Comparison of Uniportal Subxiphoid Lung Cancer Surgery Using Multi-Joint Wristed Instruments and Uniportal Lung Cancer Surgery Technique: Evaluation of Early Outcomes.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Celal Buğra Sezen, Melike Ülker, Oğuzhan Bayraktar, Dilekhan Kizir, Mustafa Vedat Doğru, Cemal Aker, Özkan Saydam, Muzaffer Metin
{"title":"Comparison of Uniportal Subxiphoid Lung Cancer Surgery Using Multi-Joint Wristed Instruments and Uniportal Lung Cancer Surgery Technique: Evaluation of Early Outcomes.","authors":"Celal Buğra Sezen, Melike Ülker, Oğuzhan Bayraktar, Dilekhan Kizir, Mustafa Vedat Doğru, Cemal Aker, Özkan Saydam, Muzaffer Metin","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study aims to compare the early outcomes of the surgeon-powered robotic uniportal subxiphoid resection technique with conventional uniportal techniques. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients operated on for lung cancer between January 2022 and December 2023, comparing those who underwent uniportal lung resection with those who received the uniportal subxiphoid surgical technique. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of 90 patients in the study, 31 underwent subxiphoid resection while 59 underwent the uniportal surgical technique. When comparing the average lengths of hospital stay, the subxiphoid group had an average stay of 3.8 ± 1.2 days while the uniportal surgery group had an average stay of 4.8 ± 1.9 days (<i>P</i> = .004). At the 1-hour postoperative evaluation, the visual analog scale score for the subxiphoid group averaged 2.2 ± 1, while the uniportal surgery group averaged 3.2 ± 1.6 (<i>P</i> = .002). Complications were observed in four patients (12.9%) in the subxiphoid group and eight patients (13.5%) in the uniportal surgery group (<i>P</i> = .927). <b><i>Conclusion</i></b>: Uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery resections are safe and provide advantages such as less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"35 5","pages":"394-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the early outcomes of the surgeon-powered robotic uniportal subxiphoid resection technique with conventional uniportal techniques. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients operated on for lung cancer between January 2022 and December 2023, comparing those who underwent uniportal lung resection with those who received the uniportal subxiphoid surgical technique. Results: Out of 90 patients in the study, 31 underwent subxiphoid resection while 59 underwent the uniportal surgical technique. When comparing the average lengths of hospital stay, the subxiphoid group had an average stay of 3.8 ± 1.2 days while the uniportal surgery group had an average stay of 4.8 ± 1.9 days (P = .004). At the 1-hour postoperative evaluation, the visual analog scale score for the subxiphoid group averaged 2.2 ± 1, while the uniportal surgery group averaged 3.2 ± 1.6 (P = .002). Complications were observed in four patients (12.9%) in the subxiphoid group and eight patients (13.5%) in the uniportal surgery group (P = .927). Conclusion: Uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery resections are safe and provide advantages such as less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays for patients.

多关节腕式器械与单门静脉肺癌手术技术在剑突下肺癌手术中的比较:早期疗效评价。
背景:本研究旨在比较外科手术驱动的单门静脉机器人剑突下切除术技术与传统单门静脉手术技术的早期疗效。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年12月期间接受肺癌手术的患者,比较单门肺切除术与单门剑突下手术技术的患者。结果:90例患者中,31例行剑突下切除术,59例行单门静脉手术。两组平均住院时间比较,剑突下手术组平均住院时间为3.8±1.2天,单门静脉手术组平均住院时间为4.8±1.9天(P = 0.004)。术后1小时评估时,剑突下手术组视觉模拟评分平均为2.2±1分,单门静脉手术组平均为3.2±1.6分(P = 0.002)。剑突下手术组出现并发症4例(12.9%),单门静脉手术组出现并发症8例(13.5%)(P = .927)。结论:单门剑突下胸腔镜手术切除安全,术后疼痛少,住院时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信