Present-Focused Behavior as a Rational Adaptation to Precarity.

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00195
Arjun Mitra, Narayanan Srinivasan, Nisheeth Srivastava
{"title":"Present-Focused Behavior as a Rational Adaptation to Precarity.","authors":"Arjun Mitra, Narayanan Srinivasan, Nisheeth Srivastava","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inter-temporal impulsivity has been implicated in several theoretical explanations of the self-reinforcing nature of low socioeconomic status (SES). However, how exactly this interaction transpires is yet to be identified. We hypothesize that impulsivity arises from planning failures due to unpredictable resource demands, and people learn to adapt to this by being present-focused. We tested this hypothesis across three studies using a novel paradigm in which participants used a farming simulator and chose crops with different risk and time preferences. We found that participants' revealed time preferences adaptively shortened when they faced resource shocks and expanded in the absence of such shocks. We also found greater shrinkage of temporal horizons when these shocks were unpredictable rather than predictable. Our work shows that irrationality need not be invoked to explain the occurrence of present-bias in low SES individuals, and that such behavior may simply be a rational adaptation to the environmental demands of planning under precarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"452-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inter-temporal impulsivity has been implicated in several theoretical explanations of the self-reinforcing nature of low socioeconomic status (SES). However, how exactly this interaction transpires is yet to be identified. We hypothesize that impulsivity arises from planning failures due to unpredictable resource demands, and people learn to adapt to this by being present-focused. We tested this hypothesis across three studies using a novel paradigm in which participants used a farming simulator and chose crops with different risk and time preferences. We found that participants' revealed time preferences adaptively shortened when they faced resource shocks and expanded in the absence of such shocks. We also found greater shrinkage of temporal horizons when these shocks were unpredictable rather than predictable. Our work shows that irrationality need not be invoked to explain the occurrence of present-bias in low SES individuals, and that such behavior may simply be a rational adaptation to the environmental demands of planning under precarity.

关注当下的行为是对不稳定性的理性适应。
跨期冲动性涉及到低社会经济地位(SES)自我强化性质的几个理论解释。然而,这种相互作用究竟是如何发生的还有待确定。我们假设,冲动源于不可预测的资源需求导致的计划失败,人们通过专注于当下来学会适应这种情况。我们通过三项研究验证了这一假设,其中参与者使用农业模拟器,选择具有不同风险和时间偏好的作物。我们发现,当面临资源冲击时,参与者的时间偏好会自适应地缩短,而在没有资源冲击时,时间偏好会自适应地扩大。我们还发现,当这些冲击是不可预测的而不是可预测的时,时间视界的收缩会更大。我们的研究表明,不需要用非理性来解释低社会经济地位个体中出现的“现在偏见”,这种行为可能只是对不稳定环境下规划需求的理性适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信