Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A qualitative study protocol.

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Alana M W LeBrón, Melina Michelen, Brittany Morey, Gloria I Montiel Hernandez, Patricia Cantero, Salvador Zarate, Mary Anne Foo, Samantha Peralta, Jacqueline J Chow, Julia Mangione, Sora Tanjasiri, John Billimek
{"title":"Community Activation to TrAnsform Local sYSTems (CATALYST): A qualitative study protocol.","authors":"Alana M W LeBrón, Melina Michelen, Brittany Morey, Gloria I Montiel Hernandez, Patricia Cantero, Salvador Zarate, Mary Anne Foo, Samantha Peralta, Jacqueline J Chow, Julia Mangione, Sora Tanjasiri, John Billimek","doi":"10.1177/16094069241284217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community Health Workers, promotores, and navigators (henceforth, CHWs) emerged as critical members of the public health workforce addressing social, economic, and health inequities worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. While there is increasing appreciation for and utilization of CHW models, and recognition of the importance of tailoring and innovating these models during the pandemic, few studies have examined the processes of change by which CHW models operated during the COVID-19 pandemic, and factors that facilitated or constrained CHW health equity efforts. This protocol paper describes and reflects on the research methodology used in our qualitative study focused on CHWs. The CATALYST study aims to examine the roles that CHWs served during the COVID-19 pandemic and facilitators and barriers related to CHW health equity strategies. This qualitative study incorporates the lived experiences of CHWs, low-income communities of color whom CHWs engaged, and institutional representatives and policymakers familiar with locally implemented CHW models during the pandemic. Through a community-based participatory research process, this study involves an abductive qualitative approach to data collection and analysis. We integrate community member expertise alongside CHW and health equity frameworks in designing the research questions and data collection process. Additionally, we use an analytic approach that combines inductive (drawn from qualitative data) and deductive codes (drawn from theoretical frameworks and practice-based evidence integrated through a participatory research process) and nimbly leverages flexible coding to address inductive themes and practice-based questions. Our collaborative process offers concrete strategies to develop qualitative research protocols with community partners, with evidence used to inform policy, programmatic, and relational changes to support and amplify CHW models to promote community health and health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","volume":"23 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241284217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community Health Workers, promotores, and navigators (henceforth, CHWs) emerged as critical members of the public health workforce addressing social, economic, and health inequities worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. While there is increasing appreciation for and utilization of CHW models, and recognition of the importance of tailoring and innovating these models during the pandemic, few studies have examined the processes of change by which CHW models operated during the COVID-19 pandemic, and factors that facilitated or constrained CHW health equity efforts. This protocol paper describes and reflects on the research methodology used in our qualitative study focused on CHWs. The CATALYST study aims to examine the roles that CHWs served during the COVID-19 pandemic and facilitators and barriers related to CHW health equity strategies. This qualitative study incorporates the lived experiences of CHWs, low-income communities of color whom CHWs engaged, and institutional representatives and policymakers familiar with locally implemented CHW models during the pandemic. Through a community-based participatory research process, this study involves an abductive qualitative approach to data collection and analysis. We integrate community member expertise alongside CHW and health equity frameworks in designing the research questions and data collection process. Additionally, we use an analytic approach that combines inductive (drawn from qualitative data) and deductive codes (drawn from theoretical frameworks and practice-based evidence integrated through a participatory research process) and nimbly leverages flexible coding to address inductive themes and practice-based questions. Our collaborative process offers concrete strategies to develop qualitative research protocols with community partners, with evidence used to inform policy, programmatic, and relational changes to support and amplify CHW models to promote community health and health equity.

社区激活改造地方系统(CATALYST):一个定性研究协议。
社区卫生工作者、促进者和导航员(以下简称社区卫生工作者)成为公共卫生人力的关键成员,致力于解决因COVID-19大流行而恶化的社会、经济和卫生不平等问题。虽然人们越来越重视和利用卫生保健模型,并认识到在大流行期间调整和创新这些模型的重要性,但很少有研究考察卫生保健模型在COVID-19大流行期间运行的变化过程,以及促进或限制卫生保健公平努力的因素。本协议文件描述和反映了我们的定性研究中所使用的研究方法。CATALYST研究旨在研究卫生工作者在COVID-19大流行期间发挥的作用,以及与卫生工作者健康公平战略相关的促进因素和障碍。本定性研究结合了社区卫生工作者、社区卫生工作者参与的低收入有色人种社区、机构代表和政策制定者在大流行期间熟悉当地实施的社区卫生工作者模式的生活经验。通过以社区为基础的参与性研究过程,本研究涉及数据收集和分析的溯因定性方法。在设计研究问题和数据收集过程中,我们将社区成员的专业知识与卫生保健和卫生公平框架结合起来。此外,我们使用了一种分析方法,将归纳(从定性数据中得出)和演绎代码(从理论框架和通过参与式研究过程整合的基于实践的证据中得出)结合起来,并灵活地利用灵活的编码来解决归纳主题和基于实践的问题。我们的合作过程提供了具体的战略,与社区合作伙伴一起制定定性研究方案,并利用证据为政策、规划和关系变化提供信息,以支持和扩大CHW模式,促进社区卫生和卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
International Journal of Qualitative Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Highlights Impact Factor: 5.4 Ranked 5/110 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary – SSCI Indexed In: Clarivate Analytics: Social Science Citation Index, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Scopus Launched In: 2002 Publication is subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC) Submit here International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on methodological advances, innovations, and insights in qualitative or mixed methods studies. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信