Stakeholder attitudes and perceptions of the new simulated consultation assessment for GP licencing in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional mixed methods survey.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Education for Primary Care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1080/14739879.2025.2484803
A Niroshan Siriwardena, Joseph N A Akanuwe, Susan Bodgener, Bryn Wilkes, Stuart Copus, Rich Withnall
{"title":"Stakeholder attitudes and perceptions of the new simulated consultation assessment for GP licencing in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional mixed methods survey.","authors":"A Niroshan Siriwardena, Joseph N A Akanuwe, Susan Bodgener, Bryn Wilkes, Stuart Copus, Rich Withnall","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2025.2484803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Simulated Consultation Assessment (SCA) replaced the Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) as the summative clinical component of the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners (MRCGP) examination for the United Kingdom (UK) general practice licencing assessment in 2023. The SCA consists of 12 online consultations with trained role players, with candidates based in their own surgery. This study aimed to gather views of stakeholders on the new assessment before its introduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey. Stakeholders completing the survey included pre-RCA and post-RCA GP trainees and educator/lay stakeholders. The survey questionnaire included Likert scaled responses and free text options. Analysis included descriptive statistics, scale development measuring positivity towards SCA, a multivariable model showing factors related to this, and qualitative assessment of free text responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3,174 responses from 1,533 pre-RCA trainees, 920 post-RCA trainees, and 721 educator/lay stakeholders. Responders overall were positive about the design of SCA in terms of setting, validity, preparation and fairness. Multivariable analysis showed that International Medical Graduates (IMGs) were significantly more positive compared to UK graduates (B 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with no other differences by stakeholder group, age or ethnicity. Qualitative analysis identified four themes relating to setting requirements and contingency planning, acceptability and fairness to candidates, ability to assess consultation skills and the need for evidence for the new assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stakeholders, while positive overall, expressed suggestions relating to practice setting, the assessment's acceptability and fairness, its ability to assess consultation skills and the need for further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"132-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2484803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Simulated Consultation Assessment (SCA) replaced the Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) as the summative clinical component of the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners (MRCGP) examination for the United Kingdom (UK) general practice licencing assessment in 2023. The SCA consists of 12 online consultations with trained role players, with candidates based in their own surgery. This study aimed to gather views of stakeholders on the new assessment before its introduction.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey. Stakeholders completing the survey included pre-RCA and post-RCA GP trainees and educator/lay stakeholders. The survey questionnaire included Likert scaled responses and free text options. Analysis included descriptive statistics, scale development measuring positivity towards SCA, a multivariable model showing factors related to this, and qualitative assessment of free text responses.

Results: There were 3,174 responses from 1,533 pre-RCA trainees, 920 post-RCA trainees, and 721 educator/lay stakeholders. Responders overall were positive about the design of SCA in terms of setting, validity, preparation and fairness. Multivariable analysis showed that International Medical Graduates (IMGs) were significantly more positive compared to UK graduates (B 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.25, p < 0.001) with no other differences by stakeholder group, age or ethnicity. Qualitative analysis identified four themes relating to setting requirements and contingency planning, acceptability and fairness to candidates, ability to assess consultation skills and the need for evidence for the new assessment.

Conclusion: Stakeholders, while positive overall, expressed suggestions relating to practice setting, the assessment's acceptability and fairness, its ability to assess consultation skills and the need for further evaluation.

利益相关者的态度和看法新的模拟咨询评估GP执照在英国:横断面混合方法调查。
背景:模拟会诊评估(SCA)取代了记录会诊评估(RCA),成为2023年英国(UK)全科医生执照评估的皇家全科医生学院(MRCGP)会员考试的总结性临床组成部分。SCA包括12个在线咨询,由训练有素的角色扮演者进行,候选人以自己的手术为基础。本研究旨在收集持份者对新评估的意见。方法:我们进行了横断面在线调查。完成调查的利益相关者包括rca前和rca后的GP学员和教育者/非专业利益相关者。调查问卷包括李克特量表和免费文本选项。分析包括描述性统计、测量SCA积极性的量表开发、显示相关因素的多变量模型,以及对自由文本反应的定性评估。结果:从1533名rca前受训人员、920名rca后受训人员和721名教育/非专业利益相关者中获得了3174份反馈。总体而言,应答者在情境、效度、准备和公平性方面对SCA的设计持肯定态度。多变量分析显示,与英国毕业生相比,国际医学毕业生(IMGs)明显更积极(B 0.19, 95%可信区间0.12-0.25,p)。结论:利益相关者虽然总体上是积极的,但对实践环境、评估的可接受性和公平性、评估咨询技能的能力以及进一步评估的必要性提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信