Perceptions of nurse-physician interactions: insights from medical students' clinical internships.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2500560
Anna Bovo, Mayra Veronese, Renzo Zanotti, Matteo Danielis
{"title":"Perceptions of nurse-physician interactions: insights from medical students' clinical internships.","authors":"Anna Bovo, Mayra Veronese, Renzo Zanotti, Matteo Danielis","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2500560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC) brings together health and social care professionals to enhance patient outcomes through mutual respect, effective communication, and shared responsibility. However, while Interprofessional Education (IPE) is essential for improving communication and care quality, its implementation remains challenging. One major obstacle is the cultural and historical difference in how nurses and physicians perceive IPC, which can hinder effective collaboration.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore medical students' perspectives of nurse-physician interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative descriptive study examined written reports from 406 second-year medical students enrolled at the University of Padua. To identify patterns in nurse-physician interactions, data were analysed using Bales' Interaction Process Analysis categories through a deductive content analysis approach. Additionally, qualitative analysis software facilitated the coding process, with Bales' category integrated into ATLAS® Search&Code for text analysis. Furthermore, this research was conducted and reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 438 student-reported detections were extracted from the reports and categorised into 12 of the Bales' social interaction categories, revealing distinct roles and communication styles between nurses and physicians. Students detailed that nurses frequently provided opinions and orientations, reflecting a supportive role, while physicians were more inclined to seek orientation, indicating a collaborative approach. Moreover, the findings highlighted hierarchical dynamics, as nurses more likely to agree with others' decisions, whereas physicians were less engaged in passive agreement. Moreover, students observed that stress and tension were more prevalent among physicians than nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the complementary yet distinct roles of nurses and physicians in clinical settings, underscoring the importance of balanced teamwork. Addressing hierarchical dynamics and enhancing communication are crucial for improving both patient care and job satisfaction. Therefore, training programs should focus on mitigating these barriers and fostering open communication to build a more cohesive healthcare environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2500560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2500560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC) brings together health and social care professionals to enhance patient outcomes through mutual respect, effective communication, and shared responsibility. However, while Interprofessional Education (IPE) is essential for improving communication and care quality, its implementation remains challenging. One major obstacle is the cultural and historical difference in how nurses and physicians perceive IPC, which can hinder effective collaboration.

Purpose: To explore medical students' perspectives of nurse-physician interactions.

Methods: This qualitative descriptive study examined written reports from 406 second-year medical students enrolled at the University of Padua. To identify patterns in nurse-physician interactions, data were analysed using Bales' Interaction Process Analysis categories through a deductive content analysis approach. Additionally, qualitative analysis software facilitated the coding process, with Bales' category integrated into ATLAS® Search&Code for text analysis. Furthermore, this research was conducted and reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.

Results: A total of 438 student-reported detections were extracted from the reports and categorised into 12 of the Bales' social interaction categories, revealing distinct roles and communication styles between nurses and physicians. Students detailed that nurses frequently provided opinions and orientations, reflecting a supportive role, while physicians were more inclined to seek orientation, indicating a collaborative approach. Moreover, the findings highlighted hierarchical dynamics, as nurses more likely to agree with others' decisions, whereas physicians were less engaged in passive agreement. Moreover, students observed that stress and tension were more prevalent among physicians than nurses.

Conclusion: The study highlights the complementary yet distinct roles of nurses and physicians in clinical settings, underscoring the importance of balanced teamwork. Addressing hierarchical dynamics and enhancing communication are crucial for improving both patient care and job satisfaction. Therefore, training programs should focus on mitigating these barriers and fostering open communication to build a more cohesive healthcare environment.

医护互动的认知:来自医学生临床实习的见解。
跨专业协作(IPC)将卫生和社会护理专业人员聚集在一起,通过相互尊重、有效沟通和分担责任来提高患者的治疗效果。然而,尽管跨专业教育(IPE)对于提高沟通和护理质量至关重要,但其实施仍然具有挑战性。一个主要障碍是护士和医生如何看待感染预防控制的文化和历史差异,这可能阻碍有效合作。目的:探讨医学生对护医互动的看法。方法:本定性描述性研究检查了帕多瓦大学406名二年级医学生的书面报告。为了确定护士-医生互动的模式,通过演绎内容分析方法,使用Bales的互动过程分析类别对数据进行分析。此外,定性分析软件促进了编码过程,将Bales的类别集成到ATLAS®Search&Code中进行文本分析。此外,本研究是按照报告定性研究准则的标准进行和报告的。结果:从报告中提取了438例学生报告的检测结果,并将其分类为12个Bales社会互动类别,揭示了护士和医生之间不同的角色和沟通方式。学生们详细描述了护士经常提供意见和指导,反映了一个支持的角色,而医生更倾向于寻求指导,表明合作的方式。此外,研究结果强调了等级动态,因为护士更有可能同意他人的决定,而医生较少参与被动同意。此外,学生们观察到压力和紧张在医生中比护士更普遍。结论:本研究强调了护士和医生在临床环境中互补而又不同的角色,强调了平衡团队合作的重要性。解决层级动态和加强沟通对于改善患者护理和工作满意度至关重要。因此,培训计划应侧重于减轻这些障碍并促进开放的沟通,以建立更具凝聚力的医疗保健环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信