Cultural variability in dementia caregiver motivations: Unraveling unique and common drivers.

Najoua Lazaar, Floor Flurij, Rozemarijn L van Bruchem-Visser, Janne M Papma, Sanne Franzen
{"title":"Cultural variability in dementia caregiver motivations: Unraveling unique and common drivers.","authors":"Najoua Lazaar, Floor Flurij, Rozemarijn L van Bruchem-Visser, Janne M Papma, Sanne Franzen","doi":"10.1177/14713012251327461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> In the Netherlands, approximately 800,000 individuals act as informal caregivers for people with dementia. Current policies prioritize care within the home setting, often relying on informal caregivers for support, assisted by care professionals. Given the wide ethnocultural diversity among dementia caregivers in the Netherlands, it is crucial to understand how these cultural differences influence caregiving. Given the emphasis on researching barriers to providing care in literature, this study specifically focused on motivators and facilitators to providing care. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted semi-structured interviews, both with caregivers of native Dutch patients (<i>n</i> = 11) and caregivers of patients with a migration background (<i>n</i> = 9), who all provided care at home for patients with dementia. Data was collected using an interview guide and open, axial and selective coding were used to analyze the transcripts of the interviews in Atlas.ti. <b>Results:</b> Four themes were identified. First, culturally shared motivators to providing care emerged, such as having a unique bond with the person with dementia and themes of reciprocity. Second, culture specific perspectives were identified, with Dutch caregivers often spontaneously reporting considering professional care, while culturally diverse caregivers stressed the available network of informal caregivers and their ability to persevere. Third, personal philosophies on life were a driver to provide care for caregivers of native Dutch patients, while religion mainly served as a source of strength in continuing to provide care in the culturally diverse group. Lastly, adult child caregivers benefit from supportive home environments and from using structure and routine in providing care. <b>Discussion:</b> Our findings show that the decision to provide care often seems driven by reciprocity and the prior quality of the relationship with the person with dementia, contrasting with previous work suggesting that religion is a main reason to provide care. Several recommendations are made how care professionals can take these factors into consideration when assisting caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251327461"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251327461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the Netherlands, approximately 800,000 individuals act as informal caregivers for people with dementia. Current policies prioritize care within the home setting, often relying on informal caregivers for support, assisted by care professionals. Given the wide ethnocultural diversity among dementia caregivers in the Netherlands, it is crucial to understand how these cultural differences influence caregiving. Given the emphasis on researching barriers to providing care in literature, this study specifically focused on motivators and facilitators to providing care. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews, both with caregivers of native Dutch patients (n = 11) and caregivers of patients with a migration background (n = 9), who all provided care at home for patients with dementia. Data was collected using an interview guide and open, axial and selective coding were used to analyze the transcripts of the interviews in Atlas.ti. Results: Four themes were identified. First, culturally shared motivators to providing care emerged, such as having a unique bond with the person with dementia and themes of reciprocity. Second, culture specific perspectives were identified, with Dutch caregivers often spontaneously reporting considering professional care, while culturally diverse caregivers stressed the available network of informal caregivers and their ability to persevere. Third, personal philosophies on life were a driver to provide care for caregivers of native Dutch patients, while religion mainly served as a source of strength in continuing to provide care in the culturally diverse group. Lastly, adult child caregivers benefit from supportive home environments and from using structure and routine in providing care. Discussion: Our findings show that the decision to provide care often seems driven by reciprocity and the prior quality of the relationship with the person with dementia, contrasting with previous work suggesting that religion is a main reason to provide care. Several recommendations are made how care professionals can take these factors into consideration when assisting caregivers.

痴呆症护理动机的文化差异:揭示独特和共同的驱动因素。
简介:在荷兰,大约有80万人作为痴呆症患者的非正式照顾者。目前的政策优先考虑家庭环境中的护理,通常依靠非正式护理人员的支持,并由护理专业人员协助。鉴于荷兰痴呆症护理人员中广泛的种族文化多样性,了解这些文化差异如何影响护理是至关重要的。鉴于文献研究的重点是提供护理的障碍,本研究特别关注提供护理的激励因素和促进因素。方法:我们对荷兰本土患者的护理人员(n = 11)和具有移民背景的患者的护理人员(n = 9)进行了半结构化访谈,他们都在家中为痴呆症患者提供护理。采用访谈指南收集资料,采用开放编码、轴向编码和选择性编码对Atlas.ti的访谈记录进行分析。结果:确定了四个主题。首先,文化上共同的提供护理的动机出现了,比如与痴呆症患者有一种独特的联系,以及互惠的主题。其次,文化特定的观点被确定,荷兰护理人员经常自发地报告考虑专业护理,而文化多样化的护理人员强调可用的非正式护理人员网络及其坚持不懈的能力。第三,个人的生活哲学是为荷兰本土患者的护理人员提供护理的驱动因素,而宗教主要是在文化多元化的群体中继续提供护理的力量来源。最后,成年儿童照顾者受益于支持性的家庭环境以及在提供照顾时使用的结构和常规。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,提供护理的决定往往是由互惠和与痴呆症患者的先前关系质量驱动的,与之前的研究表明宗教是提供护理的主要原因形成对比。提出了一些建议,建议护理专业人员在协助护理人员时如何考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信