{"title":"Augmented intelligence in oral and maxillofacial radiology: a systematic review","authors":"Swarna Yerebairapura Math BDS, MDS, MFDS RCPS, PhD student , Nazila Ameli DDS, MSc, PhD , Cristine Miron Stefani DDS, MScs, PhD , Janice Y. Kung MLIS , Kumaradevan Punithakumar MASc, PhD , Maryam Amin DMD, MSc, PhD , Camila Pacheco-Pereira DDS, MBA, MScs, PhD, MS/Dip OMR, FRCDC","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming diagnostic imaging in dentistry. This systematic review evaluates existing literature on augmented intelligence in dentomaxillofacial radiology, focusing on its influence on human collaboration in interpreting dental imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>A literature search across seven databases and gray literature was conducted. Studies evaluating clinician performance with AI-assistance were included, while reviews, surveys, and case reports were excluded. The QUADAS-2 tool assessed the risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen studies assessed the influence of AI on radiographic interpretation. AI-assisted caries detection consistently improved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Detection of apical pathoses and jaw lesion segmentation improved accuracy, reducing diagnostic time. Cephalometric landmark identification showed increased accuracy, particularly for students. Soft tissue calcification detection improved accuracy, but sensitivity decreased. Overall, augmented intelligence enhanced interobserver agreement and reduced diagnostic variability, with general dentists and students showing the greatest gains.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Augmented intelligence enhances dental radiographic interpretation by improving tasks, particularly for less experienced clinicians, and positively influences clinical decision-making. However, AI performance remains inconsistent in challenging cases involving complex pathoses or varied imaging conditions. While it complements rather than replaces clinicians, further validation of AI's generalizability and reliability using larger, diverse datasets is necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"140 2","pages":"Pages 237-250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440325008466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming diagnostic imaging in dentistry. This systematic review evaluates existing literature on augmented intelligence in dentomaxillofacial radiology, focusing on its influence on human collaboration in interpreting dental imaging.
Study Design
A literature search across seven databases and gray literature was conducted. Studies evaluating clinician performance with AI-assistance were included, while reviews, surveys, and case reports were excluded. The QUADAS-2 tool assessed the risk of bias.
Results
Sixteen studies assessed the influence of AI on radiographic interpretation. AI-assisted caries detection consistently improved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Detection of apical pathoses and jaw lesion segmentation improved accuracy, reducing diagnostic time. Cephalometric landmark identification showed increased accuracy, particularly for students. Soft tissue calcification detection improved accuracy, but sensitivity decreased. Overall, augmented intelligence enhanced interobserver agreement and reduced diagnostic variability, with general dentists and students showing the greatest gains.
Conclusions
Augmented intelligence enhances dental radiographic interpretation by improving tasks, particularly for less experienced clinicians, and positively influences clinical decision-making. However, AI performance remains inconsistent in challenging cases involving complex pathoses or varied imaging conditions. While it complements rather than replaces clinicians, further validation of AI's generalizability and reliability using larger, diverse datasets is necessary.
期刊介绍:
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.