Comparison of Non-invasive Methods for Diagnosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Before Bariatric Surgery and Postoperative Follow-up in Obese Patients.

Ji-Hyeon Park, Seong Min Kim, Dae Ho Lee
{"title":"Comparison of Non-invasive Methods for Diagnosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Before Bariatric Surgery and Postoperative Follow-up in Obese Patients.","authors":"Ji-Hyeon Park, Seong Min Kim, Dae Ho Lee","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2025.14.1.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to identify the most accurate and useful non-invasive method to replace liver biopsy for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) before bariatric surgery and postoperative follow-up in morbidly obese patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-center study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 68 morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with intraoperative liver biopsy. Preoperative non-invasive diagnostic methods, including fatty liver index, NAFLD fibrosis score, enhanced liver fibrosis score, FibroScan, magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-PDFF, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) were compared against liver biopsy results. Diagnostic performance was assessed using Spearman's correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Liver biopsy confirmed the presence of steatosis in 92.7% of patients, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in 64.7%, and liver fibrosis (≥F1) in 72.0%. MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for NASH, with the strongest correlation with histological findings. For liver fibrosis, MRE showed the strongest correlation with histological fibrosis stage, while FibroScan-Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) demonstrated better diagnostic performance in ROC analysis. However, the overall diagnostic quality of non-invasive methods for fibrosis assessment remained modest, with no method achieving a quality value above 0.6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF were the most accurate noninvasive methods for diagnosing NASH in morbidly obese patients. For liver fibrosis, FibroScan-LSM may be more suitable for detection, while MRE may better reflect fibrosis severity. Further studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness and clinical applicability of these methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2025.14.1.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify the most accurate and useful non-invasive method to replace liver biopsy for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) before bariatric surgery and postoperative follow-up in morbidly obese patients.

Materials and methods: This single-center study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 68 morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with intraoperative liver biopsy. Preoperative non-invasive diagnostic methods, including fatty liver index, NAFLD fibrosis score, enhanced liver fibrosis score, FibroScan, magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-PDFF, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) were compared against liver biopsy results. Diagnostic performance was assessed using Spearman's correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Liver biopsy confirmed the presence of steatosis in 92.7% of patients, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in 64.7%, and liver fibrosis (≥F1) in 72.0%. MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for NASH, with the strongest correlation with histological findings. For liver fibrosis, MRE showed the strongest correlation with histological fibrosis stage, while FibroScan-Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) demonstrated better diagnostic performance in ROC analysis. However, the overall diagnostic quality of non-invasive methods for fibrosis assessment remained modest, with no method achieving a quality value above 0.6.

Conclusion: MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF were the most accurate noninvasive methods for diagnosing NASH in morbidly obese patients. For liver fibrosis, FibroScan-LSM may be more suitable for detection, while MRE may better reflect fibrosis severity. Further studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness and clinical applicability of these methods.

非酒精性脂肪肝术前和术后随访无创诊断方法的比较
目的:本研究旨在确定最准确和有用的非侵入性方法,以取代肝活检诊断非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)在减肥术前和术后随访的病态肥胖患者。材料和方法:本单中心研究回顾性分析了68例接受腹腔镜袖式胃切除术并术中肝活检的病态肥胖患者的前瞻性数据。术前无创诊断方法,包括脂肪肝指数、NAFLD纤维化评分、肝纤维化增强评分、FibroScan、磁共振成像-质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF)、磁共振波谱(MRS)-PDFF、磁共振弹性成像(MRE)与肝活检结果进行比较。采用Spearman相关和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估诊断效果。结果:肝活检证实92.7%的患者存在脂肪变性,64.7%的患者存在非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH), 72.0%的患者存在肝纤维化(≥F1)。MRI-PDFF和MRS-PDFF对NASH的诊断准确性最高,与组织学结果的相关性最强。对于肝纤维化,MRE与组织学纤维化分期相关性最强,而FibroScan-Liver刚度测量(LSM)在ROC分析中表现出更好的诊断性能。然而,非侵入性纤维化评估方法的总体诊断质量仍然一般,没有一种方法达到0.6以上的质量值。结论:MRI-PDFF和MRS-PDFF是诊断病态肥胖患者NASH最准确的无创方法。对于肝纤维化,FibroScan-LSM可能更适合检测,而MRE可能更能反映纤维化的严重程度。需要进一步的研究来评估这些方法的成本效益和临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信