Remote Robotic Neurointervention: Overcoming Procedural and Connectivity Challenges.

Gary R Duckwiler, Charles B Beaman, Michael Kilpatrick, Daniel L Cooke, Kazim H Narsinh, Geoffrey P Colby, David J Bell, Ben Waldau
{"title":"Remote Robotic Neurointervention: Overcoming Procedural and Connectivity Challenges.","authors":"Gary R Duckwiler, Charles B Beaman, Michael Kilpatrick, Daniel L Cooke, Kazim H Narsinh, Geoffrey P Colby, David J Bell, Ben Waldau","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Access to endovascular interventions for neurointerventional procedures remains concentrated in metropolitan centers, limiting availability in smaller cities, rural regions, and developing nations. The feasibility of remote robotic intervention faces several challenges, including enabling full robotic navigation, managing contrast injection, and maintaining stable network connectivity. This study addresses these key obstacles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A robotic system was deployed at the Translational Research Imaging Center (TRIC) lab at UCLA. Connectivity was assessed both before and during the procedures. Five remote Neurointerventionalists operated four devices-two novel steerable catheters, one off-the-shelf microcatheter, and one guidewire-from femoral access to the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in a silicone vascular model. Radiopaque contrast injections were performed, and audiovisual communication was maintained throughout. Connectivity metrics, including round-trip time (RTT) and bandwidth, were monitored. Primary endpoints included successful navigation to the MCA within 15 minutes, first-attempt vessel entry rate, and episodes of tool-tip contact with the vessel wall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following catheter placement in the femoral sheath, all procedures were fully robotically controlled without bedside intervention. Procedural times ranged from 11:01 to 14:00 minutes, with a mean RTT below 150ms. Two brief episodes of unsafe latency (RTT >150 ms) were recorded. First-attempt vessel entry was successful in 84.2% of cases, and minimal vessel wall contact occurred (1-2 episodes per procedure).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of remote robotic neurointervention, effectively addressing key challenges in robot-assisted endovascular procedures and network connectivity management.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>PTZ = Pan Tilt Zoom Camera; RTT = round-trip time; TRIC = Translational Research Imaging Center lab at UCLA; RR = Remedy Robotics; LCCA = Left Common Carotid Artery; RCFA = right common femoral artery; ACA = Anterior Cerebral Artery; ICA = Internal Carotid Artery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Access to endovascular interventions for neurointerventional procedures remains concentrated in metropolitan centers, limiting availability in smaller cities, rural regions, and developing nations. The feasibility of remote robotic intervention faces several challenges, including enabling full robotic navigation, managing contrast injection, and maintaining stable network connectivity. This study addresses these key obstacles.

Methods: A robotic system was deployed at the Translational Research Imaging Center (TRIC) lab at UCLA. Connectivity was assessed both before and during the procedures. Five remote Neurointerventionalists operated four devices-two novel steerable catheters, one off-the-shelf microcatheter, and one guidewire-from femoral access to the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in a silicone vascular model. Radiopaque contrast injections were performed, and audiovisual communication was maintained throughout. Connectivity metrics, including round-trip time (RTT) and bandwidth, were monitored. Primary endpoints included successful navigation to the MCA within 15 minutes, first-attempt vessel entry rate, and episodes of tool-tip contact with the vessel wall.

Results: Following catheter placement in the femoral sheath, all procedures were fully robotically controlled without bedside intervention. Procedural times ranged from 11:01 to 14:00 minutes, with a mean RTT below 150ms. Two brief episodes of unsafe latency (RTT >150 ms) were recorded. First-attempt vessel entry was successful in 84.2% of cases, and minimal vessel wall contact occurred (1-2 episodes per procedure).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of remote robotic neurointervention, effectively addressing key challenges in robot-assisted endovascular procedures and network connectivity management.

Abbreviations: PTZ = Pan Tilt Zoom Camera; RTT = round-trip time; TRIC = Translational Research Imaging Center lab at UCLA; RR = Remedy Robotics; LCCA = Left Common Carotid Artery; RCFA = right common femoral artery; ACA = Anterior Cerebral Artery; ICA = Internal Carotid Artery.

远程机器人神经干预:克服程序和连接挑战。
背景和目的:神经介入手术的血管内介入仍然集中在大都市中心,限制了小城市、农村地区和发展中国家的可用性。远程机器人干预的可行性面临几个挑战,包括实现全机器人导航、管理造影剂注入和保持稳定的网络连接。这项研究解决了这些关键障碍。方法:在加州大学洛杉矶分校的转化研究成像中心(TRIC)实验室部署了一个机器人系统。在手术前和手术过程中对连通性进行了评估。五名远程神经介入医师在硅胶血管模型中操作了四个设备——两个新型的可操纵导管,一个现成的微导管和一个导丝——从股骨通道到大脑中动脉(MCA)。行透射线造影剂注射,全程保持视听交流。对连通性指标(包括往返时间(RTT)和带宽)进行了监控。主要终点包括在15分钟内成功导航到MCA,首次尝试进入血管的率,工具尖端接触血管壁的次数。结果:在股鞘内放置导管后,所有手术均完全由机器人控制,无需床边干预。手术时间从11:01到14:00分钟不等,平均RTT低于150ms。记录了两次短暂的不安全潜伏期(RTT > 150ms)。84.2%的病例首次尝试血管入路成功,极少发生血管壁接触(每次手术1-2次)。结论:本研究证明了远程机器人神经干预的可行性,有效解决了机器人辅助血管内手术和网络连接管理的关键挑战。缩写:PTZ =平移倾斜变焦相机;RTT =往返时间;加州大学洛杉矶分校转化研究成像中心实验室;RR = Remedy Robotics;左颈总动脉;右股总动脉;大脑前动脉;ICA =颈内动脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信