Palliative care competencies: a bioethical analysis of medical students' education.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Manuela Torrado Truiti, Carla Corradi Perini, Úrsula Bueno do Prado Guirro
{"title":"Palliative care competencies: a bioethical analysis of medical students' education.","authors":"Manuela Torrado Truiti, Carla Corradi Perini, Úrsula Bueno do Prado Guirro","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07265-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With technological advancements, health education has predominantly focused on technical aspects, neglecting human values. Palliative care (PC), seeking holistic care, becomes crucial in this context, and for its development, the World Health Organization has defined its education and teaching as one of the essential pillars. PC emphasizes patient dignity, autonomy, and holistic well-being, reflecting Thomasma and Pellegrino's beneficence-in-trust model, fostering trust and ethical care.The aim of this research was to analyze, through the bioethics perspective, the acquisition of PC competencies among medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, quantitative study assessed 360 medical students from a public university in Paraná, using the Pallicomp tool questionnaire to evaluate PC competencies. Data were analyzed using statistical methods, comparing scores across academic cycles and prior PC coursework. Findings were interpreted through bioethical principles and Pellegrino and Thomasma's beneficence-in-trust model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Basic cycle students presented a higher overall score than those in the internship, with statistical difference, and the individual analysis of competencies did not reveal an increase throughout the course. When considering the overall score between students who took PC courses and those who did not, there was no statistically significant difference. Deficiencies were observed in key areas involving bioethical principles, including symptom management, compassionate communication, spirituality, and interdisciplinary teamwork.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed gaps in PC education among medical students, with scores below 70% across academic cycles and a decline from basic to internship levels. The findings highlight deficiencies in holistic, patient-centered competencies, including psychological and spiritual care, interdisciplinary teamwork, and communication. Addressing these gaps requires integrating bioethical principles and practical training throughout medical education to foster ethical, humanized, and comprehensive care, aligning with the beneficence-in-trust model.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07265-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With technological advancements, health education has predominantly focused on technical aspects, neglecting human values. Palliative care (PC), seeking holistic care, becomes crucial in this context, and for its development, the World Health Organization has defined its education and teaching as one of the essential pillars. PC emphasizes patient dignity, autonomy, and holistic well-being, reflecting Thomasma and Pellegrino's beneficence-in-trust model, fostering trust and ethical care.The aim of this research was to analyze, through the bioethics perspective, the acquisition of PC competencies among medical students.

Methods: This cross-sectional, quantitative study assessed 360 medical students from a public university in Paraná, using the Pallicomp tool questionnaire to evaluate PC competencies. Data were analyzed using statistical methods, comparing scores across academic cycles and prior PC coursework. Findings were interpreted through bioethical principles and Pellegrino and Thomasma's beneficence-in-trust model.

Results: Basic cycle students presented a higher overall score than those in the internship, with statistical difference, and the individual analysis of competencies did not reveal an increase throughout the course. When considering the overall score between students who took PC courses and those who did not, there was no statistically significant difference. Deficiencies were observed in key areas involving bioethical principles, including symptom management, compassionate communication, spirituality, and interdisciplinary teamwork.

Conclusions: This study revealed gaps in PC education among medical students, with scores below 70% across academic cycles and a decline from basic to internship levels. The findings highlight deficiencies in holistic, patient-centered competencies, including psychological and spiritual care, interdisciplinary teamwork, and communication. Addressing these gaps requires integrating bioethical principles and practical training throughout medical education to foster ethical, humanized, and comprehensive care, aligning with the beneficence-in-trust model.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

缓和疗护能力:医学生教育的生物伦理分析。
背景:随着技术的进步,健康教育主要集中在技术方面,忽视了人的价值。在这种情况下,寻求整体护理的姑息治疗(PC)变得至关重要,为了其发展,世界卫生组织已将其教育和教学确定为基本支柱之一。PC强调患者的尊严、自主权和整体福祉,反映了托马斯和佩莱格里诺的信托慈善模式,促进了信任和道德关怀。本研究旨在从生命伦理学的角度分析医学生电脑能力的习得。方法:本横断面定量研究评估了来自帕拉帕拉一所公立大学的360名医学生,使用Pallicomp工具问卷来评估PC能力。使用统计方法对数据进行分析,比较整个学术周期和之前的PC课程的分数。研究结果通过生物伦理原则和Pellegrino和Thomasma的慈善信托模型进行解释。结果:基础周期学生的整体得分高于实习阶段学生,且差异有统计学意义,能力的个体分析并未显示出在整个课程中有所提高。在考虑上过计算机课程的学生和没有上过计算机课程的学生的综合分数时,没有统计学上的显著差异。在涉及生物伦理原则的关键领域,包括症状管理、富有同情心的沟通、灵性和跨学科团队合作,观察到缺陷。结论:本研究揭示了医学生PC教育的差距,在整个学术周期中得分低于70%,并且从基础水平下降到实习水平。研究结果强调了整体的、以病人为中心的能力的不足,包括心理和精神护理、跨学科的团队合作和沟通。解决这些差距需要在整个医学教育中整合生物伦理原则和实践培训,以促进符合伦理、人性化和全面的护理,与慈善信托模式保持一致。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信