Linguistic Measurement Invariance and Stability-Equivalence of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Among Bilingual Participants.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Philippe Leclerc, Yann Le Corff, Mélanie Lapalme, Vincent Bégin, Karine Forget, Dominick Gamache, Claudia Savard, Jean-Pierre Rolland
{"title":"Linguistic Measurement Invariance and Stability-Equivalence of the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> Among Bilingual Participants.","authors":"Philippe Leclerc, Yann Le Corff, Mélanie Lapalme, Vincent Bégin, Karine Forget, Dominick Gamache, Claudia Savard, Jean-Pierre Rolland","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.2.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The linguistic equivalence of the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> (PID-5) has never been investigated using a within-subject design, that is, among bilingual individuals. Also, the stability-equivalence of the PID-5 using two linguistic versions is unknown. Thus, this within-subject, test-retest study aims at (a) establishing the measurement invariance of the PID-5 among bilinguals, and (b) providing indices of stability-equivalence using distinct versions with tight confidence intervals. Data from a sample of bilingual participants (<i>N</i> = 605), who were administered the PID-5 over a 1-2-week interval in French and English, were utilized. The PID-5 reached the (full) strong invariance level using longitudinal invariance analyses, indicating that the PID-5 structure is the same and that scores are interchangeable, while controlling for sampling confounds. The indices of stability-equivalence were high across traits. The PID-5 yields scores reflective of genuine differences, at least at the domain level, providing solid ground to study personality across societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 2","pages":"133-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.2.133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The linguistic equivalence of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) has never been investigated using a within-subject design, that is, among bilingual individuals. Also, the stability-equivalence of the PID-5 using two linguistic versions is unknown. Thus, this within-subject, test-retest study aims at (a) establishing the measurement invariance of the PID-5 among bilinguals, and (b) providing indices of stability-equivalence using distinct versions with tight confidence intervals. Data from a sample of bilingual participants (N = 605), who were administered the PID-5 over a 1-2-week interval in French and English, were utilized. The PID-5 reached the (full) strong invariance level using longitudinal invariance analyses, indicating that the PID-5 structure is the same and that scores are interchangeable, while controlling for sampling confounds. The indices of stability-equivalence were high across traits. The PID-5 yields scores reflective of genuine differences, at least at the domain level, providing solid ground to study personality across societies.

DSM-5中双语被试人格量表的语言测量不变性与稳定性等价性。
DSM-5 (PID-5)的人格量表的语言等值性从未在受试者内设计中进行过调查,即在双语个体中。此外,使用两种语言版本的PID-5的稳定性等效性是未知的。因此,本研究旨在(a)建立双语者PID-5的测量不变性,(b)使用具有紧密置信区间的不同版本提供稳定性-等效性指标。数据来自双语参与者(N = 605)的样本,他们在1-2周的间隔内用法语和英语进行PID-5测试。通过纵向不变性分析,PID-5达到了(完全)强不变性水平,表明PID-5的结构是相同的,分数是可互换的,同时控制了抽样混淆。各性状稳定性-等效性指数均较高。PID-5的得分反映了真正的差异,至少在领域层面上,为研究不同社会的个性提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Disorders has long been the only forum devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant personality disorders. The journal fosters dialogue among researchers and practitioners working from a variety of orientations and approaches. Its international impact is well established, with subscribers in over 30 countries. This multidisciplinary journal regularly features: - Research on normal and pathological personality and development - New methodologies for assessing personality - Etiologies and clinical classifications for personality disorders - Epidemiological studies and outcomes research on diagnostic criteria - Treatment techniques and innovations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信