Mothana Yousif Al Jaber, Ahmad Al Shammari, Faisal Talal Al Subaie, Zakaria Alhowaish, Mahmoud Mohammed Al Harbi, Saud A AlNaaim
{"title":"Assessment of Diagnostic Knowledge and the Management of Bell's Palsy Among Primary HealthCare Physicians in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Mothana Yousif Al Jaber, Ahmad Al Shammari, Faisal Talal Al Subaie, Zakaria Alhowaish, Mahmoud Mohammed Al Harbi, Saud A AlNaaim","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S514912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bell's palsy is a common cause of acute peripheral facial nerve paralysis. Its symptoms can mimic other severe conditions, posing diagnostic challenges for primary care physicians (PCPs). This study aimed to assess the diagnostic knowledge and management preparedness of PCPs in Saudi Arabia regarding Bell's palsy. Particular emphasis was placed on identifying critical knowledge gaps that may affect clinical decision-making, especially in corticosteroid dosing and standardized diagnostic approaches.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. A total of 204 physicians participated in the study. Non-probability convenience sampling was used to recruit participants, which included general practitioners and family medicine physicians with at least 1 year of clinical experience. Structured surveys were distributed both online and in person to collect data on demographic information, knowledge of Bell's palsy, diagnostic confidence, treatment approaches, and perceived barriers. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression in SPSS version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean knowledge score was 11.06 (standard deviation = 3.01), with significant gaps in areas such as the House-Brackmann grading system (57.8% correct) and the recurrence of Bell's palsy (54.4% correct). Although most respondents correctly identified the cranial nerve (94.1%) and treatment timeline (65.7%), their knowledge of corticosteroid dosage was suboptimal (56.4%). Family medicine physicians had higher knowledge levels than general practitioners (p = 0.004). Moreover, 52.5% reported no diagnostic barriers, whereas 47.5% mentioned issues such as unclear diagnostic criteria (17.2%) and limited tools (8.3%). Among those interested in additional education, 94.1% preferred online training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although PCPs showed a strong understanding of Bell's palsy, significant gaps were identified in advanced diagnostic and management areas. Addressing these deficiencies, particularly in corticosteroid dosing and structured diagnostic frameworks, is essential to enhancing clinical preparedness. These findings underscore the need for targeted educational interventions, including online training and standardized diagnostic protocols, to bridge knowledge gaps, improve diagnostic accuracy, and optimize patient management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1493-1502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S514912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Bell's palsy is a common cause of acute peripheral facial nerve paralysis. Its symptoms can mimic other severe conditions, posing diagnostic challenges for primary care physicians (PCPs). This study aimed to assess the diagnostic knowledge and management preparedness of PCPs in Saudi Arabia regarding Bell's palsy. Particular emphasis was placed on identifying critical knowledge gaps that may affect clinical decision-making, especially in corticosteroid dosing and standardized diagnostic approaches.
Patients and methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. A total of 204 physicians participated in the study. Non-probability convenience sampling was used to recruit participants, which included general practitioners and family medicine physicians with at least 1 year of clinical experience. Structured surveys were distributed both online and in person to collect data on demographic information, knowledge of Bell's palsy, diagnostic confidence, treatment approaches, and perceived barriers. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression in SPSS version 26.
Results: The mean knowledge score was 11.06 (standard deviation = 3.01), with significant gaps in areas such as the House-Brackmann grading system (57.8% correct) and the recurrence of Bell's palsy (54.4% correct). Although most respondents correctly identified the cranial nerve (94.1%) and treatment timeline (65.7%), their knowledge of corticosteroid dosage was suboptimal (56.4%). Family medicine physicians had higher knowledge levels than general practitioners (p = 0.004). Moreover, 52.5% reported no diagnostic barriers, whereas 47.5% mentioned issues such as unclear diagnostic criteria (17.2%) and limited tools (8.3%). Among those interested in additional education, 94.1% preferred online training.
Conclusion: Although PCPs showed a strong understanding of Bell's palsy, significant gaps were identified in advanced diagnostic and management areas. Addressing these deficiencies, particularly in corticosteroid dosing and structured diagnostic frameworks, is essential to enhancing clinical preparedness. These findings underscore the need for targeted educational interventions, including online training and standardized diagnostic protocols, to bridge knowledge gaps, improve diagnostic accuracy, and optimize patient management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.