Cognitive interviewing of the older adults with cancer - depression scale (OAC-D): A patient-reported outcome (PRO).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Rebecca M Saracino, Laura C Polacek, Rebecca Tutino, Hayley Pessin, Kathleen A Lynch, Thomas M Atkinson, Christian J Nelson
{"title":"Cognitive interviewing of the older adults with cancer - depression scale (OAC-D): A patient-reported outcome (PRO).","authors":"Rebecca M Saracino, Laura C Polacek, Rebecca Tutino, Hayley Pessin, Kathleen A Lynch, Thomas M Atkinson, Christian J Nelson","doi":"10.1017/S1478951525000355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to refine the content of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure via cognitive interviewing techniques to assess the unique presentation of depressive symptoms in older adults with cancer (OACs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OACs (≥ 70years) with a history of a depressive disorder were administered a draft measure of the <i>Older Adults with Cancer - Depression (OAC-D) Scale</i>, then participated in a semi-structured cognitive interview to provide feedback on the appropriateness, comprehensibility, and overall acceptability of measure. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and qualitative methods guided revision of scale content and structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OACs (<i>N</i> = 10) with a range of cancer diagnoses completed cognitive interviews. Participants felt that the draft measure took a reasonable amount of time to answer and was easily understandable. They favored having item prompts and response anchors repeated with each item for ease of completion, and they helped identify phrasing and wording of key terms consistent with the authors' intended constructs. From this feedback, a revised version of the OAC-D was created.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The <i>OAC-D Scale</i> is the first PRO developed specifically for use with OACs. The use of expert and patient input and rigorous cognitive interviewing methods provides a conceptually accurate means of assessing the unique symptom experience of OACs with depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525000355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to refine the content of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure via cognitive interviewing techniques to assess the unique presentation of depressive symptoms in older adults with cancer (OACs).

Methods: OACs (≥ 70years) with a history of a depressive disorder were administered a draft measure of the Older Adults with Cancer - Depression (OAC-D) Scale, then participated in a semi-structured cognitive interview to provide feedback on the appropriateness, comprehensibility, and overall acceptability of measure. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and qualitative methods guided revision of scale content and structure.

Results: OACs (N = 10) with a range of cancer diagnoses completed cognitive interviews. Participants felt that the draft measure took a reasonable amount of time to answer and was easily understandable. They favored having item prompts and response anchors repeated with each item for ease of completion, and they helped identify phrasing and wording of key terms consistent with the authors' intended constructs. From this feedback, a revised version of the OAC-D was created.

Significance of results: The OAC-D Scale is the first PRO developed specifically for use with OACs. The use of expert and patient input and rigorous cognitive interviewing methods provides a conceptually accurate means of assessing the unique symptom experience of OACs with depression.

老年人癌症抑郁量表(OAC-D)的认知访谈:患者报告的结果(PRO)。
目的:本研究旨在通过认知访谈技术来完善一种新的患者报告结果(PRO)测量的内容,以评估老年癌症患者(OACs)抑郁症状的独特表现。方法:对有抑郁病史的老年癌症患者(≥70岁)实施老年癌症-抑郁(OAC-D)量表草案,然后进行半结构化认知访谈,对量表的适当性、可理解性和总体可接受性进行反馈。访谈录音和转录,并采用定性方法指导量表内容和结构的修订。结果:有一系列癌症诊断的OACs (N = 10)完成了认知访谈。与会者认为该措施草案需要合理的时间来回答,而且很容易理解。他们喜欢在每个条目中重复条目提示和响应锚,以方便完成,他们帮助确定与作者预期结构一致的关键术语的措辞和措辞。根据这一反馈,创建了一个修订版本的OAC-D。结果的意义:OAC-D量表是第一个专门用于oac的PRO。使用专家和患者输入和严格的认知访谈方法,提供了一种概念上准确的方法来评估oac伴抑郁症的独特症状体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信