Use of Metagenomic Microbial Plasma Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing Assay in Outpatient Rheumatology Practice.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rachel A Jenkins, Matthew J Samec, Courtney A Arment, Kenneth J Warrington, John M Davis, Matthew J Koster
{"title":"Use of Metagenomic Microbial Plasma Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing Assay in Outpatient Rheumatology Practice.","authors":"Rachel A Jenkins, Matthew J Samec, Courtney A Arment, Kenneth J Warrington, John M Davis, Matthew J Koster","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the utility of a metagenomic microbial plasma cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing assay (Karius Test [KT]) in the evaluation of patients in an outpatient rheumatology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with a KT ordered and obtained by a rheumatology provider in the outpatient setting from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2022, were retrospectively identified. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiologic, histopathology, and microbial studies were abstracted. Indication for KT testing was categorized. KT results were defined based on positive result and clinical relevance regarding the symptoms under investigation at the time of the rheumatologic investigation. Review of cases 3 months after KT was undertaken to determine clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty patients with a KT were included (52.7% female, mean age 52 years). The reason for KT was evaluation of atypical presentation of rheumatic disease (80%), assessing flare vs infection in patients on immunosuppression (16.7%), and fever of unknown origin (3.3%). Twenty-four (16%) KTs were positive, 6 of which were considered clinically relevant and altered the final diagnosis and treatment. Of the 126 negative KTs, 5 (4%) were found to have a clinically relevant infection by conventional testing methodologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large retrospective cohort study, the most frequent reason for KT utilization was an atypical presentation of rheumatic disease. One out of 4 positive KTs altered the final diagnosis and treatment. False negative rates were low. KT has utility in outpatient rheumatology assessments. Further delineation of which patients are best suited for KT testing remains to be defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the utility of a metagenomic microbial plasma cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing assay (Karius Test [KT]) in the evaluation of patients in an outpatient rheumatology practice.

Methods: All patients with a KT ordered and obtained by a rheumatology provider in the outpatient setting from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2022, were retrospectively identified. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiologic, histopathology, and microbial studies were abstracted. Indication for KT testing was categorized. KT results were defined based on positive result and clinical relevance regarding the symptoms under investigation at the time of the rheumatologic investigation. Review of cases 3 months after KT was undertaken to determine clinical outcome.

Results: One hundred fifty patients with a KT were included (52.7% female, mean age 52 years). The reason for KT was evaluation of atypical presentation of rheumatic disease (80%), assessing flare vs infection in patients on immunosuppression (16.7%), and fever of unknown origin (3.3%). Twenty-four (16%) KTs were positive, 6 of which were considered clinically relevant and altered the final diagnosis and treatment. Of the 126 negative KTs, 5 (4%) were found to have a clinically relevant infection by conventional testing methodologies.

Conclusion: In this large retrospective cohort study, the most frequent reason for KT utilization was an atypical presentation of rheumatic disease. One out of 4 positive KTs altered the final diagnosis and treatment. False negative rates were low. KT has utility in outpatient rheumatology assessments. Further delineation of which patients are best suited for KT testing remains to be defined.

元基因组微生物血浆无细胞DNA新一代测序测定在门诊风湿病实践中的应用。
目的:评价元基因组微生物无浆细胞DNA新一代测序法(Karius TestTM;KT)在门诊风湿病实践中对患者的评估。方法:回顾性分析从2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日在门诊由风湿病提供者订购并获得KT的所有患者。人口统计学、临床、实验室、放射学、组织病理学和微生物学研究被摘要。对KT检测的适应症进行分类。KT结果是根据风湿病学调查时所调查症状的阳性结果和临床相关性来定义的。对KT术后3个月的病例进行复查以确定临床结果。结果:纳入150例KT患者(52.7%为女性,平均年龄52岁)。KT的原因是评估风湿病的非典型表现(80.0%),评估免疫抑制患者的耀斑与感染(16.7%),以及不明原因的发热(3.3%)。24例(16.0%)KTs阳性,其中6例被认为与临床相关并改变了最终的诊断和治疗。在126例阴性KTs中,通过常规检测方法发现5例(4.0%)存在临床相关感染。结论:在这项大型回顾性队列研究中,使用KT的最常见原因是风湿病的非典型表现。25%的阳性KTs改变了最终的诊断和治疗,而假阴性率为4.0%。KT在门诊风湿病评估中具有实用价值。哪些患者最适合进行KT检测的进一步界定仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信