Dynamic loading leakage test of dental abutment/implant connections based upon a novel implant system with an abutment switch feature: an in vitro study.

Timea Mezey, Christoph Bourauel, Ludger Keilig
{"title":"Dynamic loading leakage test of dental abutment/implant connections based upon a novel implant system with an abutment switch feature: an <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Timea Mezey, Christoph Bourauel, Ludger Keilig","doi":"10.1515/bmt-2025-0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of the implant-abutment interface in a specific implant system in comparison to other implant systems under conditions of increasing dynamic loading.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three different implants and four abutment types were tested: one implant with a conical abutment connection, one implant with a flat abutment connection, and one implant with an abutment switch feature and two different abutment connections. The tests consisted of a phase of cyclic loading followed by a leakage test. The maximum loading force was increased, and the procedure was repeated, until either the implant-abutment connection failed, or a leakage was detected. Loading criteria were modified based on the ISO standard 14801:2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conical implant abutment connections exhibited fracture prior to leakage at varying failure forces and loading cycles, whereas the platform abutment type showed leakage or fracture at a relatively low force. The two different abutment types used on the same implant system showed extremely different results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Literature shows similar high chewing forces mostly only for healthy subjects. For patients with dental implants, leakage is still preferable to fracture. In conclusion, the test showed that some implants with a conical abutment are more resistant to leakage and may be preferable if higher chewing forces are expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":93905,"journal":{"name":"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2025-0141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of the implant-abutment interface in a specific implant system in comparison to other implant systems under conditions of increasing dynamic loading.

Methods: Three different implants and four abutment types were tested: one implant with a conical abutment connection, one implant with a flat abutment connection, and one implant with an abutment switch feature and two different abutment connections. The tests consisted of a phase of cyclic loading followed by a leakage test. The maximum loading force was increased, and the procedure was repeated, until either the implant-abutment connection failed, or a leakage was detected. Loading criteria were modified based on the ISO standard 14801:2016.

Results: The conical implant abutment connections exhibited fracture prior to leakage at varying failure forces and loading cycles, whereas the platform abutment type showed leakage or fracture at a relatively low force. The two different abutment types used on the same implant system showed extremely different results.

Conclusions: Literature shows similar high chewing forces mostly only for healthy subjects. For patients with dental implants, leakage is still preferable to fracture. In conclusion, the test showed that some implants with a conical abutment are more resistant to leakage and may be preferable if higher chewing forces are expected.

基于基台开关特性的新型种植体系统的牙基/种植体连接动态载荷泄漏试验:体外研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估在增加动态载荷的条件下,与其他种植体系统相比,特定种植体系统中种植体-基台界面的密封能力。方法:对三种不同种植体和四种基台进行测试:一种是锥形基台连接方式,一种是扁平基台连接方式,一种是切换基台连接方式,两种不同的基台连接方式。试验包括一个阶段的循环加载,然后是泄漏试验。增加最大载荷力,并重复该过程,直到种植体-基台连接失败或检测到泄漏。加载标准根据ISO标准14801:2016进行了修改。结果:在不同的破坏力和加载周期下,锥形种植体基台连接在泄漏前发生断裂,而平台型基台连接在相对较低的力下发生泄漏或断裂。在同一种植体系统上使用两种不同的基台,结果差异极大。结论:文献显示类似的高咀嚼力大多只存在于健康受试者。对于种植牙的患者,渗漏仍然优于骨折。综上所述,试验结果表明,锥形基牙种植体具有更好的抗漏性,如果期望更高的咀嚼力,则可能是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信