Association of Intensive Care Unit Patient-to-Clinician Ratios with Mortality across Two U.S. Health Systems.

IF 5.4
Hayley B Gershengorn, George L Anesi, Vincent X Liu, Deena K Costa, Erich M Dress, Amy L Dzierba, Robert Fowler, Andrew A Kramer, Danny Lizano, Damon C Scales, Allan Garland, Hannah Wunsch
{"title":"Association of Intensive Care Unit Patient-to-Clinician Ratios with Mortality across Two U.S. Health Systems.","authors":"Hayley B Gershengorn, George L Anesi, Vincent X Liu, Deena K Costa, Erich M Dress, Amy L Dzierba, Robert Fowler, Andrew A Kramer, Danny Lizano, Damon C Scales, Allan Garland, Hannah Wunsch","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-045OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> The association of interprofessional team member workload with intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes is understudied. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the association of patient-to-intensivist ratio (PIR), patient-to-respiratory therapist ratio (PRTR), and patient-to-clinical pharmacist ratio (PpharmR) with hospital mortality. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective study of adults admitted from the emergency department to an ICU with acute respiratory failure or sepsis within two U.S. healthcare systems (2013-2018). Our primary exposures were patient-to-clinician ratios (PIR, PRTR, and PpharmR) averaged over the ICU stay; our primary outcome was hospital mortality. We used multivariable mixed-effects regression, with patient-to-clinician ratios modeled as restricted cubic splines (four knots). We primarily considered each exposure separately, then included all ratios together. <b>Results:</b> Our cohort included 45,036 patients (mean age, 66.0 [standard deviation, 16.6] years; 23,420 [52.0%] men) across 27 ICUs within 24 hospitals. Of these, 29,326 (65.1%) had acute respiratory failure, 32,434 (72.0%) had sepsis, and 9,675 (21.5%) died in the hospital. The average PIR was 9.3 (standard deviation, 3.6), and the average PRTR was 7.9 (standard deviation, 3.2); the average PpharmR was 15.0 (standard deviation, 5.5) among patients (<i>n</i> = 8,950 of 45,036) in ICUs with clinical pharmacists (<i>n</i> = 8 of 27). We found no significant association between average daily PIR (Wald test for all spline terms: <i>P</i> = 0.24) or PRTR (<i>P</i> = 0.18) and hospital mortality in the full cohort; similarly, among patients in ICUs with pharmacists, no significant association of PpharmR with mortality was observed (<i>P</i> = 0.08). Models including ratios together yielded similar null results. <b>Conclusions:</b> We did not identify an association of any average daily patient-to-clinician ratio with hospital mortality for U.S. ICU patients with sepsis or respiratory failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1372-1381"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-045OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: The association of interprofessional team member workload with intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes is understudied. Objectives: To evaluate the association of patient-to-intensivist ratio (PIR), patient-to-respiratory therapist ratio (PRTR), and patient-to-clinical pharmacist ratio (PpharmR) with hospital mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of adults admitted from the emergency department to an ICU with acute respiratory failure or sepsis within two U.S. healthcare systems (2013-2018). Our primary exposures were patient-to-clinician ratios (PIR, PRTR, and PpharmR) averaged over the ICU stay; our primary outcome was hospital mortality. We used multivariable mixed-effects regression, with patient-to-clinician ratios modeled as restricted cubic splines (four knots). We primarily considered each exposure separately, then included all ratios together. Results: Our cohort included 45,036 patients (mean age, 66.0 [standard deviation, 16.6] years; 23,420 [52.0%] men) across 27 ICUs within 24 hospitals. Of these, 29,326 (65.1%) had acute respiratory failure, 32,434 (72.0%) had sepsis, and 9,675 (21.5%) died in the hospital. The average PIR was 9.3 (standard deviation, 3.6), and the average PRTR was 7.9 (standard deviation, 3.2); the average PpharmR was 15.0 (standard deviation, 5.5) among patients (n = 8,950 of 45,036) in ICUs with clinical pharmacists (n = 8 of 27). We found no significant association between average daily PIR (Wald test for all spline terms: P = 0.24) or PRTR (P = 0.18) and hospital mortality in the full cohort; similarly, among patients in ICUs with pharmacists, no significant association of PpharmR with mortality was observed (P = 0.08). Models including ratios together yielded similar null results. Conclusions: We did not identify an association of any average daily patient-to-clinician ratio with hospital mortality for U.S. ICU patients with sepsis or respiratory failure.

美国两大卫生系统中ICU患者与临床医生比率与死亡率的关系
理由:跨专业团队成员工作量与ICU结果的关系尚未得到充分研究。目的评价患者与重症医师(PIR)、患者与呼吸治疗师(PRTR)和患者与临床药师(phpharmr)比率与医院死亡率的关系。方法:我们对美国两个医疗系统(2013-2018年)因急性呼吸衰竭或败血症从急诊科进入ICU的成年人进行了回顾性研究。我们的主要暴露是ICU住院期间的平均患者与临床医生比率(PIR, PRTR, phpharmr);我们的主要结局是住院死亡率。我们使用多变量混合效应回归,将患者与临床医生的比率建模为受限三次样条(4节)。我们首先单独考虑每个曝光,然后将所有比率纳入一起。我们的队列包括24家医院27个icu的45,036例患者(平均年龄66.0岁[标准差:16.6]岁,23,420例(52.0%)男性)。其中,29,326例(65.1%)发生急性呼吸衰竭,32,434例(72.0%)发生败血症,9,675例(21.5%)死于医院。平均PIR为9.3(标准差为3.6),PRTR为7.9 (3.2);有临床药师的icu患者(n=8,950/45,036)平均PpharmR为15.0(5.5)。我们发现,在整个队列中,平均每日PIR(所有样条项的Wald检验p=0.24)或PRTR (p=0.18)与住院死亡率之间没有显著关联;同样,在有药师的icu患者中,PpharmR与死亡率无显著相关性(p=0.08)。包括比率在内的模型得出了类似的无效结果。结论:我们没有发现美国ICU脓毒症或呼吸衰竭患者的平均每日患者与临床医生比率与住院死亡率之间存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信