The efficacy and safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among hospitalized cirrhotic patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Abdel-Naser Elzouki, Mohamed Nabil Elshafei, Islam Elzouki, Munir Abu-Ageila, Muhammad Aamir Waheed, Elmukhtar Habas, Suhail Doi, Mohammed I Danjuma
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among hospitalized cirrhotic patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdel-Naser Elzouki, Mohamed Nabil Elshafei, Islam Elzouki, Munir Abu-Ageila, Muhammad Aamir Waheed, Elmukhtar Habas, Suhail Doi, Mohammed I Danjuma","doi":"10.1016/j.ajg.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic anticoagulation on incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding events, and mortality in hospitalized cirrhotic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the following databases (EMBASE, PubMed, MedRxiv and google-scholar) to search for studies that satisfied the reviewers pre-specified inclusion criteria. The incidence of VTE, bleeding risks, and mortality were assessed using a quality effect meta-analytic model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From screening of 539 studies, a total of 9 studies (n = 6275 patients) satisfied inclusion criteria. Our results suggested no significant difference in the primary outcome of VTE events in both groups of cirrhotic patients who received and did not receive anticoagulation for VTE prophylaxis, (OR:0.9, 95 % CI:0.50-1.62). Similarly, there was a non-significant reduced risk of bleeding events in hospitalized cirrhotic amongst patient cohorts receiving VTE prophylaxis compared to those who did not (OR:0.51, 95 % CI:0.22-1.14). Analysis of three studies showed no significant difference in mortality in both groups (OR 1.02, 95 % CI:0.8-1.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a pooled examination of studies evaluating outcomes in patients exposed to VTE prophylactic anticoagulation, we found no significant difference in the burden of VTE or mortality between treated and untreated patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The retrospective design of a plurality of studies enrolled in the review meant further prospective studies are needed to objectively ascertain the efficacy and safety of VTE prophylaxis amongst patient cohorts with CLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48674,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajg.2025.01.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic anticoagulation on incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding events, and mortality in hospitalized cirrhotic patients.

Methods: We utilized the following databases (EMBASE, PubMed, MedRxiv and google-scholar) to search for studies that satisfied the reviewers pre-specified inclusion criteria. The incidence of VTE, bleeding risks, and mortality were assessed using a quality effect meta-analytic model.

Results: From screening of 539 studies, a total of 9 studies (n = 6275 patients) satisfied inclusion criteria. Our results suggested no significant difference in the primary outcome of VTE events in both groups of cirrhotic patients who received and did not receive anticoagulation for VTE prophylaxis, (OR:0.9, 95 % CI:0.50-1.62). Similarly, there was a non-significant reduced risk of bleeding events in hospitalized cirrhotic amongst patient cohorts receiving VTE prophylaxis compared to those who did not (OR:0.51, 95 % CI:0.22-1.14). Analysis of three studies showed no significant difference in mortality in both groups (OR 1.02, 95 % CI:0.8-1.31).

Conclusion: In a pooled examination of studies evaluating outcomes in patients exposed to VTE prophylactic anticoagulation, we found no significant difference in the burden of VTE or mortality between treated and untreated patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The retrospective design of a plurality of studies enrolled in the review meant further prospective studies are needed to objectively ascertain the efficacy and safety of VTE prophylaxis amongst patient cohorts with CLD.

住院肝硬化患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和研究目的:本荟萃分析旨在评估预防性抗凝治疗对住院肝硬化患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)、出血事件和死亡率的影响。方法:利用EMBASE、PubMed、MedRxiv和google-scholar数据库检索符合审稿人预设纳入标准的研究。静脉血栓栓塞发生率、出血风险和死亡率采用质量效应荟萃分析模型进行评估。结果:在539项研究中,共有9项研究(n = 6275例患者)符合纳入标准。我们的研究结果显示,两组接受抗凝治疗和未接受抗凝治疗的肝硬化患者静脉血栓栓塞事件的主要结局无显著差异(OR:0.9, 95% CI:0.50-1.62)。同样,在接受静脉血栓栓塞预防的住院肝硬化患者中,与未接受静脉血栓栓塞预防的患者相比,出血事件的风险也没有显著降低(OR:0.51, 95% CI:0.22-1.14)。对三项研究的分析显示,两组的死亡率无显著差异(OR 1.02, 95% CI:0.8-1.31)。结论:在一项评估静脉血栓栓塞预防性抗凝治疗患者预后的研究汇总检查中,我们发现治疗和未治疗的慢性肝病(CLD)患者的静脉血栓栓塞负担或死亡率没有显著差异。本综述纳入的多个研究的回顾性设计意味着需要进一步的前瞻性研究来客观地确定CLD患者队列中静脉血栓栓塞预防的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Arab Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) publishes different studies related to the digestive system. It aims to be the foremost scientific peer reviewed journal encompassing diverse studies related to the digestive system and its disorders, and serving the Pan-Arab and wider community working on gastrointestinal disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信