:护理人员对PAP的优先考虑包括该疗法已知的呼吸益处,如呼吸改善,但也有较少报道的非呼吸结果,这反映了整个家庭的益处。PAP需要进一步研究的潜在挑战应集中在口罩相关问题上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信