Saccade-induced temporal distortion: opposing effects of time expansion and compression.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Lingyue Chen, Lukasz Grzeczkowski, Hermann J Müller, Zhuanghua Shi
{"title":"Saccade-induced temporal distortion: opposing effects of time expansion and compression.","authors":"Lingyue Chen, Lukasz Grzeczkowski, Hermann J Müller, Zhuanghua Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00426-025-02116-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Saccadic eye movements, or saccades, can distort our perception of time, as evidenced by the phenomenon of Chronostasis, where the first event after a saccade appears to last longer than it actually does. However, the impact of saccades on events following the first has never been explored. Here, we compared how participants perceived durations of first and second intervals after a saccade with their perceived durations during fixation, where no saccades occurred. We found that saccades lengthened the perceived duration of the first event, confirming Chronostasis. Moreover, when the second event occurred right after the first, its duration was perceived as shorter. Interestingly, when the second event was used as a reference, the Chronostasis effect was even stronger. Notably, this shortening of the second event persisted even when we ruled out processes like the \"attentional blink\" that might interfere with the timing between the two events. Our findings suggest that saccades induce a brief, uneven distribution of attentional processing in time, leading to an overestimation of the first and an underestimation of the second interval when the two intervals occur close together.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"89 2","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02116-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements, or saccades, can distort our perception of time, as evidenced by the phenomenon of Chronostasis, where the first event after a saccade appears to last longer than it actually does. However, the impact of saccades on events following the first has never been explored. Here, we compared how participants perceived durations of first and second intervals after a saccade with their perceived durations during fixation, where no saccades occurred. We found that saccades lengthened the perceived duration of the first event, confirming Chronostasis. Moreover, when the second event occurred right after the first, its duration was perceived as shorter. Interestingly, when the second event was used as a reference, the Chronostasis effect was even stronger. Notably, this shortening of the second event persisted even when we ruled out processes like the "attentional blink" that might interfere with the timing between the two events. Our findings suggest that saccades induce a brief, uneven distribution of attentional processing in time, leading to an overestimation of the first and an underestimation of the second interval when the two intervals occur close together.

眼跳诱发的时间扭曲:时间膨胀和时间压缩的相反效应。
扫视眼运动(或称扫视)会扭曲我们对时间的感知,时间停滞现象就是明证,即扫视后的第一个事件似乎比实际持续的时间要长。然而,扫视对第一次扫视之后的事件的影响从未被探索过。在这里,我们比较了参与者在扫视后第一次和第二次间隔的持续时间与他们在注视时的持续时间,在没有扫视发生的情况下。我们发现扫视延长了第一个事件的感知持续时间,证实了时间停滞。此外,当第二个事件发生在第一个事件之后时,它的持续时间被认为更短。有趣的是,当第二个事件被用作参考时,时间平衡效应甚至更强。值得注意的是,即使我们排除了像“注意力眨眼”这样可能干扰两个事件之间时间的过程,第二个事件的缩短仍然存在。我们的研究结果表明,扫视在时间上引起了短暂的、不均匀的注意加工分布,当两个间隔发生在一起时,导致了对第一个间隔的高估和对第二个间隔的低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信