{"title":"Oral health-related quality of life of orthodontic clear aligner versus conventional fixed appliance during treatment: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Nancy M Ajwa","doi":"10.1177/09287329251326022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOrthodontic clear aligners are a technologically advanced treatment modality that improves aesthetics and comfort while impacting patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).ObjectiveThis study assessed and compared the OHRQoL of adult orthodontic patients receiving clear aligners and fixed appliances (metal and ceramic brackets) during orthodontic treatments.MethodologyOne hundred and five orthodontic patients were recruited and classified according to the treatment received. Group 1 clear aligners, group 2- fixed appliances/metal brackets, and Group 3-fixed appliances/ceramic brackets. The patients were surveyed using an Arabic version of the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP- 14) questionnaire before (T0), 1-week (T1), and 3-months (T2) after the start of orthodontic treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS software at a significance level set at ≤0.05.ResultsThe mean OHIP scores showed no significant difference between the 3 groups at T0 (p = 0.09) and T2 (p = 0.41) time intervals. On the contrary, the mean OHIP scores at T1 significantly differed between 3 groups (p = 0.03). The mean OHIP scores within the groups at different time intervals was significantly different. Multiple comparison within the groups showed significant reduction in the mean OHIP scores from T0 to T1 and T2 period and further from T1 to T2 period, and the mean differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).ConclusionAdult patients treated with clear aligners had significantly higher OHRQoL than those who underwent conventional fixed bracket-based treatment after 7 days of treatment but OHRQoL was similar after three months of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251326022"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251326022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundOrthodontic clear aligners are a technologically advanced treatment modality that improves aesthetics and comfort while impacting patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).ObjectiveThis study assessed and compared the OHRQoL of adult orthodontic patients receiving clear aligners and fixed appliances (metal and ceramic brackets) during orthodontic treatments.MethodologyOne hundred and five orthodontic patients were recruited and classified according to the treatment received. Group 1 clear aligners, group 2- fixed appliances/metal brackets, and Group 3-fixed appliances/ceramic brackets. The patients were surveyed using an Arabic version of the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP- 14) questionnaire before (T0), 1-week (T1), and 3-months (T2) after the start of orthodontic treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS software at a significance level set at ≤0.05.ResultsThe mean OHIP scores showed no significant difference between the 3 groups at T0 (p = 0.09) and T2 (p = 0.41) time intervals. On the contrary, the mean OHIP scores at T1 significantly differed between 3 groups (p = 0.03). The mean OHIP scores within the groups at different time intervals was significantly different. Multiple comparison within the groups showed significant reduction in the mean OHIP scores from T0 to T1 and T2 period and further from T1 to T2 period, and the mean differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).ConclusionAdult patients treated with clear aligners had significantly higher OHRQoL than those who underwent conventional fixed bracket-based treatment after 7 days of treatment but OHRQoL was similar after three months of treatment.
期刊介绍:
Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered:
1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables.
2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words.
Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics.
4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors.
5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).